Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Balancierende Führung

Eine im methodischen Dialog und am Beispiel der Softwareentwicklung gewonnene Theorie zur Mitarbeiterführung in komplexen und zeitkritischen Projekten

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Balance Management

  • 2747 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Komplexe Projekte, etwa in der Softwareentwicklung oder Unternehmensberatung, haben oft mit Zeitdruck zu kämpfen. Die Knappheit der Ressource Zeit ist in das Konzept Projekt unweigerlich eingebaut. Zeit ist Geld, weil die Projektressourcen, insbesondere die Mitarbeiter, Kosten zu Lasten des Projekts verursachen. Noch viel mehr Geld steht auf dem Spiel, wenn eine verspätete Lieferung Vertragsstrafen und Reputationsverlust nach sich zieht.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Amabile, Teresa M., Mueller, Jennifer S., Simpson, William B., Hadley, Constance N., Kramer, Steven J. &Fleming, Lee (2002). Time pressure and creativity in organizations: A longitudinal field study. Working paper #02–073, Harvard Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ancona, Deborah G. (1987). Groups in organizations. Extending laboratory models. In: Hendrick, C. (Ed.): Annual Review of Personality and Social Psychology: Group processes Axtell, Carolyn M., Holman, D. J., Unsworth, K. L., Wall, T. D., Waterson, P. E. & Harrington, E. (2000): Shopfloor innovation: Facilitating the suggestion and implementation of ideas. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 265–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ancona, Deborah G. & Caldwell, David F. (1992). Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 634–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badke-Schaub, Petra (2001). Erkennen und Bewaltigen kritischer Situationen in Projektgruppen. In: Fisch, R., Beck, D. & Englich, B.: Projektgruppen in Organisationen (S. 249–267), Gottingen et al.: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balck, Henning (1989). Umorientierung im Projektmanagement – Abkehr von mechanistischer Steuerung und Kontrolle. In: Reschke, H., Schnelle, H. & Schmopp, R. (Hrsg.): Handbuch fur Projektmanagement. Band 1 (S. 1033–1056). Koln: TUV Rheinland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balzert, Helmut (1998). Lehrbuch der Softwaretechnik, 2. Bd. Heidelberg, Berlin: Spektrum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, Albert (1997). Self-efficacy. The Exercise of Control. New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • ecker, Wolfgang (1996). Stabilitatspolitik fur Unternehmen: Zukunftssicherung durch integrierte Kosten- und Leistungsfuhrerschaft. Wiesbaden: Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bittner, Udo, Hesse, Wolfgang, & Schnath, Johannes (1995). Anderbarkeit und Flexibilitat von Software-Systemen. In: Bittner, U., Hesse, W. & Schnath, J. (Hrsg.): Praxis der Software-Entwicklung (S. 31–53). Munchen, Wien: Oldenbourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, Andreas (2000). Theoretisches Codieren: Textanalyse in der Grounded Theory. In: Flick, U., v. Kardorff, E. & Steinke, I. (Hrsg.): Qualitative Forschung (S. 475–485). Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt Taschenbuch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boerner, Sabine (2002). Fuhrungsverhalten und Fuhrungserfolg. Wiesbaden: DUV. Boland, Richard J., Singh, Jagdip, Salipante, Paul, Aram, John D., Fay, Sharon Y. & Kanawattanachai, Prasert (2001): Knowledge representations and knowledge transfer. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 393–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bortz, Jurgen, & Doring, Nicola (2002). Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation, 3. Aufl. Berlin et al.: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodbeck, Felix C. (2001). Communication and performance in software development projects. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 10, 73–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, Frederick P. (1982). The Mythical Man-Month. Reading, Mass, et al.: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Shona L. & Eisenhardt, Kathleen M. (1995). Product development: Past research, present findings, and future directions. Academy of Management Review, 20, 343–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buhner, Rolf, & Akiturk, Deniz (2000) Die Mitarbeiter mit einer Scorecard fuhren. Harvard Business Manager, 22(4),44–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campagna, Christian (1996). Projektmanagement der Entwicklung individueller betriebswirtschaftlicher Anwendungssoftware. Diss., Technische Universitat Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlile, Paul R. (2002). A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries. Organization Science, 13, 442–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charette, Robert N. (1989). Software Engineering Risk Analysis and Management. New York et. al.: Intertext Publications/ Multiscience Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, Bill, Krasner, Herb, & Iscoe, Neil (1988) A field study of the software design process for large systems. Communication of the ACM, 31, 1268–1287.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Cotiis, Thomas A. & Dyer, Lee (1979). Defining and measuring project performance. Research Management, 22, 17–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, Norman K. (1978). The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doner, Dietrich (1989). Die Logik des Misslingens. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorner, Dietrich, & Schaub, Harald (1995) Handeln in Unbestimmtheit und Komplexitat. Organisationsentwicklung, H. 3/95, 34–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elzer, Peter F. (1989). Management von Softwareprojekten. Informatik-Spektrum, 12, 181–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, John. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51, 327–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flick, Uwe (2000). Triangulation in der qualitativen Forschung. In: Flick, U., v. Kardorff, E. & Steinke, I. (Hrsg.): Qualitative Forschung (S. 309–318). Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt Taschenbuch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frese, Michael, & Fay, Doris (2001): Personal Initiative: An active performance concept for work in the 21st century. Research in Organizational Behavior, 23, 133–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frese, Michael, Fay, Leng, Karena, & Tag, Almut (1997). The concept of personal initiative: Operationalization, reliability and validity in two German samples. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 70, 139–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frese, Michael, Kring, Soose, Andrea, & Zempel, Jeanette (1996). Personal initiative at work: Differences between East and West Germany. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 37–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frese, Michael, & Zapf, Dieter (1987). Eine Skala zur Erfassung von Sozialen Stressoren am Arbeitsplatz. Zeitschrift fur Arbeitswissenschaft, 41. Jg., 134–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gebert, Diether (1987). Fuhrung und Innovation. Zeitschrift fur betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung, 39. Jg., 941–951.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gebert, Diether (2002). Fuhrung und Innovation. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gebert, Diether, Boerner, Sabine, & Matiaske, Wenzel (1998). Offenheit und Geschlossenheit in Organisationen – Zur Validierung eines Mesinstruments (FOGO – Fragebogen zur Offenheit/ Geschlossenheit in Organisationen). Zeitschrift fur Arbeitsund Organisationspsychologie, 42. Jg., 15–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gebert, Diether & v. Rosenstiel, Lutz (2002). Organisationspsychologie, 5. Aufl. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gebert, Diether & Ulrich, Joachim G. (1991). Benotigen Theorie und Praxis ein verandertes Verstandnis von Fuhrung? Die Betriebswirtschaft, 51. Jg., 749–761.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gebert, Diether, Boerner, Sabine, & Lanwehr, Ralf (2003). The risks of autonomy: Empirical evidence for the necessity of a balance management in promoting organizational innovativeness. Creativity and Innovation Management, 12, 41–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, Barney G. & Strauss, Anselm L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, Angela, & Yukl, Gary (2004). The future of Leadership Research. Zeitschrift fur Personalforschung, 18. Jg., 359–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grudin, Jonathan (1991). Systematic sources of suboptimal interface design in large product development organizations. Human-Computer Interaction, 6, 147–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haas, Martine, R. (2002). Acting on what others know: Distributed knowledge and team performance. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Meeting, Denver, August 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henrich, Andreas (2002). Management von Softwareprojekten. Munchen, Wien: Oldenbourg. Hoch, Detlev, Roeding, Cyriac R., Purkert, Gert & Lindner, Sandro K. (2000): Secrets of Software Success. Boston, Mass: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogl, Martin (1998). Teamarbeit in innovativen Projekten: Einflusgrosen und Wirkungen. Wiesbaden: DUV.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Holroyd, Kenneth A. & Lazarus, Richard S. (1982). Stress, coping, and somatic adaptation. In: Goldberger, L./ Breznitz, S. (Eds.): Handbook of Stress (S. 21–35). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Capers (1994). Assessment and Control of Software Risks. Englewood Cliffs: Yourdon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, Robert S. & Norton, David (1996). Linking the balanced scorecard to strategy. California Management Review, 39, 53–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, Robert T. (2001). Cross-functional project groups in research and new product development: Diversity, communications, job stress, and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 547–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kieser, Alfred, & Nicolai, Alexander (2003). Mit der Theorie die wilde Praxis reiten, valleri, vallera, valleri? Die Betriebswirtschaft, 63. Jg., 589–594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch, Werner (1978). Die Handhabung von Entscheidungsproblemen. Munchen: Kirsch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause, Diana E. (2003). Macht und Vertrauen in Innovationsprozessen – Ein empirischer Beitrag zur Theorie der Fuhrung. Diss., Technische Universitat Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraut , Robert E. &, Lynn A. (1995). Coordination in software development. Commmunications of the ACM, 38, 69–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, Richard S. (1966). Psychological Stress and the Coping Process. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, Richard S. (1991). Emotion and Adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lechler, Thomas (1997). Erfolgsfaktoren des Projektmanagements. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. Zugl. Diss., Universitat Karlsruhe, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, Edwin A. & Cooper, Cary L. (2000). Conclusion: The challenge of linking theory to practice. In: Cooper, C. L. & Locke, E. A. (Eds.): Industrial and Organizational Psychology (S. 335–341). Oxford, UK, Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, Karen (2001). Grounded Theory in Management Research. London et al.: Sage. Martin, Patricia Y. & Turner, Barry A. (1986). Grounded theory and organizational research. In: The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 22, 141–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meredith, Jack R. & Mantel, Samuel J. (2000). Project Management. New York et al.: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milis, Koen, & Mercken, Roger (2004). The use of balanced scorecard for the evaluation of information and communication technology projects. International Journal of Project Management, 22, 87–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moos, Rudolf H. (1993). Coping Responses Inventory: Adult Form Manual. Odessa, FL.: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mowrer, O. Hobart (1960). Learning Theory and Behavior. New York et al.: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller-Lindenberg, Matthias (2005). Fuhrung in zeitkritischen und komplexen Projekten. Wiesbaden. DUV.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholas, John M. (1990). Managing Business and Engineering Projects. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, Wanda J. (1993). Case tools as organizational change: Investigating incremental and radical changes in systems development. MIS Quarterly, 17, 309–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osterloh, Margit, & Frost, Jetta (2003). Mit welcher Landkarte wurden Sie reisen? Die Betriebswirtschaft, 63. Jg., 594–599.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parry, Ken W. (1998). Gounded theory and social process: A new direction for leadership research. The Leadership Quarterly, 9, 85–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parry, Ken W. &, J. R . (2002) (Eds.). Grounding Leadership Theory and Research: Issures, Perspectives, and Methods. Grenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partington, David (2000). Building grounded theories of managerial action. British Journal of Management, 11, 91–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce , Craig L. &, Henry P. Jr. (2002). Vertical versus shared leadership as predictors of the effectiveness of change management teams: An examination of aversive, directive, transactional, transformational, and empowering leader behaviours. Group Dynamics Theory, Research, and Practice, 6, 172–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, Andrew M. (1990). Longitudinal field research on change: Theory and practice: Organization Science, 1, 267–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pich, Michael T., Loch, Christoph, H. & De Meyer, Arnoud (2002). On uncertainty, ambiguity and complexity in project management. Management Science, 48, 1008–1023

    Google Scholar 

  • Pietsch, Wolfram (1992). Methodik des betrieblichen Software-Projektmanagement, Berlin/ New York: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rook, Paul (1986). Controlling software projects. Software Engineering Journal, Vol. 1. Rosenstiel, Lutz v. (2000). Organisationsanalyse. In: Flick, U., v. Kardorff, E. & Steinke, (Hrsg.): Qualitative Forschung (S. 224–238). Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt Taschenbuch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rynes, Sara L., Bartunek, Jean M. &, Richard L. (2001). Across the great divide: Knowledge creation and transfer between practitioners and academics. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 340–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauer, Chris (1993). Why Information Systems Fail: A Case Study Approach. Henley on Thames: Alfred Waller.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scacchi, Walt (1984). Managing software engineering project: A social analysis. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 10, 49–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schein, Edgar H. (1987). Organizational Culture and Leadership. A Dynamic View. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, Edgar H. (1992). Organizational Culture and Leadership. 2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schonpflug, Wolfgang (1986). Behavior economics as an approach to stress theory. In: Appley, M. & Trumbull, R. (Eds.): Dynamics of Stress (S. 81–98). New York: Plenum Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schuler, Heinz (1999). Glaubenssatze zu Hypothesen. Anmerkungen zur Schwierigkeit, eine gute und zugleich nutzliche Wissenschaft abzugeben. In: Hoyos, C. G. & Frey, D. (Hrsg.): Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie. Weinheim, Basel: Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semmer, Norbert (1984). Stresbezogenen Tatigkeitsanalyse. Weinheim, Basel: Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shenhar, Aaron J. (2000). Strategic Project Leadership. In: Mgt. 751 Project Management and Leadership, Fall 2000, Readings and Articles, Book 1 of 2. Unveroffentlichte Lehrmaterialien des Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shenhar, Aaron J., Levy, Ofer, & Dvir, Dov (1997). Mapping the Dimensions of Project Success. Project Management Journal, 28, 5–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheramata, Willow A. (2002). Finding and solving problems in software new product development. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 19, 144–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sneed, Harry M. (1987). Software Management. Koln: Verlagsgesellschaft Rudolf Muller.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonnentag, Sabine (1994). Stres in SE-Projekten. In: Brodbeck, F. C. & Frese, M. (Hrsg.): Produktivitat und Qualitat in Softwareprojekten (S. 71–85). Munchen, Wien: Oldenbourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stelzer, Dirk (1998). Moglichkeiten und Grenzen des prozessorientierten Software-Qualitatsmanagements, Habilitation, Univ. Koln.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, Anselm L. (1991). Grundlagen qualitativer Sozialforschung. Munchen: Fink.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss , Anselm L. &, Juliet (1994). Grounded Theory methodology. In: Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.): Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, Anselm L. &Corbin, Juliet (1996). Grounded Theory: Grundlagen qualitativer Sozialforschung. Weinheim, Basel: Psychologische Verlags Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, Anselm L. & Corbin, Juliet (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks et al.: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strubing, Jorg (1993). Subjektive Leistungen im Arbeitsprozess: Eine empirische Untersuchung von Arbeitsstilen in der Programmierarbeit. Wiesbaden: DUV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strubing, Jorg (2002). Just do it? Zum Konzept der Herstellung von Qualitat in grounded theory basierten Forschungsarbeiten. Kolner Zeitschrift fur Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 54. Jg., 318–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stutzke, Richard D. (1997). Software estimating technology: A survey. In: Reifer, R. (Ed.): Software Management, 5th ed. Los Alamitos, California: IEEE Computer Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, Robert I. & Staw, Barry M. (1995): What theory is not. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 371–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wateridge, John (1995). IT projects: A basis for success. International Journal of Project Management, 13, 169–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weibler, Jurgen (2012). Personalfuhrung. 2. Auflage. Munchen: Vahlen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, Karl E. (1995). What theory is not, theorizing is. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 385–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weltz, Friedrich & Ortmann, Rolf G. (1992). Das Softwareprojekt – Projektmanagement in der Praxis, Frankfurt a. M., New York:Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, Robert E., Mento, Anthony J. & Locke, Edwin A. (1987). Task complexity as a moderator of goal effects: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 416–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yukl, Gary (2013). Leadership in Organization. Eighth Edition. Essex: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaccaro, Stephen J. & Horn, Zachary N. J. (2003). Leadership theory and practice: Fostering an effective symbiosis. Leadership Quarterly, 14, 769–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zapf, Diether (1991). Stressbezogene Arbeitsanalyse bei der Arbeit mit unterschiedlichen Burosoftwaresystemen. Zeitschrift fur Arbeits- & Organisationspsypchologie, 35. Jg., H. 9, 2–14.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. BiTS Iserlohn, Reiterweg 26 b, Iserlohn, 58636, Deutschland

    Dr. Matthias Müller-Lindenberg

Authors
  1. Dr. Matthias Müller-Lindenberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. , Professor für Wirtschaftspsychologie, BiTS Iserlohn, Reiterweg 26 b, Iserlohn, 58636, Germany

    Ralf Lanwehr

  2. BiTS Iserlohn, Reiterweg 26 b, Iserlohn, 58636, Germany

    Matthias Müller-Lindenberg

  3. BiTS Iserlohn, Reiterweg 26 b, Iserlohn, 58636, Germany

    Daria Mai

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Müller-Lindenberg, M. (2013). Balancierende Führung. In: Lanwehr, R., Müller-Lindenberg, M., Mai, D. (eds) Balance Management. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-02192-4_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-02192-4_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-02191-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-02192-4

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation