Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Werbewirkungsmodelle

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Wirtschaftspsychologie

Part of the book series: Springer-Lehrbuch ((SLB))

Zusammenfassung

Werbewirkungsmodelle befassen sich mit der Frage, wie Werbung ihr eigentliches Ziel erreicht. Was also genau ist mit Werbewirkung gemeint? Und unter welchen Bedingungen ist eine bestimmte Werbung wirksam? Zur Beantwortung dieser Fragen werden Werbewirkungsmodelle betrachtet. Sie machen Aussagen darüber, wie und warum Werbebotschaften die Beworbenen erreichen – oder eben nicht erreichen. Die einfachsten Vorstellungen gehen davon aus, dass die Werbung nur geschickt genug gemacht sein muss: Solche Reiz-Reaktions-Modelle stellen den Ausgangspunkt dar. Da zwischen Reiz und Reaktion allerdings diverse Prozesse ablaufen, wurden zunehmend differenzierte Werbewirkungsmodelle formuliert. Aus diesen Modellen lassen sich Gestaltungsempfehlungen ableiten, und sie können die vielfältigen Befunde zur Wirkung einzelner Gestaltungselemente integrieren. Die Darstellung der Werbewirkungsmodelle vermittelt zudem eine Idee davon, auf welchen Ebenen und mit welchen Methoden Werbewirkung vorhergesagt und evaluiert werden kann.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Aaker, D. A., & Stayman, D. M. (1990). A micro approach to studying feeling responses to advertising: The case of warmth. In S. J. Agres, J. A. Edell, & T. M. Dubitsky (Eds.), Emotion in Advertising (S. 53–68). New York: Quorum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aaker, D. A., Stayman, D. M., & Hagerty, M. R. (1986). Warmth in advertising: Measurement, impact, and sequence effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 12, 365–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albarracín, D. (2002). Cognition in persuasion: An analysis of information processing in response to persuasive communications. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Bd. 34, S. 61–130). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, C. T., & Shimp, T. A. (1990). On using classical conditioning methods for researching the impact of ad-evoked feelings. In S. J. Agres, J. A. Edell, & T. M. Dubitsky (Eds.), Emotion in advertising (S. 19–34). New York: Quorum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, J. C., Durvasula, S., & Akhter, S. H. (1990). A framework for conceptualizing and measuring the involvement construct in advertising research. Journal of Advertising, 19, 27–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 471–499.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bargh, J. A., & Ferguson, M. J. (2000). Beyond behaviorism: On the automaticity of higher mental processes. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 925–945.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Batra, R., & Ray, M. L. (1985). How advertising works at contact. In L. F. Alwitt, & A. A. Mitchell (Eds.), Psychological processes and advertising effect (S. 13–44). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergkvist, L., & Rossiter, J. R. (2008). The role of ad likability in predicting an ad’s campaign performance. Journal of Advertising, 37(2), 85–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brand, H. W. (1978). Die Legende von den geheimen Verführern. Weinheim: Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. P., & Stayman, D. M. (1992). Antecedents and consequences of attitude toward the ad: A meta-analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 34–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, D. (1959). The effect of subliminal food stimuli on verbal responses. Journal of Applied Psychology, 7, 114–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaiken, S. (1987). The heuristic model of persuasion. In M. P. Zanna, J. M. Olson, & C. P. Herman (Eds.), Social influence: The Ontario Symposium (Bd. 5, S. 3–39). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaiken, S., & Trope, Y. (Eds.). (1999). Dual-process theories in social psychology. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edell, J. A., & Burke, M. C. (1987). The power of feelings in understanding advertising effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 14, 421–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engel, J. F., Blackwell, R. D., & Miniard, P. W. (1995). Consumer behavior. Chicago: Dryden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erb, H.-P., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2005). Persuasion – Ein oder zwei Prozesse? Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 36, 117–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, M., & Middlestadt, S. (1995). Noncognitive effects on attitude formation and change: Fact or artifact? Journal of Consumer Psychology, 4, 181–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, M., & Middlestadt, S. (1997). A striking lack of evidence for nonbelief-based attitude formation and change: A response to five commentaries. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 6, 107–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorn, G. J. (1982). The effects of music in advertising or choice: A classical conditioning approach. Journal of Marketing, 46, 94–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, A. G. (1989). Why are attitudes important?. In A. R. Pratkanis, J. S. Breckler, & A. G. Greenwald (Eds.), Attitude structure and function (S. 1–10). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haugtvedt, C. P., & Priester, J. R. (1997). Conceptual and methodological issues in advertising effectiveness: An attitude strength perspective. In W. D. Wells (Eds.), Measuring advertising effectiveness (S. 79–93). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, S. A., & Hoch, S. J. (1992). Low-involvement learning: Memory without evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 212–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janiszewski, C., & Warlop, L. (1993). The influence of classical conditioning preocedures on subsequent attention to the conditioned brand. Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 171–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, B. T., Maio, G. R., & Smith-McLallen, A. (2005). Communication and attitude change: Causes, processes, and effects. In D. Albarracín, B. T. Johson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (S. 617–669). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellaris, J. J., & Cox, A. D. (1989). The effects of background music in advertising: A reassessment. Journal of Consumer Research, 16, 113–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kempf, D. S., & Smith, R. E. (1998). Consumer processing of product trial and the influence of prior advertising: A structural modeling approach. Journal of Marketing Research, 35, 325–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruglanski, A. W., & Gigerenzer, G. (2011). Intuitive and deliberate judgments are based on common principles. Psychological Review, 118(1), 97–109. Erratum: 118(3).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lavidge, R., & Steiner, G. A. (1961). A model for predictive measurements of advertising effectiveness. Journal of Marketing, 25, 59–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, A. Y., & Labroo, A. A. (2004). The effect of conceptual and perceptual fluency on brand evaluation. Journal of Marketing Research, 41, 151–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maheswaran, D., & Chaiken, S. (1991). Promoting systematic processing in low-motivation settings: Effect of incongruent information on processing and judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 13–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mattenklott, A., & Schimansky, A. (Hrsg.). (2002). Werbung – Strategien und Konzepte für die Zukunft. München: Vahlen.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, W. J. (1985). The nature of attitude and attitude change. In G. Lindzey, & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (S. 233–346). New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyers-Levy, J., & Malaviya, P. (1999). Consumers’ processing of persuasive advertisements: An integrative framework of persuasion theories. Journal of Marketing, 63, 45–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moser, K. (1997). Sex-Appeal in der Werbung. Göttingen: Verlag für Angewandte Psychologie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser, K. (2002). Markt- und Werbepsychologie. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, J. C., & Dover, P. A. (1979). Disconfirmation of consumer expectations through product trial. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 179–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pawlow, J. P. (1927). Conditioned reflexes. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perloff, R. M. (2003). The dynamics of persuasion: Communication and attitudes in the 21st century. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petty, R. E., & Brock, T. C. (1981). Thought disruption and persuasion: Assessing the validity of attitude change experiments. In R. E. Petty, T. M. Ostrom, & T. C. Brock (Eds.), Cognitive responses in persuasion (S. 55–79). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pornpitakpan, C. (2012). A critical review of classical conditioning effects on consumer behavior. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ), 20(4), 282–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray, M. L. (1973). Marketing communication and the hierarchy-of-effects. In P. Clarke (Ed.), New models for mass communication research (Bd. 5, S. 147–176). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, N., & Wood, W. (1992). Self-esteem and intelligence affect influenceability: The mediating role of message reception. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 156–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossiter, J. R., & Percy, L. (1997). Advertising communications & promotion management. Boston: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, S. (1999). When an ad’s influence is beyond our conscious control: Perceptual and conceptual fluency effects caused by incidental ad exposure. Journal of Consumer Research, 26, 16–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shimp, T. A., Stuart, E. W., & Engle, R. W. (1991). A program of classical conditioning experiments testing variations in the conditioned stimulus and context. Journal of Consumer Research, 18, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. E., & Swinyard, W. R. (1982). Information response models: An integrated approach. Journal of Marketing, 46, 81–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. E., & Swinyard, W. R. (1983). Attitude-behavior consistency: The impact of product trial versus advertising. Journal of Marketing Research, 20, 257–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strack, F. (1992). The different routes to social judgments: Experiential versus informational strategies. In L. L. Martin, & A. Tesser (Eds.), The construction of social judgments (S. 249–276). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trappey, C. (1996). A meta-analysis of consumer choice and subliminal advertising. Psychology & Marketing, 13, 517–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vakratsas, D., & Ambler, T. (1999). How advertising works: What do we really know? Journal of Marketing, 63, 26–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vicary, J. (1957). Subliminal svengali? Sponsor, 11, 38–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verwijmeren, T., Karremans, J. C., Stroebe, W., & Wigboldus, D. J. (2011). The workings and limits of subliminal advertising: The role of habits. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 21(2), 206–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wansink, B., & Ray, M. L. (1996). Advertising strategies to increase usage frequency. Journal of Marketing, 60, 31–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Lehrstuhl für Psychologie, insbes. Wirtschafts- und Sozialpsychologie, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Nürnberg, Deutschland

    Klaus Moser

Authors
  1. Klaus Moser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Lehrstuhl für Psychologie, insbes. Wirtschafts- und Sozialpsychologie, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Nürnberg, Germany

    Klaus Moser

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Moser, K. (2015). Werbewirkungsmodelle. In: Moser, K. (eds) Wirtschaftspsychologie. Springer-Lehrbuch. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43576-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43576-2_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-43575-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-43576-2

  • eBook Packages: Psychology (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation