Abstract
We examine one of the methods implemented by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) BioSense program. The program uses data from hospitals and public health departments to detect outbreaks using the Early Aberration Reporting System (EARS). The EARS W2r method allows one to monitor the proportion of counts of a particular syndrome at a facility relative to the total number of visits. We investigate the performance of the W2r method with negative binomial inputs designed using an empirical recurrence interval (RI). An adaptive threshold monitoring method is studied based on estimating the underlying negative binomial distributions, then converting the current counts to a Z-score through a p-value. We study the effect of the input distributions on the upper thresholds required for both Shewhart and exponentially weighted moving average (EWMA) versions of the W2r and adaptive threshold methods. We simulate 1-week outbreaks and compare the outbreak detection properties of the methods.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2007). Real-time hospital data user guide: Application version 2.11. http://www.cdc.gov/biosense/files/CDC_BioSense_BioSense_Hospital_Data_User_Guide_V2.11.pdf. Accessed May 2009.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2008). Biosense technical overview of data collection, analysis, and reporting. http://www.cdc.gov/BioSense/files/BioSense_Techn_Overview_102908_webpage.pdf. Accessed May 2009.
Fraker, S. E., Woodall, W. H., & Mousavi, S. (2008). Performance metrics for surveillance schemes. Quality Engineering,20(4), 451–464.
Gan, L. (2010). Adaptive threshold method for monitoring rates in public health surveillance. Ph.D. thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
Hutwagner, L., Thompson, W., Seeman, G. M., & Treadwell, T. (2003). The bioterrorism preparedness and response early aberration reporting system (EARS). Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine,80(2(Suppl. 1)), i89–i96.
Kleinman, K. P., Abrams, A., Mandl, K., & Platt, R. (2005) Simulation for assessing statistical methods of biologic terrorism surveillance. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report,54(Suppl), 101–108.
Lambert, D., & Liu, C. (2006). Adaptive thresholds: Monitoring streams of network counts. Journal of the American Statistical Association,101(473), 78–88.
Montgomery, D. C. (2009). Introduction to statistical quality control (6th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Szarka III, J. L. (2011). Surveillance of negative binomial and bernoulli processes. Ph.D. thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
Szarka III, J. L., Gan, L., & Woodall, W. H. (2011). Comparison of the early aberration reporting system (EARS) W2 methods to an adaptive threshold method. Statistics in Medicine,30(5), 489–504.
Tokars, J. I., Burkom, H., Xing, J., English, R., Bloom, S., Cox, K., & Pavlin, J. A. (2009). Enhancing time-series detection algorithms for automated biosurveillance. Emerging Infectious Diseases,15(4), 533–539.
Watkins, R. E., Eagleson, S., Veenedaal, B., Wright, G., & Plant, A. (2008). Applying cusum-based methods for the detection of outbreaks of Ross River virus disease in Western Australia. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making,8, 37.
Woodall, W. H., & Mahmoud, M. A. (2005). The inertial properties of quality control charts. Technometrics,47(4), 425–436.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported in part by NSF Grant CMMI-0927323 and a grant from Merck & Co., Inc.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gan, L., Woodall, W.H., Szarka, J.L. (2012). Adaptive Threshold Methods for Monitoring Rates in Public Health Surveillance. In: Lenz, HJ., Schmid, W., Wilrich, PT. (eds) Frontiers in Statistical Quality Control 10. Frontiers in Statistical Quality Control, vol 10. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2846-7_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2846-7_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Physica, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-2845-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-7908-2846-7
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)