Skip to main content

Abstract

In part 1 of this publication it has been shown that the stars in the night sky have always interested and fascinated mankind. Having been completely out of reach for thousands of years, outer space also was (and still is) an important place to nurture human imagination. Only the fast advancement of technology in the 20th century made it possible to explore the universe and to finally prove or defeat the theories of Earth-bound scientists and dreamers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Selected literature

  • Contant, Corinne M. “The need to regulate commercial telecoms: issues and options.” Space Policy 18.1 (2002): 5–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diederiks-Verschoor, Isabella Henrietta Philepina and Kopal, Vladimir. An Introduction to Space Law. The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerhard, Michael. “The state of the art and recent development of national space legislation.” Nationales Weltraumrecht — National Space Law. Eds. Brünner, Christian, and Walter, Edith. Graz: 2008, 58–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertzfeld, Henry R and von der Dunk, Frans. “Bringing space law into the commercial world: property rights without sovereignty.” Chicago Journal of International Law 5.1 (2005): 81–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyall, Francis and Larsen, Paul B. Space Law: a treatise. Farnham: 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Master of Space Studies 1998–1999 (MSS4) Class. “Open for business: a new approach to commercialisation of the International Space Station.” Space Policy 16 (2000): 71–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obermann, Richard M. and Williamson, Ray A. “Implications of previous space commercialization experiences for the reusable launch vehicle.” Acta Astronautica 53 (2003): 149–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salin, Patrick A. “Privatization and militarization in the space business environment.” Space Policy 17.1 (2001): 19–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt-Tedd, Bernhard. “Staatliches Engagement bei partiell marktfähigen Raumfahrtanwendungen und die organisatorische Verankerung des öffentlichen Interesses bei kommerziellen Raumfahrtanwendungen.” Luft-und Weltraumrecht im 21. Jahrhundert. Eds. Marietta Benkö, and W. Kröll. Köln: Liber Amicorum Heinz Böckstiegel, 2001, 424–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, Wayne N., Jr. “Real Property Rights in Outer Space.” Proceedings of the 40th Colloquium on the Law of Outer Space, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics: 1997, 366–375. Web reprint 31 May 2010. http://www.space-settlement-institute.org/Articles/research_library/WayneWhite98.pdf.

Selected literature Code of Conduct/Europe and Arms Race in Space

  • Alves, P.G. Prevention of an Arms Race in Outer Space: A Guide to the Discussions in the Conference on Disarmament. Geneva: United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research, 1991. 60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axworthy, Lloyd. “Prevention of an arms race in outer space.” A Disarmament Agenda for the 21st Century DDA Occasional Papers. No. 6 (October 2002). 106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickow, Marcel. “The European Union proposal for a Code of Conduct on Outer Space Activities.” Yearbook on Space Policy 2007/2008: From Policies to Programmes. Eds. Kai-Uwe Schrogl, Charlotte Mathieu and Nicolas Peter. Vienna: Springer Wien NewYork, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinerman, Taylor. “Space weapons agreements, treaties, and politics.” The Space Review 10 March 2008. 18 March 2008. http://www.thespacereview.com/article/1078/1.

  • Hitchens, Theresa and David Chen. “Forging a Sino-US “grand bargain” in space.” Space policy 24.3 (2008): 129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitchens, Theresa. Future Security in Space-Charting a Cooperative Course. Center for Defense Information, Washington D.C.: 2004. 74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Freese, Joan. “China’s Space Ambitions.” Proliferation Papers. Paris and Brussels: IFRI Research Center, Security Studies Department, 2007. 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kries, Wulf von. “Die militärische Nutzung des Weltraums.” Handbuch des Weltraumrechts. Ed. Karl-Heinz Böckstiegl. Cologne: Carl Heymanns Verlag KG, 1991. 321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moltz, James Clay. “Future Security in Space: Commercial, Military, and Arms Control Trade-Offs.” Occasional Paper No.10. Southampton: Center for Nonproliferation Studies, 2002. 122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rathgeber, Wolfgang and Nina-Louisa Remuss. “Space Security: A Formative Role and Principled Identity for Europe.” ESPI Report 16. Vienna: ESPI, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rathgeber, Wolfgang, Nina-Louisa Remuss and Kai-Uwe Schrogl. “Space security and the European Code of Conduct for Outer Space Activities.” Disarmament Forum 4 (2009): 33–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • For more information on the voting results and the related First Committee discussions see Reaching Critical Will, which usually publishes a “Voting Results Chart for the First Committee and General Assembly” and monitors the First Committee by publishing the “First Committee Monitor”. http://www.reachingcriticalwill.org.

  • Wolter, Detlev. Common Security in Outer Space and International Law. Geneva: United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research, 2005. 57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrogl, Kai-Uwe, and Julia Neumann. “Article IV — Military use of outer space.” The Outer Space Treaty. Cologne Commentary on Space Law (Volume One). Eds. Stephan Hobe, Bernhard Schmidt-Tedd, and Kai-Uwe Schrogl. Cologne: Carl Heymanns Verlag, 2010. 29–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrogl, Kai-Uwe. “Weltraumrecht und Sicherheitspolitik.” Europas Zukunft zwischen Himmel und Erde — Weltraumpolitik für Sicherheit, Stabilität und Prosperität. Ed. Heiko Borchert. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2005: 68–82. 80.

    Google Scholar 

  • For recent developments consider the most recent “Space Security Index.” via the related website. http://www.spacesecurity.org/publications.htm.

NEO

  • Bekey, Ivan (ed.). “Dealing with the Threat to Earth from Asteroids and Comets.” International Academy of Astronautics, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweickart, Russell L. “The Asteroid Impact Threat: Decision Upcoming.” Presentation. 37th COSPAR Scientific Assembly, Montreal, Canada. 13–20 July 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tok, Jessica (ed.). “Asteroid Threats: A Call for Global Response.” Association of Space Explorers International Penl on Asteroid Threat Mitigation, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations General Assembly. Interim Report of the Action Team on Near-Earth Objects (2008–2009) of the Scientific and Technical Subcommittee on its Forty-Sixth Session, held in Vienna from 9 to 20 February 2009. UN Doc. A/AC 105/C.1/L.298 of 10 Dec. 2008. Vienna: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space. Draft Recommendations for Near-Earth Objects Threat Mitigation of the Scientific and Technical Subcommittee on its Forty-Sixth Session, Held in Vienna from 9 to 20 February 2009. UN Doc. A/AC 105/C.1/CRP.13 of 17 Feb. 2009. Vienna: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

Selected literature

  • Balogh, Werner., et al. “The United Nations Programme on Space Applications: Status and direction for 2010.” Space Policy 26 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dresner, Simon. The principles of sustainability. Oxford: Earthscan Ltd, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, Anthony. The politics of climate change. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keiner, Marco (ed.). The future of sustainability. Dordrecht: Springer, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarwar, Golam. International Public Policy on Adaptation to Climate Change: An Assessment of UNFCCC Policy Regime vis-à-vis the Needs for Adaptation in Developing Countries. Saarbrücken: VDM Verlag, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, Lars. “REDD from an integrated perspective: considering overall climate change mitigation, biodiversity conservation and equity issues.” Bonn: Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrogl, Kai-Uwe, Charlotte Mathieu, and Agnieszka Lukaszczyk. Threats, Risks and Sustainability — Answers by Space. Vienna: Springer Wien New York, 2009.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations General Assembly. Space benefits for Africa: Contribution of the United Nations System. A/AC.105/941 of 20 Aug. 2009. Vienna: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

Selected literature

  • Contant-Jorgenson, Corinne, Petr Lala and Kai-Uwe Schrogl (eds.) Cosmic Study on Space Traffic Management. Paris: IAA, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrogl, Kai-Uwe. “Space Traffic Management: The new comprehensive approach for regulating the use of outer space. Results from the 2006 IAA Cosmic Study.” Acta Astronautica (62) 2008: 272–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rathgeber, Wolfgang, Nina-Louisa Remuss and Kai-Uwe Schrogl. “Space security and the European Code of Conduct for Outer Space Activities” UNIDIR Disarmament Forum 4 (2009): 33–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pompidou, Alain, ed. The ethics of space policy. Paris: UNESCO, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnould, Jacques. La seconde chance d’Icare. Pour une éthique de l’Espace. Paris: cerf, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rathgeber, Wolfgang, Kai-Uwe Schrogl and Ray Williamson (eds.). The Fair and Responsible use of Space. An International Perspective. Vienna/New York: Springer Wien NewYork, 2010.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mahulena Hofmann et al. (eds.): Protecting the Environment of Celestial Bodies, Paris (IAA) 2010.

    Google Scholar 

Selected literature

  • Boyle, Alan. “Soft law in International Law-Making.” International law. Ed. M.D. Evans, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006, 141–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupuy, Pierre-Marie. “Soft law and the international law of the environment.” Michigan Journal of International Law 12 (1991): 420–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabrynowicz, Joanne Irene, comments to the discussion paper submitted by Williams, Maureen. “Space law and Remote Sensing Activities.” Proceedings of the UN/Brazil Workshop “Dissemination and Developing International and National Space Law: The Latin America and Caribbean Perspective.” 22–25 Nov. 2004, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • Guzman, Andrew T. “The Design of International Agreements.” 16 European J. Int.l L. (2005): 579–612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillgenberg, Hartmut. “A Fresh Look at Soft Law.” European Journal of International Law 10 (1999): 499–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klabbers, Jan. The concept of treaty in international law. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopal, Vladimir. “The Role of the United Nations Declarations of Principles in the Progressive Development of Space Law”, Journal of Space Law 16.1 (1988): 5–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasentulyana, N. “Strengthening International Space Law: The Role of the United Nations.” International Organizations and Space Law: Their Role and Contributions. Proceedings of the Third ECSL Colloquium, 6–7 May 1999, Perugia, Italy. ESA, 1999. 87–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malanczuk, P. Akehurst’s: Modern introduction to international law. London: Routledge, 1997. 54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchisio, Sergio. “The Evolutionary Stages of the Legal Subcommittee of the United Nations Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space.” Journal of Space Law 31.1 (2005): 219–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raustiala, Kal. “Form and substance in international agreements.” The American Journal of International Law 99. (2005): 581–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, Henry, T. “Mitigating the Danger of Space Debris by Enforcing and Developing already existing Space Law.” Annals of Air and Space Law 34 (2009): 713–774.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelton, Dinah. “Introduction: Law, Non-Law and the Problem of Soft Law.” Commitment and Compliance. The Role of Non-Binding Norms in the International Legal System. Ed. Dinah Shelton, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terekhov, Andrei D, “UN General Assembly Resolutions and Outer Space Law”, Proceedings of the Fortieth Colloquium on the Law of Outer Space (1997), 97–107.

    Google Scholar 

Selected literature

  • Center for Strategic and International Studies, Health of the U.S. Space Industrial Base and the Impact of Export Controls, February 2008; and National Security and the Commercial Space Sector, July 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Executive Office of the President, National Space Policy of the United States, Washington, D.C.: 28 June 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, DC: The Economic Impact of Commercial Space Transportation on the U.S. Economy, April 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fergusson, Ian “The Export Administration Act: Evolution, Provisions, and Debate”, Congressional Research Service report, July 15, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gates, Robert M., Speech Delivered to Business Executives for National Security, Washington DC, Ronald Reagan Building and International Trade Center, Tuesday, April 20, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertzfeld, Henry. R., “Reform of Export Control Laws,” Yearbook on Space Policy 2007/2008, Edited by Schrogl, Kai-Uwe, Mathieu, Charlotte, and Peter, Nicolas: Springer-Verlag: Vienna, Austria, European Space Policy Institute, Pages 210–225, September, 2009.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council, Beyond “Fortress America,” The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Space Foundation. The Space Report, Colorado Springs, CO, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • The White House, Office of the Press Secretary, Fact Sheet on the President’s Export Control Reform Initiative, 20 April 2010; Foundation for a New Export Control System To Strengthen National Security and the Competitiveness of Key U.S. Manufacturing and Technology Sectors, 30 August 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Defense, Office of the Director of Defense Research and Engineering, An Analysis of Export Control of U.S. Technology-A DOD Perspective, 4 February 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Der Dunk, Frans G. “A European “Equivalent” to United States Export Controls: European Law on the Control of International Trade in Dual-Use Space Technologies, Astropolitics, Vol. 7, Pages 101–134, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

Additional key literature bibliography

  • Bertsch, Gary K. and John R. McIntyre, eds. National Security and Technology Transfer. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertsch, Gary K. ed. Controlling East-West Trade and Technology Transfer: Power, Politics, and Policies. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyner, Daniel, ed. Non-Proliferation Export Controls: Origins, Challenges, and Proposals for Strenghtening. Hampshire, England; Ashgate Publishing, Limited, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krasner, Stephen D. Defending the National Interest. Princeton, New Jersey: University Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, Paul R., ed. Strategic Trade Policy and the New International Economics. Cambridge, Massachusettes: M.I.T. Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, John R. and Daniel S. Papp, eds. The Political Economy of International Technology Transfer. New York: Quorum Books, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Academy of Sciences. Balancing the National Interest: U.S. National Security Export Controls and Global Economic Competition. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Academy of Sciences. Finding Common Ground: U.S. Export Controls in a Changed Global Environment. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosecrance, Richard. The Rise of the Trading State: Commerce and Conquest in the Modern World. New York: Basic Books, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Gordon B. The Politics of East-West Trade. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spero, Joan Edelman. The Politics of International Economic Relations. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yergin, Angela Stent. East-West Technology Transfer: European Perspectives. Beverly Hills, California: Sage Publications, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaleski, Eugene and Helgard Weinert. Technology Transfer Between East and West. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

Selected literature

  • Aschbacher, J, Beer, T., Ciccolella, A. Milagro-Pérez, M. P. and Paliouras, E. (2010). “Observing Earth, for a safer planet — GMES Space Component: status and challenges.” ESA Bulletin no. 142, 22–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aschbacher, J. and Milagro-Pérez, M. P. (2009) “GMES — status review and policy developments”, Yearbook on Space Policy-2008/2009: Setting new trends, SpringerWienNew York, ESPI, 188–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • ESA/PB-EO document: “Joint principles for a GMES Sentinel Data Policy,” ESA/PB-EO(2009) 98, rev. 1, 23 October 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament/Council of the European Union. Directive establishing an Infrastructure for Spatial Information in the European Community (INSPIRE). Directive 2007/2/EC of 14 March 2007. Brussels: European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabrynowicz, I. “The Land Remote Sensing Laws and Policies of National Governments: A Global Survey.” Report for the U.S Department of Commerce/National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Satellite and Information Service Commercial Remote Sensing Licensing Program of January 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • “GEOSS Data Sharing Action plan,” doc. 7, rev. 2, GEO-VII, 3–4 Nov 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Group on Earth Observations (GEO). Implementation Guidelines for the GEOSS Data Sharing Principles (2009). Retrievable under: www.earthobservations.org.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Michael (2008) “GEO Announces Free And Unrestricted Access To Full Landsat Archive.” 2 Dec 2008. Earthzine http://www.earthzine.org/2008/12/02/geo-announces-free-and-unrestricted-access-to-full-landsat-archive.

  • The Role of Scientific and Technical Data and Information in the Public Domain: Proceedings of a Symposium by Steering Committee on the Role of Scientific and Technical Data and Information in the Public Domain, Office of International Scientific and Technical Information Programs and National Research Council, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

Selected literature

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Christian Brünner Alexander Soucek

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag/Wien

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Walter, E. et al. (2011). “Hot” Issues and Their Handling. In: Brünner, C., Soucek, A. (eds) Outer Space in Society, Politics and Law. Studies in Space Policy, vol 8. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-0664-8_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics