Skip to main content

Verhaltenstheoretische Perspektive der Mitarbeiterführung

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbuch Strategisches Personalmanagement

Zusammenfassung

Seit Jahren wird die Führung vonMitarbeitern imPersonalmanagement diskutiert und erforscht. Zukünftig wird die Bedeutung der Mitarbeiterführung weiterhin sehr hoch sein, da sie diverse Aufgaben in Unternehmen wahrnimmt. Der vorliegende Beitrag setzt sich daher mit den konzeptionellen Grundlagen der Mitarbeiterführung auseinander, die sich den Erfolgsfaktoren der Mitarbeiterführung widmen. Im Fokus stehen dabei die klassischen und neueren Ansätze der Mitarbeiterführung. Der Beitrag soll nicht nur einen Einblick in die konzeptionellen Grundlagen derMitarbeiterführung geben, sondern auch die Möglichkeit schaffen, eigene Führungserfahrung einzuschätzen und das Führungsverhalten gezielt zu verbessern.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Agarwal, S., & Ramaswami, S. (1993). Affective organizational commitment of salespeople: an expanded model. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 13(2), 49–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avolio, B., & Bass, B. (1988). Transformational leadership, charisma, and beyond. In J. Hunt, B. Baliga, H. Dachler, & C. Schriesheim (Hrsg.), Emerging Leadership Vistas (S. 29–55). Lexington: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. (1985). Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. (1988). Evolving perspectives on charismatic leadership. In J. Conger, & R. Kanungo (Hrsg.), Charismatic Leadership (S. 40–77). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B., & Avolio, B. (1989). Potential biases in leadership measures: how prototypes, leniency, and general staisfaction relate to ratings and rankings of transformational and transactional leadership constructs. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 49(3), 509–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berson, Y., & Linton, J. (2005). An examination of the relationships between leadership style, quality, and employee satisfaction. R&D versus Administrative Environments, 35(1), 51–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, R., & McCanse, A. (1995). Das GRID-Führungsmodell (3. Aufl.). Düsseldorf: Econ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronner, R., Matiaske, W., & Stein, F. (1991). Anforderungen an Spitzen-Führungskräfte. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, 61(11), 1227–1242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. (1996). A meta-analysis and review of organizational research on job involvement. Psychological Bulletin, 120(2), 235–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A. (1987). The generalizability of implicit leadership theory. Journal of Social Psychology, 127(2), 129–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Challagalla, G., & Servanci, T. (1996). Dimensions and types of supervisory control: effects on salesperson performance and satisfaction. Journal of Marketing, 60(1), 89–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S., Lei, C., & Ledford, G. (1997). A hierarchical construct of self-management leadership and its relationship to quality of work life and perceived work group effectiveness. Personnel Psychology, 50(2), 275–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conger, J., & Kanungo, R. (1988). Charismatic Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conger, J., & Kanungo, R. (1994). Charismatic leadership in organizations: perceived behavioral attributes and their measurement. JOB, 15, 439–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conger, J., Kanungo, R., & Menon, S. (2000). Charismatic leadership and follower effects. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(7), 747–768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeCarlo, T., & Agarwal, S. (1999). Influence of managerial behaviors of job autonomy on job satisfaction of industrial salespersons – a cross-cultural study. Industrial Marketing Management, 28(1), 52–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeGroot, T., Kiker, D., & Cross, T. (2000). A meta-analysis to review organizational outcomes related to charismatic leadership. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 17(4), 356–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartog, D., House, R., Hanges, P., Ruiz-Quintanilla, S., & Dorfman, P. (1999). Culture specific and cross-culturally generalizable implicit leadership theories: are attributes of charismatic/transformational leadership universally endorsed? Leadership Quarterly, 10(2), 219–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Detert, J., & Treviño, L. (2010). Speaking up to higher-ups: how supervisors and skip-level leaders influence employee voice. Organization Science, 21(1), 249–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elloy, D., & Randolph, A. (1997). The effect of superleader behavior on autonomous work groups in a government operated railway service. Public Personnel Management, 26(2), 257–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epitropaki, O., & Martin, R. (2004). Implicit leadership theories in applied settings: factor structure, generalizability, and stability over time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(2), 293–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, M. (1970). The effects of supervisory behavior on the path-goal relationship. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 5(3), 277–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foti, R., & Luch, C. (1992). The influence of individual differences on the perception and categorization of leaders. Leadership Quarterly, 3(1), 55–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Georgopoulus, B., Mahoney, C., & Jones, N. (1957). A path goal approach to productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 41(6), 345–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerstner, C., & Day, D. (1994). Cross-cultural comparison of leadership prototypes. Leadership Quarterly, 5(2), 121–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemphill, J. (1950). Leader behavior description. Columbus: Ohio State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemphill, J., & Coons, A. (1957). Development of the leader behavior description questionnaire. In R. Stogdill, & A. Coons (Hrsg.), Leader Behavior: Its Description and Measurement. Columbus: Ohio State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hersey, P., & Blanchard, K. (1977). Management of Organization Behavior: Utilizing Human Resources (3. Aufl.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hersey, P., & Blanchard, K. (1981). So you want to know your leadership style? Training and Development Journal, 35(6), 34–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homburg, C., & Stock, R. (2001). Kundenorientiertes Führungsverhalten: Die weichen Faktoren messbar machen. Zeitschrift Führung und Organisation, 70(1), 13–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homburg, C., & Stock, R. (2002). Führungsverhalten als Einflussgröße der Kundenorientierung von Mitarbeitern: Ein dreidimensionales Konzept. Marketing ZFP, 2(2), 123–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homburg, C., & Stock-Homburg, R. (2012). Der kundenorientierte Mitarbeiter: Bewerten – Begeistern – Bewegen (2. Aufl.). Wiesbaden: Gabler Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • House, R. (1971). A path-goal theory of leadership: lessons, legacy, and a reformulated theory. Leadership Quarterly, 7(3), 323–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • House, R. (1977). A theory of charismatic leadership. In J. Hunt, & L. Larson (Hrsg.), Leadership (S. 189–207). Carbondale.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, R. (2000). Exchange: a response to beyer’s rejoinder in LQ. Leadership Quarterly, 11(1), 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • House, R., & Mitchell, T. (1974). Path-goal theory of leadership. Journal of Contemporary Business, 3(4), 87–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, R., Hanges, P., Ruiz-Quintanilla, S., Dorfman, P., Javidan, M., Dickson, M., & Gupta, V. (1999). Cultural influences on leadership and organizations: project GLOBE. In W. Mobley, M. Gessner, & V. Arnold (Hrsg.), Advances in Global Leadership (S. 171–232). Stamford.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, R., Javidan, M., Hanges, P., & Dorfman, P. (2002). Understanding cultures and implicit leadership theories across the globe: an introduction to project GLOBE. Journal of World Business, 37(1), 3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaworski, B., & Kohli, A. (1993). Market orientation: antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing, 57(3), 53–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, M., Futrell, C., Parasuraman, A., & Sager, J. (1990). Performance and job satisfaction effects on salesperson turnover: a replication and extension. Journal of Business Research, 16(1), 67–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T., Piccolo, R., & Ilies, R. (2004). The forgotten ones? The validity of consideration and initiating structure in leadership research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(1), 36–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung, D., Yammarino, F., & Lee, J. (2009). Moderating role of subordinates’ attitudes on transformational leadership and effectiveness: a multi-cultural and multi-level perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 20(4), 586–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, W. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, T. (1999). Images of the familiar: individual differences and implicit leadership theories. Leadership Quarterly, 10(4), 589–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lord, R., Foti, R., & DeVader, C. (1984). A test of leadership categorization theory: internal structure, information processing, and leadership perceptions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34(3), 343–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lord, R., Foti, R., & Phillips, J. (1982). A theory of leadership categorization. In J. Hunt, U. Sekaran, & C. Schriesheim (Hrsg.), Leadership: Beyond Established Views (S. 104–121). Carbondale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, R., & Maher, K. (1991). Leadership and Information Processing. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, K., Kroeck, K., & Sivasubramaniam, N. (1996). Effectiveness correlates of transformational and transactional leadership: a meta-analytic review of the MLQ literature. Leadership Quarterly, 7(3), 385–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manz, C., & Sims, H. (1987). Leading workers to lead themselves: the external leadership of self-managing work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32(1), 106–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manz, C., & Sims, H. (1991). Super leadership: beyond the myth of heroic leadership. Organizational Dynamics, 19(4), 18–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R., & Epitropaki, O. (2001). Role of organizational identification on implicit leadership theories (ILTs), transformational leadership and work attitudes. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 4(3), 247–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuberger, O. (2002). Führen und Führen lassen: Ansätze, Ergebnisse und Kritik der Führungsforschung (6. Aufl.). Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Offermann, L., Kennedy, J., & Wirtz, P. (1994). Implicit leadership theories: content, structure, and generalizability. Leadership Quarterly, 5(1), 43–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parry, K., & Proctor-Thomson, S. (2003). Leadership, culture and performance: the case of New Zealand public sector. Journal of Change Management, 3(4), 376–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. (1994). Competitive Advantage Through People: Unleashing the Power of the Work Force. Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberson, Q., Moye, N., & Locke, E. (1999). Identifying a missing link between participation and satisfaction: the mediating role of procedural justice perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(4), 585–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, M., & Haslam, S. (2005). The glass cliff: implicit theories of leadership and gender and the precariousness of women’s leadership positions. In B. Schyns, & J. Meindl (Hrsg.), Implicit Leadership Theories – Essays and Explorations (S. 173–197). Greenwich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sashkin, M. (1990). The managerial mystique: restoring leadership in business. Academy of Management Executive, 4(3), 84–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sczesny, S. (2005). Gender stereotypes and implicit leadership theories. In B. Schyns, & J. Meindl (Hrsg.), Implicit Leadership Theories – Essays and Explorations (S. 159–171). Greenwich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, M. (1990). Implicit leadership theory: are results generalizable from student to professional samples? Journal of Social Psychology, 130(3), 407–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staehle, W. (1999). Management (8. Aufl.). München.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steyrer, J. (1998). Charisma and the archetyps of leadership. Organization Studies, 19(5), 807–828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stock, R., & Hoyer, W. (2002). Leadership style as driver of salespeople’s customer orientation. Journal of Market-Focused Management, 5(4), 353–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stock-Homburg, R. (2010). Personalmanagement: Theorien – Konzepte – Instrumente (2. Aufl.). Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stogdill, R. (1950). Leadership, membership and organization. Psychological Bulletin, 47(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strack, R., Caye, J., Zimmermann, P., von der Linden, C., Thurner, R., & Haen, P. (2009). Creating People Advantage: How to Tackle the Major HR Challenges During the Crisis and Beyond. Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schyns, B., & Meindl, J. (2005). An overview of implicit leadership theories and their application in organization practice. In B. Schyns, & J. Meindl (Hrsg.), Implicit Leadership Theories – Essays and Explorations (S. 15–36). Greenwich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teas, K. (1931). Supervisory behavior, role stress, and the job satisfaction of industrial salespeople. Journal of Marketing Research, 20(1), 84–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, D. (1999). Strategic Human Resource Management. München.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wofford, J., & Liska, L. (1993). Path-goal theories of leadership: a meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 19(4), 857–876.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yukl, G. (2002). Leadership in Organizations. Englewood Cliffs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaccaro, S., & Dobbins, G. (1989). Contrasting group and organizational commitment: evidence for differences among multi-level attachments. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 10(3), 267–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ruth Stock-Homburg Prof. Dr. or Gülden Özbek-Potthoff Dr. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stock-Homburg, R., Özbek-Potthoff, G. (2013). Verhaltenstheoretische Perspektive der Mitarbeiterführung. In: Stock-Homburg, R. (eds) Handbuch Strategisches Personalmanagement. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-00431-6_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-00431-6_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-00430-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-00431-6

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics