Skip to main content

PISA: What makes the difference?

Explaining the gap in test scores between Finland and Germany

  • Chapter
The Economics of Education and Training

Part of the book series: Studies in Empirical Economics ((STUDEMP))

Abstract

The large difference in the level and variance of student performance in the 2000 PISA study between Finland and Germany motivates this paper. It analyses why Finnish students showed a significantly higher performance by estimating educational production functions for both countries, using a unique micro-level dataset with imputed data and added school type information. The difference in reading proficiency scores is assigned to different effects, using Oaxaca-Blinder and Juhn-Murphy-Pierce decomposition methods. The analysis shows that German students and schools have on average more favorable characteristics except for the lowest deciles, but experience much lower returns to these characteristics in terms of test scores than Finnish students. The role of school types remains ambiguous. Overall, the observable characteristics explain more of the variation in test scores in Germany than in Finland.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adams R, Wu M (2002) PISA 2000 technical report. OECD, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Ammermueller A, Heijke H, Woessmann L (2005) Schooling quality in Eastern Europe: Educa- tional production during transition. Econ Educat Rev 24:579-599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Artelt C, Schiefele U, Schneider W, Stanat P (2002) Leseleistungen deutscher Schülerinnen und Schüler im internationalen Vergleich (PISA). Z Erziehungswissenschaften 5:6-27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumert J, Deutsches PISA-Konsortium (2001) PISA 2000: Basiskompetenzen von Schülerinnen und Schülern im internationalen Vergleich. Leske und Budrich, Opladen

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop J, Woessmann L (2004) Institutional effects in a simple model of educational production. Educat Econ 12:17-38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau F, Kahn L (1992) The gender earnings gap: learning from international comparisons. In: Amer- ican Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings of the Hundred and Fourth Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association 82:533-538

    Google Scholar 

  • Blinder A (1973) Wage discrimination: Reduced form and structural estimates. J Human Resour 8:436-455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eurybase (2003) The information network on education in Europe. http://www.eurydice.org, visited October 24th 2003

  • Fertig M (2003) Who’s to blame? The determinants of German student’s achievement in the PISA 2000 study. IZA Discussion Paper No. 739, Bonn

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia J, Hernández P, López-Nicolás A (2001) How wide is the gap? An investigation of gender wage differences using quantile regression. Empirical Econ 26:149-167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hambleton R, Swaminathan H (1989) Item response theory. Principles and applications. Kluwer, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanushek E, Luque J (2003) Efficiency and equity in schools around the world. Econ Educat Rev 22:481-502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jann, B (2005) Standard errors for the Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition. http://repec.org/dsug2005/ oaxaca_se_handout.pdf

  • Juhn C, Murphy K, Pierce B (1993) Wage inequality and the rise in returns to skill. J Polit Econ 101:410-442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lauer C (2000) Gender wage gap in West Germany: How far do gender differences in human capital matter? ZEW Discussion Paper No. 00-07, Mannheim

    Google Scholar 

  • Oaxaca R (1973) Male-female wage differentials in urban labor markets. Int Econ Rev 14:693-709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2001) Knowledge and skills for life: First results from PISA 2000.OECD, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman B (1986) Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. Chapman& Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd P, Wolpin K (2003) On the specification and estimation of the production function for cogni- tive achievement. Econ J 113:F3-F33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Välijärvi J, Linnakylä P, Kupari P, Reinikainen P, Arffman I (2002) The Finnish success in PISA - and some reasons behind it. http://www.jyu.fi/ktl/pisa/publicationl.pdf

  • West M, Woessmann L (2006) Which school systems sort weaker students into smaller classes? International Evidence. European J Polit Econ (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Woessmann L (2003) Schooling resources, educational institutions, and student performance: The international evidence. Oxford Bull Econ Statist 65:117-170

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Physica-Verlag Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ammermueller, A. (2008). PISA: What makes the difference?. In: Dustmann, C., Fitzenberger, B., Machin, S. (eds) The Economics of Education and Training. Studies in Empirical Economics. Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2022-5_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics