Abstract
This paper contributes to the reappraisal of the issues approached in gentrification studies. It focuses on the role of public policies in the gentrification of the Paris inner city and, in addition to presenting technical aspects, it provides a critical analysis of this phenomenon, aiming to shed light on the political meaning of public action occurring there today. The paper gives an overview of the actors, factors and spatial dynamics involved in the gentrification process since the 1980s and then focuses in more detail on public action since 2001, when the left (Parti socialiste) took over the Paris municipality. While political goals still remain relatively ambiguous, the authors of the present paper set out to clarify the global consequences of public policies in housing, public spaces and culture. In spite of the city Council’s will to overhaul public policies, its action has been unsuccessful so far in stopping the gentrification process in Paris. It has indeed actually contributed to it by transforming public spaces and by the modes of cultural action implemented.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
For instance the following can be quoted: the Cité des sciences et de l’industrie opened in 1986 on the site of the former La Villette abattoir, or the Opéra Bastille opened in 1989 on the edge of the Faubourg St Antoine which was in the process of marked gentrification.
- 2.
Paris is divided into arrondissements that are numbered from the centre outwards in spiral form.
- 3.
A new mode of calculation included extensive rehabilitation in the category of new constructions.
- 4.
This refers to housing used as main residence and provided with neither toilets nor bath/shower.
- 5.
What is referred to here is the definition of socio-demographic profiles for the Paris IRIS developed in a study on the Paris quarters (Saint-Julien 2008). Eight socio-demographic profiles were defined by considering the distribution of inhabitants over 15 on the basis of age, educational level, social category of households reference person, and employment status. This typology was then set against the map of the “green quarters” (Fleury 2007).
- 6.
The “Comité métallos” groups local associations and inhabitants who mobilised between 1997 and 2001 to save the site, which was at the time up for part sale by the Union, from property speculation. Today this collective denounces the fact that it has been cut off from the new Maison des Métallos which has become a cultural establishment run by the municipality, and also the fact that it is rented out to private enterprises 30 days a year [see www.lesmetallos.org].
- 7.
This is reported in a study for APUR, the urban development agency of the city of Paris, entitled Les classes moyennes et le logement à Paris (Nov 2006), in which the middle classes are defined partly arbitrarily so as to correspond to 60% of the Paris population.
References
APUR (2007a) L’Accès au logement social à Paris. Analyse de la demande de logement social et bilan des attributions de logements sociaux à Paris en 2006
APUR (2007b) L’Accession à Paris et la politique du logement des banques, p 53
APUR (2008) L’Accès au logement social à Paris. Analyse de la demande de logement social et bilan des attributions de logements sociaux à Paris en 2007, p 81
Atkinson R, Bridge G (eds) (2005) Gentrification in a global context: the new urban colonialism. Routledge, Milton Park, p 300
Authier J-Y, Bidou-Zachariasen C (eds) (2008) La gentrification urbaine, Espaces et Sociétés, n° pp 132–133
Bacqué M-H (ed) (2005) Projets urbains en quartiers anciens. La Goutte d’Or, South End, rapport au PUCA, p 239
Belina B (2003) Evicting the undesirables. The idealism of public space and the materialism of the bourgeois state. Belgeo, 1:47–62
Bidou C (1984) Les Aventuriers du quotidien: essai sur les nouvelles classes moyennes. PUF, Paris, p 200
Bidou-Zachariasen C (ed) (2003) Retours en ville: des processus de “gentrification” urbaine aux politiques de “revitalisation” des centres. Descartes & Cie, Paris, p 267
Bihr A, et Pfefferkorn R (1999) Déchiffrer les inégalités, Syros – La Découverte, 2e éd, 1999, p 416
Blondiaux L (2000) La démocratie par le bas. Prise de parole et délibération dans les conseils de quartier du 20e arrondissement de Paris. Hermès, no 26–27:323–338
Clerval A (2004) La Cour de Bretagne. Un cas de gentrification dans un quartier populaire, Paris, APUR, p 45
Clerval A (2008a) Les anciennes cours réhabilitées des faubourgs: une forme de gentrification à Paris. Espaces et sociétés, no 132–133:91–106
Clerval A (2008b) La gentrification à Paris intra-muros : dynamiques spatiales, rapports sociaux et politiques publiques, thèse de doctorat en géographie, Université de Paris 1, p 602
Davis M (1990) City of quartz: excavating the future in Los Angeles. Verso, London/New York, p 462
Fijalkow Y, et Préteceille E (eds) (2006) Gentrification: discours et politiques, Sociétés Contemporaines, n° 63, pp 5–14
Fleury A (2007) Les Espaces publics dans les politiques métropolitaines. Réflexions au croisement de trois expériences: de Paris aux quartiers centraux de Berlin et Istanbul, thèse de doctorat en géographie, Université de Paris 1, p 685
Fleury A, Mathian H, Saint-Julien T (2008) Les centralités commerciales. In: Rhein C, Blidon M, Fleury A, Guérin-Pace F, Humain-Lamoure A-L (eds) Regards sur les quartiers parisiens. Contextes spatiaux, usages politiques et pratiques citadines, étude pour le compte de la Ville de Paris, UMR Géographie-cités, pp 33–57
Froment-Meurice M (2008) Le contrôle par le mobilier urbain. Les aménagements dissuasifs dans les espaces publics parisiens, mémoire de master 2, Université de Paris 1, p 64
Glass R (1964) “Introduction: Aspects of Change” in centre for urban studies (ed) London, aspects of change, Macgibbon & Kee, London, pp XII–XLI
Joseph I (1998) L’hospitalité et l’univers des rencontres In: La ville sans qualités, La Tour d’Eygues, L’Aube, pp 89–103
Lees L, Ley D (2008) Introduction to special issue on gentrification and public policy. Urban Studies 45(12):2379–2384
Mitchell D (1997) The annihilation of space by law: the roots and implications of anti-homeless laws. Antipode, no 29:303–335
Pouessel C (2005) Réinventer les espaces publics par la fête: le cas de Paris, mémoire de maîtrise en géographie, Université de Paris 1, p 152
Préteceille E (2007) Is gentrification a useful paradigm to analyse social changes in the Paris metropolis? Environ Plann A 39(1):10–31
Rhein C (2007) Changements sociaux et transformation de l’espace In: Saint-Julien T, Le Goix R (eds) La Métropole parisienne. Centralités, inégalités, proximités, Belin, Paris, pp 139–163
Saint-Julien T (2008) Les contextes socio-résidentiels In: Rhein C, Blidon M, Fleury A, Guérin-Pace F, Humain-Lamoure A-L (eds) Regards sur les quartiers parisiens. Contextes spatiaux, usages politiques et pratiques citadines, étude pour le compte de la Ville de Paris, UMR Géographie-cités, pp 21–31
Simon P (1994) La Société partagée. Relations interethniques et interclasses dans un quartier en rénovation: Belleville (Paris, 20e), thèse de doctorat en sociologie, EHESS, p 557
Simon P (2005) Gentrification of old neighborhoods and social integration in Europe. In: Kazepov Y (ed) Cities of Europe. Blackwell, Malden, pp 210–232
Slater T (2006) The Eviction of critical perspectives from gentrification research. Int J Urban Reg Res 30(4):737–757
Smith N (1979) Gentrification and capital: practice and ideology in Society Hill. Antipode 11(3):24–35
Smith N (1982) Gentrification and uneven development. Econ Geogr 58(2):139–155
Smith N (1992) New city, new frontier: the lower East side as wild, wild West. In: Sorkin M (ed) Variations on a theme park: the new American city and the end of public space. Hill and Wang, New York, pp 61–93
Smith N (1996) The new urban frontier: gentrification and the revanchist city. Routledge, New York, pp XX–262
Smith N (2003) La gentrification généralisée: d’une anomalie locale à la ‘régénération’ urbaine comme stratégie urbaine globale. In: Bidou-Zachariasen C (ed) Retours en ville: des processus de “gentrification” urbaine aux politiques de “revitalisation” des centres. Descartes & Cie, Paris, pp 45–72
Van Criekingen M, et Fleury A (2006) La ville branchée: gentrification et dynamiques commerciales à Bruxelles et à Paris. Belgéo 1–2:113–133
Vicario L, Martínez Monje PM (2003) Another ‘Guggenheim effect’? The generation of a potentially gentrifiable neighbourhood in Bilbao. Urban Stud 40(12):2383–2400
Vivant E, et Charmes É (2008) La gentrification et ses pionniers: le rôle des artistes off en question, Métropoles, 3, Varia, http://metropoles.revues.org/document1972.html [mis en ligne le 22 septembre 2008]
Wacquant L (2008) Relocating gentrification: the working-class, science and the state in recent urban research. Int J Urban Reg Res 32(1):198–205
Zeneidi-Henry D (2003) Les SDF et la ville. Géographie du savoir-survivre, Bréal, Paris, p 288
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Clerval, A., Fleury, A. (2013). Urban Policy and Gentrification. A Critical Analysis Using the Case of Paris. In: Diappi, L. (eds) Emergent Phenomena in Housing Markets. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2864-1_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2864-1_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Physica, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-2863-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-7908-2864-1
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)