Skip to main content

Sustainability Economics, Resource Efficiency, and the Green New Deal

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

The chapter addresses major sustainability issues within a simple general framework. It studies energy scarcity and endogenous capital formation in the long and medium run. It is shown that energy efficiency depends on the sectoral structure of the economy. Accordingly, structural change is an efficient way to promote both efficiency and sustainable development. The results for the medium run imply that the current crises offer a scope for the greening of the economy, provided that policy increases productivity through trust-building. However, there are major differences between economic recovery and sustainability so that the proposals of the Green New Deal have to be evaluated with care.

This paper has been previously published in International Economics and Economic Policy, Special Issue on “International Economics of Resources and Resource Policy”, Volume 7, Numbers 2–3/August 2010.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The division by the intermediate input is convenient but not necessary for the argument.

  2. 2.

    Empirical evidence suggests that a decrease in energy use fosters investments in physical and knowledge capital and is neutral with regard to human capital, see Bretschger (2009).

  3. 3.

    To take B positive but smaller than unity would be feasible as well.

  4. 4.

    Trust is not added in this case but used in the following figures.

  5. 5.

    In parallel, employment might get hit because the reallocation of workers can cause adjustment costs, but this is not included in the model.

  6. 6.

    This result is not necessarily identical to the long run, see Sect. 1.3.

References

  • Arrow KJ (1962) The economic implications of learning by doing. Rev Econ Stud 29:155–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbier EB (1999) Endogenous growth and natural resource scarcity. Environ Resour Econ 14(1):51–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbier EB (2009) A global green new deal. Report prepared for the green economy initiative and the division of technology. Industry and Economics of the UN Environment Programme

    Google Scholar 

  • Bovenberg AL, Smulders S (1995) Environmental quality and pollution-augmenting technological change in a two-sector endogenous growth model. J Public Econ 57:369–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bretschger L (1998) How to substitute in order to sustain: knowledge driven growth under environmental restrictions. Environ Dev Econ 3:425–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bretschger L (1999) Growth theory and sustainable development. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Bretschger L (2009) Energy prices, growth, and the channels in between: theory and evidence. CER-ETH Economics Working Paper Series 06/47, ETH Zurich

    Google Scholar 

  • Bretschger L, Smulders S (2008) Sustainability and substitution of exhaustible natural resources: how resource prices affect long-term R&D-investments. CER-ETH Economics Working Paper Series03/26, ETH Zurich

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleveland C, Ruth M (1997) When, where and by how much do biophysical limits constrain the economic process: a survey of Nicolas Georgescu-Roegen’s contribution to ecological economics. Ecol Econ 22:203–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta PS, Heal GM (1974) The optimal depletion of exhaustible resources. Rev Econ Stud 41:3–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egli H, Steger T (2007) A dynamic model of the environmental Kuznets curve: turning point and public policy. Environ Resour Econ 36(1):15–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimaud A, Rougé L (2003) Non-renewable resources and growth with vertical innovations: optimum, equilibrium and economic policies. J Environ Econ Manag 45:433–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones C (1995) R&D-based models of economic growth. J Polit Econ 103:759–784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López R, Anriquez G, Gulati S (2007) Structural change and sustainable development. J Environ Econ Manag 53:307–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peretto P (2009) Energy taxes and endogenous technological change. J Environ Econ Manag 57(3):269–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholz CM, Ziemes G (1999) Exhaustible resources, monopolistic competition, and endogenous growth. Environ Resour Econ 13:169–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smulders S (2000) Economic growth and environmental quality. In: Folmer H, Gabel L (eds) Principles of environmental economics (Chapter 20). Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Solow RM (1974a) Intergenerational equity and exhaustible resources. Rev Econ Stud 41:29–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solow RM (1974b) The economics of resources or the resources of economics. Am Econ Rev 64:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern N (2007) The economics of climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz JE (1974) Growth with exhaustible natural resources: efficient and optimal growth paths. Rev Econ Stud 41:123–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xepapadeas A (2006) Economic growth and the environment. In: Mäler K-G, Vincent J (eds) Handbook of environmental economics. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lucas Bretschger .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

Calculation of B

$$ \begin{array}{lll}{B_j}(t) = \kappa \cdot {K_j}(t) - \kappa \cdot {K_j}{(t)^2}/{\overline K_j}(t) + 1 \hfill \hskip -45pt\\{\overline B_j}:\frac{{\partial {B_j}(t)}}{{\partial {K_j}(t)}} = 0 \hfill \\\kappa = 2 \cdot \kappa \cdot {K_j}(t)/{\overline K_j}(t) \hfill \\{K_j}(t) = 2 \cdot {K_j}(t) \hfill \\{K_j}(t) = {\overline K_j}(t)/2 \hfill \\\hfill \\\end{array} $$

Inserting in the logistic function gives

$$ \begin{array}{lll} {\overline B_j}(t) = \kappa \cdot {\overline K_j}(t)/2\left[ {1 - {{\overline K }_j}(t)/2{{\overline K }_j}(t)} \right] + 1 \hskip -12.4pc \cr = \kappa \cdot {\overline K_j}(t)/2 \cdot 1/2 + 1 \cr= \kappa \cdot {\overline K_j}(t)/4 + 1 \hfill \\\hfill \\\end{array} $$

so that \( {\overline K_j}(t) = 4\left( {{{\overline B }_j} - 1} \right)/\kappa \) if \( {\underline K_j}(t) = 0 \) and \( {\overline K_j}(t) - {\underline K_j}(t) = 4\left( {{{\overline B }_j} - 1} \right)/\kappa \) if \( {\underline K_j}(t) > 0 \) as used in the main text.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Physica-Verlag HD

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bretschger, L. (2011). Sustainability Economics, Resource Efficiency, and the Green New Deal. In: Bleischwitz, R., Welfens, P., Zhang, Z. (eds) International Economics of Resource Efficiency. Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2601-2_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics