Skip to main content

On the Database Principle — Knowledge and Delusion

  • Chapter
Mashup Cultures
  • 775 Accesses

Abstract

The following is an experiment I initiated without being fully convinced of its success. I’ve had my doubts if it would work, whether it was something you can expect of an audience at all. Now, after having done it and while I’m writing these last words as an introduction to confirm the experiment’s methodological settings, I am inclined to believe in it. It is quite possible that it works. Surely, the audience remains an unreliable constituent. Most probably, you will have read the www (in a fragmented way, obviously) or you might have visited one of the last Documentas at Kassel (again in a fragmented way, there is no alternative) or you may have watched Christopher Nolan’s film Memento (this, also, is only possible in a fragmented — though different — manner) or you may have learned other ways to error to get lost. If there is just a faint common basis here, it will be quite likely that the following conjectures will have found a symbolic arrangement and thereby can be communicated as knowledge, as an epistemological object.

I think, therefore I am. René Descartes

You know who you are and you know all about yourself. But just for day-to-day stuff notes are really useful. Leonard Shelby

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Manovich, Lev: Database as a Symbolic Form.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Billmayer, Franz. 2002. Veränderungen Übergänge, Umbrüche … Überlegungen zur Documenta11 in Kassel: BDK-Mitteilungen, Nr.4, p. 14–15, p. 15. 29 Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pazzini, Karl-Josef. 2002. Documenta11 — Inszenierung von psychotischer Struktur?“, Lecture at the congress „Produktionen (in) der Psychose der Assoziation für die Freudsche Psychoanalyse“ Burghölzli, 21 September 2002, unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Johnson, Steven. 1997. Interface Culture. How New Technology Transforms the Way We Create & Communicate, San Francisco: HarperEdge/Harper, p. 54.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Manovich, Lev: Manovich, Database, ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Compare: Panofsky, Erwin. 1927. Die Perspektive als’ symbolische Form’, Berlin: Spieß.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Compare: Cassirer, Ernst. 1924. Philosophie der Symbolischen Formen, Darmstadt: WBG.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Foucault, Michel. 1972. The Archaeology of Knowledge & the Discourse on Language. New York: Harper Torchbooks, p. 129.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ibid., 130.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Foucault, Michel. 1970. The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  11. This and the following information is based on research on Internet search engines and Web catalogues, which Steve Steinberg published in the magazine Wired in 1996. (See: Steve G.: “Seek and ye shall find (Maybe)” In: Wired, No 4.05 (1996), p. 108-114, p. 174–182) It is hopelessly outdated by now.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Derrida, Jacques. 2001. L’université sans condition, Paris: Galilée, p. 51.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Derrida expands profoundly on the concepts of “destiny” and its errors, “des tinerrance” in: Derrida, Jacques. 1987. The Postcard: From Socrates to Freud and Beyond, The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kant, Immanuel. 1783. Beantwortung der Frage: Was ist Aufklärung?: Was ist Aufklärung? Aufsätze zu Geschichte und Philosophie, ed. Zehbe, Jürgen, 55–61. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Descartes, René. 1637. Discourse on the Method of Rightly Conducting the Reason, and Seeking Truth in the Sciences http://www.literature.org/authors/descartes-rene/reason-discourse. Accessed 3 August 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Derrida, Jacques. 1978. Cogito and the History of Madness, In Writing and Difference, The University of Chicago Press, p. 67.

    Google Scholar 

  18. 12 Ibid. p. 68.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schmeiser, Leonhard. 2002. Die Erfindung der Zentralperspektive und die Entstehung der neuzeitlichen Wissenschaft, München: Fink, p. 79.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Giesecke, ibid., p. 108.

    Google Scholar 

  21. „Sich im Datenwald dieser Un/ordnung nicht zu verlieren ist der Imperativ einer vertrauten Pädagogik […] Doch sich in einem Labyrinth verirren zu lernen ist die Option einer künftigen Kulturtechnik, jenseits der Archive und als Form einer Reise, deren Ziel man erst kennenlernen muß — destinerrance im Sinne Derridas.“ See: Ernst, Wolfgang. 2002. Das Rumoren der Archive. Ordnung aus Unordnung, Berlin: Merve, p.131.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Panofsky, Erwin. 1927. Die Perspektive als ‘symbolische Form’, Berlin: Spieß.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Giesecke, Michael. 1998. Der Verlust der zentralen Perspektive und die Renais sance der Multimedialität: Kemp, W. et al. (Ed.): Vorträge aus dem Warburg-Haus, Berlin, pp. 85–116, 103.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Compare: Pazzini, Karl-Josef. 1992. Bilder und Bildung. Vom Bild zum Abbild bis zum Miederauftauchen der Bilder; Münster: Lit, p. 58.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Der Verlust der zentralen Perspektive und die Renais sance der Multimedialität: Kemp, W. et al. (Ed.): Vorträge aus dem Warburg-Haus, Berlin Giesecke, ibid., p.106.

    Google Scholar 

Works Cited

  • Billmayer, Franz. 2002. Veränderungen Übergänge, Umbrüche … Überlegungen zur Documenta11 in Kassel: BDK-Mitteilungen, Nr.4, pp. 14–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassirer, Ernst. 1924. Philosophie der Symbolischen Formen, Darmstadt: WBG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes, René. 1637. Discourse on the Method of Rightly Conducting the Reason, and Seeking Truth in the Sciences http://www.literature.org/authors/des cartes-rene/reason-discourse. Accessed 3 August 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, Jacques. 2001. L’université sans condition, Paris: Galilée.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, Jacques. 1987. The Postcard: From Socrates to Freud and Beyond, The University of Chicago Press. Derrida, Jacques. 1978. Cogito and the History of Madness, In Writing and Difference, The University of Chicago Press, p. 67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernst, Wolfgang. 2002. Das Rumoren der Archive. Ordnung aus Unordnung, Berlin: Merve http://emagazine.credit-suisse.com/article/index. cfm?fuseaction=OpenArticle&aoid=12785&lang=EN Date: 07/01/2009

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 1972. The Archaeology of Knowledge & the Discourse on Language. New York: Harper Torchbooks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 1970. The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giesecke, Michael. 1998. Der Verlust der zentralen Perspektive und die Renaissance der Multimedialität: Kemp, W. et al. (Ed.): Vorträge aus dem Warburg-Haus, Berlin, pp. 85–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Steven. 1997. Interface Culture. How New Technology Transforms the Way We Create & Communicate, San Francisco: HarperEdge/Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Immanuel. 1783. Beantwortung der Frage: Was ist Aufklärung?: Was ist Auf-klärung? Aufsätze zu Geschichte und Philosophie, ed. Zehbe, Jürgen, 55–61. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Litz, Christian. 1999. Ein Gefühl, das du auf der Erde nie haben wirst. Warum der Astronaut Ulrich Walter jedem empfehlen würde, einen Kurztrip ins All zu buchen. http://www.brandeins.de/magazin/archiv/1999/ausgabe_02/leitbilder/artikel1. html. Accessed 3 August 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manovich, Lev. 2001. Database as a Symbolic Form. http://www.manovich.net/docs/database.rtf. Accessed 3 August 2009. Compare Manovich, Lev. 2001. The Language of New Media, Cambridge/London: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolan, Christopher. 2001. Script of “Memento”, http://www.christophernolan.net/ files/memento-script.pdf Accessed 3 August 2009 (for educational purpose only).

    Google Scholar 

  • Panofsky, Erwin. 1927. Die Perspektive als’ symbolische Form’, Berlin: Spieß.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pazzini, Karl-Josef. 1992. Bilder und Bildung. Vom Bild zum Abbild bis zum Miederauftauchen der Bilder; Münster: Lit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pazzini, Karl-Josef. 2002. Documenta11 — Inszenierung von psychotischer Struktur?”, Lecture at the congress „Produktionen (in) der Psychose der Assoziation für die Freudsche Psychoanalyse“, Burghölzli, 21 September 2002, unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmeiser, Leonhard. 2002. Die Erfindung der Zentralperspektive und die Entstehung der neuzeitlichen Wissenschaft, München: Fink.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, Steve G. Seek and ye shall find (Maybe). In: Wired, Nr. 4.05, May 1996, 108–114, 174–182

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag/Wien

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Meyer, T. (2010). On the Database Principle — Knowledge and Delusion. In: Sonvilla-Weiss, S. (eds) Mashup Cultures. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-0096-7_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-0096-7_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7091-0095-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-0096-7

Publish with us

Policies and ethics