Skip to main content

Abductive Inference Design

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 9330 Accesses

Abstract

Abductive inference is inference to the best explanation(s). The traditional definition of abduction is that it traverses deduction in the backward direction: From pq and q, we may tentatively conclude that p. We know that fire implies smoke, we see smoke, and we conclude that there is fire. There is no deductively certain support for this, and there may be other explanations of the occurrence of smoke. Perhaps a Humvee is laying a smoke screen? Douven (Abduction, in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. by A.N. Zalta, Spring 2011 Edition, 2011) gives a good introduction into abduction as a form of reasoning, and Schurz (Synthese 164:201–234, 2008) provides an interesting overview of historical uses of abduction in science, with examples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. W. Bechtel, R.C. Richardson, Discovering Complexity: Decomposition and Localization as Strategies in Scientific Research (MIT Press, Cambridge, 2010). Reissue of the 1993 edition with a new introduction

    Google Scholar 

  2. R.A. Berk, Causal inference for sociological data, in Handbook of Sociology, ed. by N.J. Smelser (Sage, Thousand Oaks, 1988), pp. 155–172

    Google Scholar 

  3. T.D. Cook, D.T. Campbell, Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings (Rand-McNally, Skokie, 1979)

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. Damian, J. Chisan, An empirical study of the complex relationships between requirements engineering processes and other processes that lead to payoffs in productivity, quality and risk management. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 32(7), 433–453 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. I. Douven, Abduction, in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. by A.N. Zalta. Spring 2011 Edition (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. D.A. Freedman, Statistical models and shoe leather. Sociol. Methodol. 21, 291–313 (1991). Reprinted in [7, p. 45–62]

    Google Scholar 

  7. D.A. Freedman, Statistical Models and Causal Inference: A Dialogue With the Social Sciences, ed. by D. Collier, J.S. Sekhon, P.B. Stark (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. N. Groen, Overheid krijgt geen grip of IT-projecten. Automatiseringsgids, 11th April 2013, pp. 22–23

    Google Scholar 

  9. C. Hildebrand, G. Häubl, A. Herrmann, J.R. Landwher, When social media can be bad for you: Community feedback stifles consumer creativity and reduces satisfaction with self-designed products. Inf. Syst. Res. 24(1), 14–29 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. P.W. Holland, Statistics and causal inference. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 81(396), 945–960 (1986)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. D.S. Janzen, H. Saiedian, Does test-driven development really improve software design quality? IEEE Softw. 25(2), 77–84 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. N. Juristo, A. Moreno, Basics of Software Engineering Experimentation (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 2001)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. B. Kitchenham, D.I.K. Sjøberg, R. Dybå, O.P. Brereton, D. Budgen, M. Höst, P. Runeson, Trends in the quality of human-centric software engineering experiments—a quasi-experiment. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 39(7), 1002–1017 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. B.A. Kitchenham, S.L. Pfleeger, D.C. Hoaglin, K.E. Emam, J. Rosenberg. Preliminary guidelines for empirical research in software engineering. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 28(8), 721–733 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. T. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd enlarged edn. (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1970)

    Google Scholar 

  16. M. Mooney Marini, B. Singer, Causality in the social sciences. Sociol. Methodol. 18, 347–409 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. A.W. ter Mors, The World According to MARP. PhD thesis, Delft University of Technology, March 2010. http://www.st.ewi.tudelft.nl/~adriaan/pubs/terMorsPhDthesis.pdf

  18. M.D. Myers. A disaster for everyone to see: An interpretive analysis of a failed IS project. Account. Manag. Inf. Technol. 4(4), 185–201 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. R. Pawson, N. Tilley, Realistic Evaluation (Sage, Thousand oaks, 1997)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Z. Racheva, M. Daneva, A. Herrmann, A conceptual model of client-driven agile requirements prioritization: Results of a case study, in IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM), ed. by G. Succi, M. Morisio, N. Nagappan, Bolzano. (ACM, New York, 2010), pp. 39:1–39:4

    Google Scholar 

  21. D.B. Rubin, Bayesian inference for causal effects: The role of randomization. Ann. Stat. 6(1), 34–58 (1978)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. D.B. Rubin, Which ifs have causal answers. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 81(396), 961–962 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  23. R. Sabherwal, The evolution of coordination in outsourced software development projects: A comparison of client and vendor perspectives. Inf. Organ. 13, 153–202 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. G. Schurz, Patterns of abduction. Synthese 164, 201–234 (2008)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. P. Sedgwick, Random sampling versus random allocation. Br. Med. J. 343, d7453 (2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d7453

  26. W.R. Shadish, T.D. Cook, D.T. Campbell, Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference (Houghton Mifflin, Boston, 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  27. J. Snow, On the mode of communication of cholera (1849)

    Google Scholar 

  28. J. Snow, On the model of propagation of cholera, part 1. Med. Times 24, 559–562 (29 November 1851)

    Google Scholar 

  29. J. Snow, On the model of propagation of cholera, part 2. Med. Times 24, 610–612 (13 December 1851)

    Google Scholar 

  30. S.G. West, J.C. Biesanz, S.C. Pitts, Causal inference and generalization in field settings: Experimental and quasi-experimental designs, in Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology, ed. by H.T. Reis, C.M. Judd (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000), pp. 40–84

    Google Scholar 

  31. C. Wohlin, P. Runeson, M. Höst, M. C. Ohlsson, B. Regnell, A. Weslén, Experimentation in Software Engineering: An Introduction (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  32. C. Wohlin, P. Runeson, M. Höst, M. C. Ohlsson, B. Regnell, A. Weslén, Experimentation in Software Engineering, 2nd edn. (Springer, Heidelberg, 2012)

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wieringa, R.J. (2014). Abductive Inference Design. In: Design Science Methodology for Information Systems and Software Engineering. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43839-8_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43839-8_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-43838-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-43839-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics