Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1294 Accesses

Part of the book series: Contributions to Economics ((CE))

Abstract

Taking into account the significant changes and challenges in rural areas and the economic and organizational advantages of towns, it can be expected that towns will become increasingly important for (inter)national policy makers, especially in relation to the decentralization of rural policies. This book aims to answer the following research questions: Can small-and medium-sized towns still be considered as concentration points of economic activities for town and hinterland actors? And should they be the focus point in rural development?

In this book, the multifaceted relationships between town-hinterland and the regional economy will be explored at different spatial levels and for different actors, in particular for households, farms and firms. Furthermore, this book will show an interesting range of analyses, varying from macroeconomic analyses of the local economy in five different countries to the simulation of the total population of one Dutch town at postcode level.

Fresh flowers, cucumbers and strawberries, yesterday picked in Africa, can today be bought in many supermarkets in Europe, swiftly transported by plane. The Internet even allows us to buy these products from the comfort of our own chair, without going outside. The meaning of distance and location is changing very fast. On the other hand, more and more people are searching for authenticity and historical details: traditional costumes, food, and crafts are highly appreciated. In addition, in rural areas, many new developments are taking place. In 1897 Berthelot foresaw that, by the year 2000, the manufacturing of (artificial) food would be independent of the season, rain, drought and frost. To a certain extent he was right, as in many places agriculture has become almost like any other industry; in others this is not (yet) possible or not wanted. The shift from agriculture to industry and services, as well as the urban desire to preserve the idyllic countryside creates a certain tension for local rural actors. The question, however, is: Are they passive victims or active players?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Exceptions are a number of studies dealing with town issues in the UK, e.g. Thomas and Bromley 1995; Powe and Shaw 2004; Findlay and Sparks 2008). However, studies about such towns in other European countries are rarely found.

  2. 2.

    However, to urbanites, rural living does not necessarily mean living in a completely rural area; half of them would like to move either to the real countryside or to a residential environment in the urban zone with rural characteristics.

  3. 3.

    The 1st pillar concentrates on providing basic income support to farmers, who are free to produce in response to market demand, while the 2nd pillar supports agriculture, as a provider of public goods, in its environmental and rural functions, and rural areas in their development (European Communities 2006).

  4. 4.

    Interestingly, to a certain extent, this approach seems to work. Around 2004, the first initiatives began to take effect and maintain a certain level of facilities in small towns by developing ‘Hart shops’ or ‘Service shops’. In many regions the provincial government subsidizes local initiatives to develop shops in which both commercial and public services are offered at the same location, in order to keep a basic level of facilities (Lieshout 2005). An example is a small town near Deventer called Lettele, where the municipality of Deventer opened a service point in an existing shop, and, recently, the library also started to lend books from this location. Nevertheless, the government is (still) responsible for social care, cultural facilities, and libraries.

  5. 5.

    The local economy is defined as that of town and hinterland together.

  6. 6.

    Marketowns project funded by the European Commission under the Fifth Framework Programme for Research and Technology Development, Contract QLRT -2000-01923. The project involves the collaboration of The University of Reading (UK), the University of Plymouth (UK), the Joint Research Unit INRA-ENESAD (France), the Agricultural Economics Research Institute LEI (The Netherlands), Polish Academy of Sciences (Poland) and the University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (Portugal).

  7. 7.

    One small and one medium-sized town.

  8. 8.

    In the Marketowns study, seven zones are distinguished (town, direct hinterland, extended hinterland, rest of the region, rest of the country, rest of Europe and rest of the world. However, in this study the main focus is on the local economy, thus allowing the aggregation of the last four zones into one ‘rest of the world’ zone.

References

  • Beardsell, M. & Henderson, V. (1999). Spatial evolution in the computer industry in the USA. European Economic Review, 43(2), 431–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, D. & Henderson, V. (1999). A theory of urban growth. The Journal of Political Economy, 2(107), 252–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broersma, L. & van Dijk, J. (2008). The effect of congestion and agglomeration on multifactor productivity growth in Dutch regions. Journal of Economic Geography, 8(2), 181–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Champion, A. (1998). Studying counterurbanisation and the population turnaround. In P. Boyle & K. Halfacree (Eds.), Migration into rural areas. Theories and issues. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Communities, E. (2006). The EU rural development policy 2007–2013. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • DEFRA. (2000). Rural white paper: our countryside: the future – a fair deal for rural England. London: DETR. 176.

    Google Scholar 

  • DEFRA. (2004). Rural Strategy 2004. London: Defra Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • EEAC/RLG/WUR (2007). Website ‘Cap in 27 Member States’, www.rlg.nl/CAP.

  • Findlay, A. & Sparks, L. (2008). Weaving new retail and consumer landscapes in the Scottish borders. Journal of Rural Studies, 24, 86–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleaser, E. L., Kallal, H., Scheinkman, J., & Sheifler, A. (1992). Growth in cities. Journal of Political Economy, 100, 1126–1152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadyńska, A. & Hadyński, J. (2006). Conceptions of multifunctionality: The state-of-the-art in Poland. European Series on Multifunctionality, 10, 83–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Havermans, O. (2007, 27th October). Gemeenteloket in veelzijdige dorpswinkel. Trouw.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heins, S. (2004). Rural living in city and countryside: demand and supply in the Netherlands. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 19, 391–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isard, W., Azis, I. J., Drennan, M. P., Miller, R. E., Saltzman, S., & Thorbecke, E. (1998). Methods of interregional and regional analysis. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, M. C. W. (1990). Micro and Macro in Economics An inquiry into their relation Groningen theses in economics, management & organization. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhof.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayfield, L., Courtney, P., Tranter, R., & Jones, P. (2005). The role of small and medium-sized towns in rural development – Final Report. Reading, MA: Centre for Agricultural Strategy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministère des Affaires étrangères. (2006). Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development Policy in France. Ministère des Affaires étrangères, Paris: Direction Générale de la Coopération Internationale et du Développement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Housing, Spatial planning and Environment. (2000). Perspectief op Wonen. Den Haag: Rapportage van het Woning Behoefte Onderzoek.VROM.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2002). Territorial indicators of socio-economic patterns and dynamics. OECD, DT/TDPC(2002)23, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powe, N. A. & Shaw, T. (2004). Exploring the current and future role of marjet towns in servicing their hinterlands: a case study of Alnwick in the North East of England. Journal of Rural Studies, 20, 405–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Râmniceanua, I. & Ackrill, R. (2007). EU rural development policy in the new member states: promoting multifunctionality? Journal of Rural Studies, 23, 416–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray, C. (2006). Neo-endogenous rural development in the EU. In: P.J. Cloke, T. Marsden and P.H. Mooney. Handbook of Rural Studies. SAGE, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez Rodríguez, M., Galdeano Gómez, E., & Céspedes Lorente, J. (2004). Rural multifunctionality in Europe: the concept and policies. Paper presented to the 90th EAAE Seminar ‘‘Multifunctional agriculture, policies and markets: understanding the critical linkages’’. Rennes, 28–29 October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tacoli, C. (1998). Rural-urban interactions: a guide to the literature. Environment and Urbanization, 10(1), 147–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terluin, I. J., van Leeuwen, M., & Pilkes, J. (2003). Economic linkages between town and hinterland: a comparative analysis of six small and medium-sized towns in the Netherlands. The Hague: Agricultural Economics Research Institute LEI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, C. J. & Bromley, R. D. F. (1995). Retail decline and the opportunities for commercial revitalisation of small shopping centres: a case study in South Wales. Town Planning Review, 66, 431–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Ploeg, J. D. & van Dijk, G. (1995). Beyond modernization. The impact of endogenous rural development. Assen: Van Gorcum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, M. (2006). Rural geography: processes responses and experiences in rural restructuring. London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I owe a lot of gratitude to Peter Nijkamp, Piet Rietveld, Teresa de Noronha Vaz and Graham Clarke for their advises and help throughout this research. Furthermore, I would like to thank the Marketowns team for allowing me to use the data collected in the EU-project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eveline S. van Leeuwen .

Appendix A1.1: Names of the 30 selected towns

Appendix A1.1: Names of the 30 selected towns

Country

Towns

England

Leominster

 

Swanage

 

Towcester

 

Tiverton

 

Burnham-on-Sea

 

Saffron Walden

France

Brioude

 

Prades

 

Magny-en-Vexin

 

Mayenne

 

Douarnenez

 

Ballancourt-sur-Essonne

The Netherlands

Dalfsen

 

Bolsward

 

Oudewater

 

Schagen

 

Nunspeet

 

Gemert

Poland

Glogówek

 

Duzniki

 

Oźarów

 

Jędrzejów

 

Ultsroń

 

Lask

Portugal

Mirandela

 

Tavira

 

Lixa

 

Vila Real

 

Silves

 

Esposende

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

van Leeuwen, E.S. (2010). Introduction. In: Urban-Rural Interactions. Contributions to Economics. Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2407-0_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics