Skip to main content

Bundling — A Powerful Method to Better Exploit Profit Potential

  • Chapter

Abstract

Most firms are multi-product companies faced with the decision whether to sell products (goods and/or services) separately at individually determined prices or whether combinations of products should be marketed in the form of “bundles” for which a “bundle price” is asked. Bundling plays an increasingly important role in many industries and some companies even build their business strategies on bundling. A renowned case is Microsoft. By smartly combining its application software into the “Office” bundle, Microsoft extended the quasi-monopoly of Word to Excel, Access and PowerPoint. Microsoft increased the market share of PowerPoint and Access when it bundled these two less attractive components with the attractive components Excel and Winword. The so-called “Office” bundle and its software components represent the standard in the application software market and have a share over 80 percent (see Wuebker, 1998, 189). In a similar way, Microsoft is trying to monopolize the Web-browser market. In mid-1996, its Web-browser Internet Explorer had a market share of 7 percent, while Netscape’s Navigator had a quasi-monopoly (over 80 percent market share). By bundling the Explorer with its operating system Windows, Microsoft’s share rose to 38 percent and Netscape’s lead in the browser market dropped to 58 percent by early 1997. Many software experts believe that Microsoft will soon get the leadership in the Web-browser market.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adams, W. J. and Y. L. Yellen (1976). “Commodity bundling and the burden of monopoly.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 90 (August), 475–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J.C. and J. A. Narus (1995). “Capturing the value of supplementary services.” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 73 (January/February), 107–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ansari, A., S. Siddarth and C. B. Weinberg (1996). “Pricing a bundle of products or services: the case of nonprofits.” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 33 (February), 86–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackstone, E. A. (1975). “Restrictive practices in the marketing of electrofax copying machines and supplies: The SCM corporation case.” Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol. 23 (March), 189–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burstein, M. L. (1960). “The economics of tie-in sales.” Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 42 (February), 68–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carbajo, J., D. de Meza and D. J. Seidmann (1990). “A strategic motivation for commodity bundling.” The Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol. 38 (March), 283–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. H. (1960). “The problem of social costs.” Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 22 (October), 1–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cready, W. M. (1991). “Premium bundling.” Economic Inquiry, Vol. 29 (January), 173–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, F. J. and W.E. Ruther (1979). “The Northern Pacific case.” Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 41 (October), 329–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demsetz, H. (1968). “The cost of transacting.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 82 (February), 33–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drumwright, M.E. (1992). “A demonstration of anomalies in evaluations of bundling.” Marketing Letters, Vol. 3 (October), 311–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolan, R. J. and H. Simon (1996). Power pricing — How managing price transforms the bottom line. The Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eppen, G. D., W. A. Hanson and K. R. Martin (1991). `Bundling — new products, new markets, low risk.“ Sloan Management Review, Vol. 32 (Summer), 7–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, I.R. (1991). “Cross-couponing as bundling.” University Microfilms International, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuerderer, R., A. Huchzermeier and L. Schrage (1994). “Stochastic option bundling and bundle pricing.” Working Paper 94–12, WHU Koblenz, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuerderer, R. (1996). Option and component bundling under demand risk. Gabler, Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuerderer, R.; A. Huchzermeier (1997). “Optimale Preisbündelung unter Unsicherheit.” Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, Vol. 62 (Ergänzungsheft 1), 17–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guiltinan, J. P. (1987). “The price bundling of services: a normative framework.” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 51 (April), 74–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, W.A. and K. R. Martin (1990). “Optimal bundle pricing.” Management Science, Vol. 36 (February), 155–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohli, R. and H. Park (1994). “Coordinating buyer-seller transactions across multiple products.” Management Science, Vol. 40 (September), 1145–1150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawless, M. W. (1991). “Commodity bundling for competitive advantage: strategic implications.” Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 28 (May), 267–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liebowitz, S. J. (1983). “Tie-in sales and price discrimination.” Economic Inquiry, Vol. 21 (July), 387–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monroe, K. B. (1990). Pricing: making profitable decisions. 2“ edition, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton, J. (1989). “The economics of price.” In: Seymour, D.T. (Hrsg.). The Pricing Decision — A Strategic Planner for Marketing Professionals. Probus Publishing Company, Chicago, 55–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Möschel, W. (1981). “Umsatzbonussysteme und der Mißbrauch marktbeherrschender Stellungen.” Marketing Zeitschrift für Forschung und Praxis, Vol. 3 (November), 225–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagle, T. T. (1987). The strategy and tactics of pricing-a guide to profitable decision making Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nessim, H. and R. Dodge (1995). Pricing -policies and procedures. MacMillan Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterman, J. L. (1979). “The International Salt case.” Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 5 (October), 351–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phlips, L. (1989). The economics of price discrimination. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plinke, W. (1983). “Periodenbezogene Mengenrabatte marktbeherrschender Unternehmen.” Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung, Vol. 35 (March), 224–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. (1985). Competitive advantage. The Free Press, New York et al..

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringbeck, J., C.-S.Neumann and A. Cornet (1998). “Market-oriented complexity management using the micromarket management concept.” Fuerderer, R., A. Herrmann and G. Wuebker (editors). Optimal bundling. Springer, New York et al..

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmalensee, R. (1984). “Gaussian demand and commodity bundling.” Journal of Business, Vol. 57 (January), 211–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seidmann, D. J. (1991). “Bundling as a facilitating device: a reinterpretation of leverage theory.” Economica, Vol. 58 (November), 491–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. (1989). Price management. North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. (1992). Preismanagement — Analyse, Strategie, Umsetzung. 2nd edition, Gabler, Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. (1995a). Preismanagement kompakt, Probleme und Methoden des modernen Pricing. Gabler, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. (1995b). “Pricing for the future — challenges and sophisticated solutions.” Unpublished Presentation Paper, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H., M. Faßnacht and G. Wuebker (1995). “Price bundling.” Pricing Strategy & Practice, Vol. 3 (1), 34 44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobel, R. (1981). IBM-Colossus in transition. The Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G.J. (1963). “United States vs. Loew’s Inc.: A note on block booking.” In: Kurland, P. (Hrsg.). The Supreme Court Review. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 152–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tacke, G. (1989). Nichtlineare Preisbildung: Theorie, Messung und Anwendung. Gabler, Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Telser, L.G. (1965). “Abuse in trade practices: an economic analysis.” Law and Contemporary Problems, Vol. 30 (Summer), 488–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, R. and Mahajan, V. (1993). “A probalisitic approach to pricing a bundle of products or services.” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 30 (November), 494–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warhit, E. (1980). “The economics of tie-in sales.” Atlantic Economic Journal, Vol. 8 (December), 81–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, T. J. Jr. (1990). Father, Son & Co., My life at IBM and beyond. Bantam Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whinston, M. D. (1990). “Tying, foreclosure, and exclusion.” American Economic Review, Vol. 80 (September), 837–859.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R. B. (1993). “Nonlinear picing.” Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, L. O., A. M. Weiss and G. John (1990). “Unbundling of industrial systems.” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 23 (May), 123–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wirtschaft und Wettbewerb, “Entscheidungssammlung”, Bundesgerichtshof (BGH 2406 ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirtschaft und Wettbewerb, “Entscheidungssammlung (Kombinationstarif)”, Oberlandesgericht (OLG 1767 ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirtschaft und Wettbewerb, “Entscheidungssammlung ( Treuerabatte)”, Oberlandesgericht (OLG 2048 ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wuebker, G. (1998). Preisbündelung: Formen, Theorie, Messung und Umsetzung. Gabler, Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wuebker, G. and V. Mahajan (1998). “A conjoint analysis based procedure to measure reservation price and to optimally price product bundles.” Fuerderer, R., A. Herrmann and G. Wuebker (editors). Optimal bundling. Springer, New York et al., 157–175.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Simon, H., Wuebker, G. (1999). Bundling — A Powerful Method to Better Exploit Profit Potential. In: Fuerderer, R., Herrmann, A., Wuebker, G. (eds) Optimal Bundling. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-09119-7_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-09119-7_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-08459-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-09119-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics