Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Modeling Structural Linkages in Dynamic and Spatial Interindustry Systems

  • Chapter
Book cover Trade, Networks and Hierarchies

Part of the book series: Advances in Spatial Science ((ADVSPATIAL))

Abstract

In economics, as in most other disciplines, we use models to illustrate complex relationships among economic variables and other related objects, such as the environment. A model is just a simplified characterization of reality. Like a road map, it highlights the main features of interest but treats as background those characteristics not crucial to the purpose at hand. Through simplification, less is held in view so that more can be understood of what is retained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Almon, C. 1991. “The INFORUM Approach to Interindustry Modeling.” Economic Systems Research, 3, 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anselin, L., S. Rey, and U. Deichmann. 1990. “The Implementation of Integrated Models in a Multi-regional System.” In L. Anselin and M. Madden eds. New Directions in Regional Analysis. London, Belhaven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armington, P. 1969. “A Theory of Demand for Products Distinguished by Place of Production.” IMF Papers, 16, 159–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batey, P.W.J., and M. Madden. 1981. “Demographic-Economic Forecasting Within An Activity-commodity Framework: Some Theoretical Considerations and Empirical Results.” Environment and Planning A, 13, 1067–1083.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batey, P.W.J., M. Madden, and M.J. Weeks. 1987. “Household Income and Expenditure in Extended Input-Output Models: A Comparative Theoretical and Empirical Analysis.” Journal of Regional Science, 27, 341–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batey, P.W. and A.Z. Rose. 1990. “Extended Input-Output Models: Progress and Potential.” International Regional Science Review, 13, 27–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batey, P.W. and M.J. Weeks. 1987. “An Extended Input-Output Model Incorporating Employed, Unemployed and In-migrant Households.” Papers of the Regional Science Association, 62, 93–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaumont, P.M. 1990. “Supply and Demand Interactions in Integrated Econometric and Input-Output Models.” International Regional Science Review, 13, 167–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackwell, J. 1978. “Disaggregation of the Household Sector in Regional Input-Output Analysis: Some Models Specifying Previous Residence of Workers.” Regional Studies, 12, 367–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boadway, R. and J. Treddenick. 1978. “A General Equilibrium Computation of the Effects of the Canadian Tariff Structure.” Canadian Journal of Economics, 11, 424–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryden, J. 1973. Tourism and Development: A Case Study of the Commonwealth Caribbean. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buetre, B.L. and F.Z. Ahmadi-Esfanhani. 2000. “Updating an Input-output Table for Use in Policy Analysis.” Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 44, 573–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caddy, V. 1976. “Empirical Estimation of the Elasticity of Substitution: A Review.” Impact Project Preliminary Working Paper No. OP-09, Industry Commission, Canberra, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrier, H.D. and W.A. Wallace. 1994. “An Epistemological View of Decision Aid Technology with Emphasis on Expert Systems.” In W.A. Wallace, ed. Ethics in Modeling, Oxford, Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, A.P. 1970. Structural Change in the American Economy. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charemza, W.W. and D.F. Deadman. 1997. New Directions in Econometric Practice. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway, R.S. Jr. 1979. “The Simulation Properties of a Regional Interindustry Econometric Model.” Papers of the Regional Science Association, 43, 45–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conway, R.S. Jr. 1990. “The Washington Projection and Simulation Model: A Regional Interindustry Econometric Model.” International Regional Science Review, 13, 141–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dervis, K., J. de Melo, and S. Robinson. 1982. General Equilibrium Models for Development Policy. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewhurst, J.H.L. and G.R. West. 1990. “Closing Interregional Input-Output Models with Econometrically Determined Relationships.” In L. Anselin and M. Madden, eds. New Directions in Regional Analysis. London, Belhaven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewhurst, J.H.L. and G.R. West. 1991. “Conjoining Regional and Interregional Input-Output Models with Econometric Models.” In J.J.Ll. Dewhurst, G.J.D. Hewings and R.C. Jensen, eds. Regional Input-Output Modeling: New Developments and Interpretations. Aldershot, Avebury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietzenbacher, E. 1997. “In Vindication of the Ghosh Model: A Reinterpretation of a Price Model.” Journal of Regional Science, 37, 629–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, P.B., B.R. Parmenter, J. Sutton, and D.P. Vincent. 1982. ORANI: A Multisectoral Model of the Australian Economy. Amsterdam, North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, P.B., B.R. Parmenter, A. Powell, and P. Wilcoxen. 1992. Notes and Problems in Applied General Equilibrium Economics. Amsterdam, Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, P.B., B.R. Parmenter, and R.J. Rimmer. 1985. “The Sensitivity of ORANI Projections of the Short-Run Effects of Increases in Protection to Variations in the Values Adopted for Export Demand Elasticities.” In K. Jungenfelt and D. Hague eds. Structural Adjustment in Developed Open Economies. London, Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duchin, F. 2000. “International Trade: Evolution in the Thought and Analysis of Wassily Leontief.” Paper presented to the XIII International Conference on Input-Output Techniques, Macerata, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enders, W. 1995. Applied Econometric Time Series. New York, Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, W.D. 1954. “Input-Output Computations.” In T. Barna ed. The Structural Interdependence of the Economy. New York, Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. 1953. “The Methodology of Positive Economics.” In M. Friedman. Essays in Positive Economics. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fry, J.M., R.L. Fry, and M.R. Peter. 1999. “Inter-Regional Migration in Australia: An Applied Economic Analysis.” Australasian Journal of Regional Studies, 5, 111–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gass, S.I. 1983. “Decision-Aiding Models — Validation, Assessment and Related Issues.” Operations Research, 3, 603–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, A. 1958. “Input-Output Approach in an Allocation System.” Economica, 25, 58–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glickman, N.J. 1977. Econometric Analysis of Regional Systems: Explorations in Model Building and Policy Analysis. New York, Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, T.R. and C. Pongtanakorn. 1983. “The Economic Impact of Irrigation Development in Idaho: An Application of Marginal Input-Output Methods.” Annals of Regional Science, 17, 60–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Israilevich, P.R. 2001. “Frame-shifting in regional general equilibrium models.” Chapter 21 in this volume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Israilevich, P.R., G.J.D. Hewings, M. Sonis and C.R. Schindler 1997. “Forecasting Structural Change with a Regional Econometric Input-Output Model.” Journal of Regional Science, 37, 565–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorgensen, D.W. 1984. “Econometric Methods for Applied General Equilibrium Analysis.” In H.E. Scarf and J.B. Shoven, eds. Applied General Equilibrium Analysis. New York, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, L.R. 1989. “Econometric Aspects of Input-Output Analysis.” In R. Miller, K. Polenske and A. Rose, eds. Frontiers of Input-Output Analysis. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans, T.C. 1957. Three Essays on the State of Economics Science. New York, McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lahiri, S. 1976. “Input-Output Analysis with Scale Dependent Coefficients.” Econometrica, 55, 947–961.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lahr, M.L. 1993. “A Review of the Literature Supporting the Hybrid Approach to Constructing Regional Input-Output Models.” Economic Systems Research, 5, 277–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leontief, W. 1936. “Quantitative Input-Output Relations in the Economic System of the United States.” Review of Economics and Statistics, 18, 105–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leontief, W. 1951. The Structure of the American Economy, 1919–1939. New York, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leontief, W. 1953. Studies in the Structure of the American Economy. New York, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madden, M. and A.B. Trigg. 1990. “Interregional Migration in an Extended Input-Output Model.” International Regional Science Review, 13, 65–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, M.B. 1991. “LIFT: INFORUM’s Model of the U.S. Economy.” Economic Systems Research, 3, 15–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarl, B.A. 1984. “Model Validation: An Overview with Some Emphasis on Risk Models.” Review of Marketing and Agricultural Models, 52, 153–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGregor, P.G. and J.K. Swales. 1994. “An Investigation into a Neo-Classical Interpretation of Regional Input-Output Analysis.” Strathclyde Papers in Economics 94/1, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meade, D.S. 1999. “Idlift — Recasting the Inforum Model of the US Economy.” Paper to the VII Inforum World Conference, Beijing, China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercenier, J. 1995. “Nonuniqueness of Solutions in Applied General Equilibrium Models with Scale Economies and Imperfect Competition.” Economic Theory, 6, 161–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miernyk, W.H. 1965. The Elements of Input-Output Analysis. New York, Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miernyk, W.H., E.R. Bonner, J.H. Chapman Jr, and K. Shellhamer. 1967. Impact of the Space Program on a Local Economy: An Input-Output Analysis. Morgantown, West Virginia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R.E. and P.D. Blair, P.D. 1985. Input-Output Analysis: Foundations and Extensions. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyazawa, K. 1976. Input-Output Analysis and the Structure of Income Distribution. Berlin, Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, F.T. and J.W. Petersen. 1955. “Regional Analysis: An Interindustry Model of Utah.” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 37, 368–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morishima, M. 2000. “Economy and Democracy.” Keynote presentation to the XIII International Conference on Input-Output Techniques, Macerata, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oosterhaven, J. and J.H.Ll. Dewhurst. 1990. “A Prototype Demo-Economic Model With an Application to Queensland.” International Regional Science Review, 13, 51–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oosterhaven, J. and H. Folmer. 1985. “An Interregional Labor Market Model Incorporating Vacancy Chains and Social Security.” Papers of the Regional Science Association, 58, 141–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parmenter, B.R. 1983. “The Impact Macro Package and Export Demand Elasticities.” Australian Economic Papers, 22, 411–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rey, S.J. 1997. “Coefficient Change in Embedded Econometric and Input-Output Models at the Regional Level.” Economic Systems Research, 9, 307–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rey, S.J. 1998. “The Performance of Alternative Integration Strategies for Combining Regional Econometric and Input-Output Models.” International Regional Science Review, 21, 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, H.W. 1972. Input-Output and Regional Economics. London, Weidenfeld and Nicholson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, J.R. 1997. “A Price-Responsive Framework for Interregional Input-Output.” Annals of Regional Science, 31, 285–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, R. 1989. Community Economics: Economic Structure and Change in Smaller Communities. Ames, Iowa State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoven, J.B. and J. Whalley. 1992. Applying General Equilibrium. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skene, J. 1993. “The Economic Impact of Growth in Visitor Expenditure: A Quantitative Assessment.” Working Paper No. 92, Bureau of Industry Economics. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, R.M., J. Francis, and B. Schumacher. 1976. Price Elasticities in International Trade: An Annotated Bibliography. London, Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiebout, C.M. 1969. “An Empirical Region Input-Output Projection Model: the State of Washington, 1980.” Review of Economics and Statistics, 51, 334–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilanus, C.B. 1967. “Marginal vs Average Input-Output Coefficients in Input-Output Forecasting.” Quarterly Journal of Economics. 81, 140–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk, J. and J. Oosterhaven. 1986. “Regional Impacts of Migrants’ Expenditures: An Input-output Vacancy Chain Approach.” In P.W. Batey and M. Madden eds. Integrated Analysis of Regional Systems. London, Pion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walras, L. 1877. Elements of Pure Economics. Translated by W. Jaffe 1954. Homewood, IL., Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, G. 1994. “The Queensland Impact and Projection Model: The Household Sector.” Economic Systems Research, 6, 363–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, G.R. and A. Gamage. 1997. “Differential Multipliers for Tourism in Victoria. Tourism Economics, 3, 57–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, G.R. and R.W. Jackson. 1998. “Input-Output+Econometric and Econometric+Input-Output: Model Differences or Different Models?” Regional Analysis and Policy, 28, 33–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, G.R. and J.R. Roy. 1998. “Towards an Interregional Framework for Joint Assessment of Tourism and the Environment.” Australasian Journal of Regional Studies, 4, 161–176.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Economic Policy Modeling, University of Queensland, Brisbane, 4072, Queensland, Australia

    Guy R. West

Authors
  1. Guy R. West
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Regional Economics Applications Laboratory, University of Illinois, 607 S. Mathews, Urbana, IL, 61801-3671, USA

    Geoffrey J. D. Hewings

  2. Department of Geography, Faculty of Social Sciences, Bar Ilan University, 52900, Ramat-Gan, Israel

    Michael Sonis

  3. Department of Civil and Materials Engineering, Transport Laboratory (TransLab), University of Illinois at Chicago, 842 W. Taylor Street (M/C 246), Chicago, IL, 60607-7023, USA

    David Boyce

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

West, G.R. (2002). Modeling Structural Linkages in Dynamic and Spatial Interindustry Systems. In: Hewings, G.J.D., Sonis, M., Boyce, D. (eds) Trade, Networks and Hierarchies. Advances in Spatial Science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04786-6_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04786-6_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-07712-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-04786-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation