Skip to main content

Engineering Process Improvement in Heterogeneous Multi-disciplinary Environments with Defect Causal Analysis

  • Conference paper
Book cover Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement (EuroSPI 2014)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 425))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Multi-disciplinary engineering environments, e.g., in automation systems engineering, typically involve different stakeholder groups and engineering disciplines using a variety of specific tools and data models. Defects in individual disciplines can have a major impact on product and process quality in terms of additional cost and effort for defect repair and can lead to project delays. Early defects detection and avoidance in future projects are key challenges for project and quality managers to improve the product and process quality. In this paper we present an adaptation of the defect causal analysis (DCA) approach, which has been found effective and efficient to improve product quality in software engineering contexts. Applying DCA in multi-disciplinary engineering environments enables a systematic analysis of defects and candidate root causes, and can help providing countermeasures for product and process quality. The feasibility study of the adapted DCA has shown that the adaptation is useful and enables improving defect detection and prevention in multi-disciplinary engineering projects and fosters engineering process improvement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Biffl, S., Schatten, A., Zoitl, A.: Integration of Heterogeneous Engineering Environments for the Automation Systems Lifecycle. In: Proc. of Industrial Informatics (Indin) (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Biffl, S., Moser, T., Winkler, D.: Risk Assessment in Multi-Disciplinary (Software+) Engineering Projects. International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering (IJSEKE), Special Session on Risk Assessment 21(2), 211–236 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Campos, J.: Risk management and failure mode and effect analysis for product development. Rapid Innovation LLC (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Card, D.N.: Defect-causal analysis drives down error rates. IEEE Software 10(4), 98–99 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Card, D.N.: Defect Analysis: Basic Techniques for Management and Learning. In: Zelkowitz, M. (ed.) Advances in Computers, vol. 65, pp. 259–295. Elsevier (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chillarege, R.: Orthogonal Defect Classification. In: Lyu, M.R. (ed.) Handbook of Software Reliability Engineering. IEEE (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chemuturi, M.: Mastering Software Quality Assurance: Best Practices, Tools and Techniques for Software Developers. J. Ross Publication Inc. (2010) ISBN: 978-1604270327

    Google Scholar 

  8. Grady, R.B.: Software Failure Analysis for High-Return Process Improvement Decisions. Hewlett Packard Journal 47, 15–24 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Huber, J.T.: A comparison of IBM’s orthogonal defect classification to Hewlett Packards defect origins, types, and modes. In: Proc. Conf. on Appl. of SW Measurement, pp. 1–17 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  10. IEEE: Classification for software anomalies, IEEE Std. 1044-2009 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ishikawa, K.: Guide to Quality Control. Asian Productivity Organization Press (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kalinowski, M., Card, D.N., Travassos, G.H.: Evidence-based guidelines to defect causal analysis. IEEE Software 29(4), 16–18 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kalinowski, M., Mendes, E., Travassos, G.H.: An Industry Ready Defect Causal Analysis approach exploring Bayesian Networks. In: Proc. 6th SW Quality Days, pp. 12–33 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kwak, Y.H., Anbari, F.T.: Benefits, obstacles, and future of six sigma approach. Technovation 26(5), 708–715 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Shull, F.J.: Developing Techniques for using Software Documents: a Series of Empirical Studies. PhD Thesis, University of Maryland (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wagner, S.: Defect classification and defect types revisited. In: Proc. of the 2008 Workshop on Defects in Large Software Systems, pp. 39–40. ACM (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Winkler, D., Biffl, S.: Improving Quality Assurance in Automation Systems Development Projects. In: Quality Assurance and Management, pp. 379–398. INTEC (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Winkler, D., Moser, T., Mordinyi, R., Sunindyo, W.D., Biffl, S.: Engineering Object Change Management Process Observation in Distributed Automation Systems Projects. In: Proc. of the 18th EuroSPI Conference, Roskilde, Denmark (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kovalenko, O., Winkler, D., Kalinowski, M., Serral, E., Biffl, S. (2014). Engineering Process Improvement in Heterogeneous Multi-disciplinary Environments with Defect Causal Analysis. In: Barafort, B., O’Connor, R.V., Poth, A., Messnarz, R. (eds) Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement. EuroSPI 2014. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 425. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43896-1_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43896-1_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-43895-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-43896-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics