Skip to main content

A Call for a Broader Range of Dependent Variables in Advertising Research

  • Chapter
Advances in Advertising Research (Vol. 1)
  • 2143 Accesses

Abstract

Using experiments to evaluate the effectiveness of various advertising strategies has a long tradition in academic research in marketing (see e.g., Strong, 1912, for an early example). These experiments typically evaluate the effects of using a certain strategy (e.g., humor or celebrity endorsement) or executional style or elements (e.g., color or images) on a small set of dependent variables. The dependent variables in most cases are brand attitude and brand purchase intention, and to a limited extent attitude toward the ad. The dominance of these variables is demonstrated by the fact that they are the most common dependent variables in meta-analyses of advertising research (e.g., Brown and Stayman, 1992; Eisend, 2006, 2009). This practice is problematic for at least two reasons. Firstly, it suggests a belief that advertising works by having a positive effect on either brand attitude or brand purchase intention, or both, but not by influencing other variables (Figure 1).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aaker, Jennifer L. (1997). Dimensions of Brand Personality, Journal of Marketing Research, 34(August), 347–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, Icek (1988). Attitudes, Personality, and Behavior. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, Icek (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(December), 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, Icek (2002). Perceived Behavioral Control, Self-Efficacy, Locus of Control, and the Theory of Planned Behavior, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(April), 665–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armitage, Christopher J., Conner, Mark (2001). Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: A Meta-Analytic Review, British Journal of Social Psychology, 40(December), 471–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, Ida E., Mitchell, Andrew A. (1989). The Effect of Advertising on Attitude Accessibility, Attitude Confidence, and the Attitude-Behavior Relationship, Journal of Consumer Research, 16(December), 269–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergkvist, Lars (2009). Confidence’s Role in the Attitude-Intention and Beliefs-Attitude Relationships, International Journal of Advertising, 28(5), in press.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briñol, Pablo, Petty, Richard E., Tormala, Zakary L. (2004). Self-Validation of Cognitive Responses to Advertisements, Journal of Consumer Research, 30(March), 559–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Steven P., Stayman, Douglas M. (1992). Antecedents and Consequences of Attitude toward the Ad: A Meta-analysis, Journal of Consumer Research, 19(June), 34–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cialdini, Robert B., Goldstein, Noah J. (2004). Social Influence: Compliance and Conformity, Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 591–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Cannière, Marie Hélène, De Pelsmacker, Patrick, Geuens, Maggie (2009). Relationship Quality and the Theory of Planned Behavior Models of Behavioral Intentions and Purchase Behavior, Journal of Business Research, 62(January), 82–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisend, Martin (2006). Two-Sided Advertising: A Meta-Analysis, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 23(June), 187–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisend, Martin (2009). A Meta-Analysis of Humor in Advertising, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 37(June), 191–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, Richard H. (1978). Planning Public Service Advertising Messages: An Application of the Fishbein Model and Path Analysis, Journal of Advertising, 7(Winter), 28–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fazio, Russel H. (1986). How Do Attitudes Guide Behavior? In: Sorrentino, R. M., Higgins, E. T., editors. Handbook of Motivation and Cognition. New York: The Guilford Press, 204–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fazio, Russel H., Zanna, Mark P. (1978). On the predictive validity of attitudes: The roles of direct experience and confidence, Journal of Personality, 46(2), 228–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, Martin, Ajzen, Icek (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, Martin, Middlestadt, Susan E. (1995). Noncognitive Effects on Attitude Formation and Change: Fact or Artifact?, Journal of Consumer Psychology, 4, 181–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, Noah J., Cialdini, Robert B., Griskevicius, Vladas (2008). A Room with a Viewpoint: Using Social Norms to Motivate Environmental Conservation in Hotels, Journal of Consumer Research, 35(October), 472–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hastak, Manoj (1990). Does Retrospective Thought Measurement Influence Subsequent Measures of Cognitive Structure in an Advertising Context?, Journal of Advertising, 19(September), 3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, John A. (1989). Consumer Behavior in Marketing Strategy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huneke, Mary E., Cole, Catherine, Levin, Irwin P. (2004). How Varying Levels of Knowledge and Motivation Affect Search and Confidence during Consideration and Choice, Marketing Letters, 15(July), 67–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirmani, Amna (1997). Advertising Repetition as a Signal of Quality: If It's Advertised So Much, Something Must Be Wrong, Journal of Advertising, 26(Fall), 77–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krosnick, Jon A., Boninger, David S., Chuang, Yao C., Berent, Matthew K., Carnot, Catherine G. (1993). Attitude Strength: One Construct or Many Related Constructs?, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1132–1151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Yih Hwai (2000). Manipulating Ad Message Involvement through Information Expectancy: Effects on Attitude Evaluation and Confidence, Journal of Advertising, 29, 29–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, Donald R. (1977). Responses to Advertising a New Car, Journal of Advertising Research, 17(August), 23–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machleit, Karen A., Allen, Chris T., Madden, Thomas J. (1993). The Mature Brand and Brand Interest: An Alternative Consequence of Ad-Evoked Affect, Journal of Marketing, 67(October), 72–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, C. Whan, Jaworski, Bernard J., MacInnis, Deborah J. (1986). Strategic Brand Concept-Image Management, Journal of Marketing, 50(October), 135–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petty, Richard E., Briñol, Pablo, DeMarree, Kenneth G. (2007). The Meta-Cognitive Model (MCM) of Attitudes: Implications for Attitude Measurement, Change, and Strength, Social Cognition, 25(October), 657–686.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priester, Joseph R., Nayakankuppam, Dhananjay, Fleming, Monique A., Godek, John (2004). The A2SC2 Model: The Influence of Attitudes and Attitude Strength on Consideration and Choice, Journal of Consumer Research, 30(March), 574–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossiter, John R., Bellman, Steven (2005). Marketing Communications. Theory and Applications. Frenchs Forest, NSW: Pearson Education Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossiter, John R., Percy, Larry (1997). Advertising Communications & Promotion Management (Second Edition). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Robert E., Swinyard, William R. (1983). Attitude-Behavior Consistency: The Impact of Product Trial Versus Advertising, Journal of Marketing Research, 20(Augusti), 257–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Robert E., Swinyard, William R. (1988). Cognitive Response to Advertising and Trial: Belief Strength, Belief Confidence and Product Curiosity, Journal of Advertising, 17(September), 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strong, Edward K. , Jr. (1912). The Effect of Length of Series Upon Recognition Memory, Psychological Review, 447–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, Max, Sylvester, Alice K. (2000). Advertising and the Mind of the Consumer. What Works, What Doesn't and Why (2nd Edition). London: Kogan Page Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Putte, Bas. (2006). The Integrative Framework for Effective Communication. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Communication Association, Dresden, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Putte, Bas, Dhondt, Godfried (2005). Developing Successful Communication Strategies: A Test of an Integrated Framework for Effective Communication, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35(November), 2399–2420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Ralf Terlutter Sandra Diehl Shintaro Okazaki

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Gabler Verlag | Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bergkvist, L. (2010). A Call for a Broader Range of Dependent Variables in Advertising Research. In: Terlutter, R., Diehl, S., Okazaki, S. (eds) Advances in Advertising Research (Vol. 1). Gabler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-6006-1_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics