Abstract
In recent years, nearly all of the job creation in the U.S. manufacturing sector can be attributed to growth in high-technology industries.1 The magnitude of this “technological renaissance” has not only spurred competition among states and metropolitan areas for high-technology employment, but also rekindled academic interest in the spatial dimensions of innovation process. However, amid this interest in high technology firms and centers, technological competition, and ensuing local development issues, very little information has been developed to date on the specialized labor resources (for both production and research and development) that generate the observed geographic patterns of interest.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Andersson, Å. E. and G. Haag, 1987, “Structural Change and Technological Development”, RICE Symposium, Karlstad.
Armington, C, 1986, “The Changing Geography of High-Technology Business”, in Rees, J., Technology, Regions, and Policy, Rowman and Littlefield, Totowa, 75–93.
Boyer, R. and D. Savageau, 1981, Places Rated Almanac, Rand McNally and Company, Chicago.
Bradbury, S.L. and E.J. Malecki, 1987, “Dual Career Couples and Geographic Mobility”, Southern Regional Science Association Meeting, Columbus.
Clark, G. 1981, “The Employment Relation and the Spatial Division of Labor: A Hypothesis”, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 412–424.
Doody, E.J. and H.B. Munzer, 1981, High Technology Employment in Massachusetts arid Selected States, Massachusetts Division of Employment Security, Boston.
Glasmeier, A.K., 1986, “High-tech Industries and the Regional Division of Labor”, Industrial Relations 25, 197–211.
Greenwood, M.J., 1975, “Research on Internal Migration in the United States: A Survey”, Journal of Economic Literature 13, 397–433.
Greenwood, M.J., 1985, “Human Migration: Theory, Models, and Empirical Studies”, Journal of Regional Science 25, 521–544.
Herzog, H.W. Jr. and A.M. Schlottmann, 1984, “Labor Force Mobility in the United States: Migration, Unemployment, and Remigration”, International Regional Science Review 9, 43–58.
Herzog, H.W. Jr. and A.M. Schlottmann, 1986, “The Metro Rating Game: What can be Learned from the Recent Migrants”, Growth and Change 17, 37–50.
Herzog, H.W. Jr., A.M. Schlottmann and D.L. Johnson, 1986, “High-Technology Jobs and Worker Mobility”, Journal of Regional Science 26,445–459.
Ladinsky, J., 1967, The Geographic Mobility of Professional and Technical Manpower, Journal of Human Resources 2, 474–494.
Markusen, A.R., 1986, “Defense Spending and the Geography of High-tech Industries”, in Rees, J. Technology, Regions, and Policy, Rowman and Littlefield, Totowa, 94–119.
McMillan, T.E. Jr., 1965, “Why Manufacturers Choose Plant Locations vs. Determinants of Plant Location”, Land Economics 41. 232–238.
McQuaid, R.W. and R.J. Langridge, 1984, “Defining High-Technology Industries”, British Section Meeting of the Regional Science Association, Canterbury.
Muth, R.F., 1971, “Migration: Chicken or Egg?”, Southern Economic Journal 37, 295–306.
National Science Foundation, 1980a, Employment Patterns of Academic Scientists and Engineers, 1973–78, G.P.O., Washington, D.C.
National Science Foundation, 1980b, Science and Engineering Personnel: A National Overview, G.P.O., Washington, D.C.
Premus, R., 1982, Location of High Technology Firms and Regional Economic Development, G.P.O., Washington, D.C.
Rees, J., 1979, “Technological Change and Regional Shifts in American Manufacturing”, The Professional Geographer 31,45–54
Rees, J. and H.A. Stafford, 1986, “Theories of Regional Growth and Industrial Location: Their Relevance for Understanding High-Technology Complexes”, in Rees, J., Technology, Regions, and Policy, Rowman and Littlefield, Totowa, 23–50.
Riche, R.W., D.E. Hecker and J.U. Burgan, 1983, “High Technology Today and Tomorrow: A Small Slice of the Employment Pie”, Monthly Labor Review 106, 50–58.
Ritchey, P.N., 1976, “Explanations of Migration”, Annual Review of Sociology 2, 363–404.
Schlotmann, A.M. and H.W. Herzog Jr., 1984, “Career and Geographic Mobility Interactions: Implications for the Age Selectivity of Migration”, Journal of Human Resources 19, 72–86.
Shaw, R.P., 1975, Migration Theory and Fact, Regional Science Research Institute, Philadelphia.
U.S. Bureau of the Census, 1983, Census of Population and Housing, 1980: Public-Use Microdata Samples Technical Documentation, G.P.O., Washington, D.C.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1989 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Herzog, H.W., Schlottmann, A.M. (1989). High-Technology Location and Worker Mobility in the U.S.. In: Andersson, Å.E., Batten, D.F., Karlsson, C. (eds) Knowledge and Industrial Organization. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-95597-6_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-95597-6_16
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-95599-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-95597-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive