Skip to main content

Trauma Care in Europe 1995

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine ((UICM,volume 22))

Abstract

There is a growing interest in the harmonisation of trauma care systems across Europe. This is not driven by any desire to achieve administrative consistency but rather by an interest in developing best practice by utilising the most effective parts of the many disparate systems now in use across the continent. In most medical specialties the delivery of care is dictated and limited by our knowledge of the disease processes involved, the costs of training and the purchase of equipment and facilities. Trauma care is different. The way that these various components are put together is of vital importance, but we have been slow to recognise this fact.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Tinguall C (1994) Car crash protection: the role of the European Union. European Transport Safety Council, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  2. OECD (1994) International road traffic and accident database. Federal Highway Research Institute, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  3. Office of Population Censuses and Surveys (1987) OPCS monitor: deaths from accidents and violence. 1984 DH4 87/1. OPCS, London

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mattox KL, Bickell W, Pepe PE, Burch J, Feliciano D (1989) Prospective MAST study in 911 patients. J Trauma 29:1104–1111

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kaweski SM, Sise MJ, Virgilio RW (1990) The effect of prehospital fluids on survival in trauma patients. J Trauma 30:1215–1218

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wall MJ, Mattox KL (1994) Successful roadside resuscitative thoracotomy: case report and literature review. J Trauma 36:131–134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cross F (1994) Transport of casualties. Injury 25:623–628

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Driscoll PA, Vincent CA (1992) Organising an efficient trauma team. Injury 23:107–110

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma (1993) Advanced trauma life support program for physicians. American College of Surgeons, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ali J, Adam R, Butler AK et al (1993) Trauma outcome improves following the advanced trauma life support programme in a developing country. J Trauma 34:890–899

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Yates DW (1992) Prognostic des traumatisés: tout ce la envaut-il la peine? Jeur 5:174–176

    Google Scholar 

  12. Delooz HH (1991) Organisation and implementation of emergency services in the treatment of major trauma. J Neurotrauma 8 [Suppl]:S1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Schmidt U, Frame SB, Nerlich ML et al (1992) On scene helicopter transport of patients with multiple injuries — comparison of a German and an American system. J Trauma 33:540–53

    Google Scholar 

  14. Boyd CR, Tolson MA, Copes WS (1987) Evaluating trauma care: the TRISS method. J Trauma 27:370–378

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Baker SP, O’Neill B, Hadden W, Leng WB (1974) The injury severity score, a method of describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency cases. J Trauma 14:187–196

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Champion HR, Sacco WJ, Copes WS, Gann DS, Genarelli TA, Flanagan ME (1989) A revision of the Trauma Score. J Trauma 29:623–629

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Champion HR, Copes WS, Sacco WJ et al (1990) The Major Trauma Outcome Study: establishing national norms for trauma care. J Trauma 30:1356–1365

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Yates DW, Woodford M, Hollis S (1992) Preliminary analysis of the care of injured patients in 33 British hospitals: first report of the United Kingdom Major Trauma Outcome Study. Br Med J 305:737–740

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Smith RF, Frateschi L, Sloan EP et al (1990) The impact of volume on outcome in seriously injured trauma patients: two years experience of the Chicago Trauma System. J Trauma 30:1066–1076

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Smith JS, Martin LF, Young WW, MacIoce DP (1990) Do trauma centres improve outcome over non-trauma centres: the evaluation of regional trauma care using discharge abstract data and patient management categories. J Trauma 30:1533–1538

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Schiowitz M, Stanovich H (1991) The impact of volume on outcome in seriously injured patients (letter). J Trauma 31:1176

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Waddell TK, Kalman PG, Goodman SJ, Girotti MJ (1991) Is outcome worse in small volume Canadian trauma centre? J Trauma 31:958–961

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Gentleman D (1994) Growth and repair after injury to the central nervous system. Injury 25:571–576

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. McManus K, McGuigan J (1994) Minimally invasive therapy in thoracic injury. Injury 25:609–614

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Fabian T, Croce MA, Stewart RM et al (1993) A prospective analysis of diagnostic laparoscopy in trauma. Ann Surg 517:557–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Nade S (1994) Stimulating osteogenesis. Injury 25:577–583

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Oakley PA (1994) Setting and living up to national standards for the care of the injured. Injury 25:595–604

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Yates DW, Galasko CSB (1993) Measuring outcome and quality control. In: Frostick SP, Radford PJ, Wallace WA (eds) Medical audit: rationale and practicalities. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 87–401

    Google Scholar 

  29. European Transport Safety Council (1994) Response to the Commission Communication to the Council for an action programme on road safety. COM (93) 246 final. Brussels. European Transport Safety Council

    Google Scholar 

  30. MacKay M (1994) Engineering in accidents: vehicle design and injuries. Injury 25:615–621

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Yates DW (1992) Education in emergency medicine. Baillieres Clin Anaesthesiol 6(1): 161–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Yates, D.W. (1995). Trauma Care in Europe 1995. In: Goris, R.J.A., Trentz, O. (eds) The Integrated Approach to Trauma Care. Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, vol 22. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-79272-4_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-79272-4_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-79274-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-79272-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics