Abstract
Recent quantifications of soil heterogeneity (e.g., Burgess and Webster 1980, Vieira et al. 1981, Yost et al. 1982, ten Berge et al. 1983, Wollum and Cassel 1984) have established the general validity of geostatistical principles for soil attributes. This means that soil and related properties (e.g., plant growth) are typically not independently distributed but characterized by autocorrelation. Besides the applicability of the use of geostatistical techniques such as kriging, this also has implications for other types of studies that are conducted in the landscape. This chapter addresses in general terms the nature of soil variability and its relation to soil-forming processes. In addition, it discusses sampling designs for various types of studies that are conducted in the landscape and are therefore affected by spatially dependent variance structures.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bartlett, M.S. 1938. The approximate recovery of information from field experiments with large blocks. J, Agric. Sci. 28:418–427.
Bartlett, M.S. 1978. Nearest neighbor models in the analysis of field experiments. J. Royal Statist. Soc. B 40:147–174.
Burgess, T.M., and R. Webster. 1980. Optimal interpolation and isarithmic mapping of soil properties I. The semivariogram and puntual kriging. J. Soil Sci. 31:315–331.
Cressie, N., and D. Hawkins. 1980. Robust estimation of the variogram, I. Math. Geology 12:115–125.
David, M. 1977.Geostatistieal Ore Reserve Estimation. Elsevier Publishing Co., New York.
Davidoff, B., J.W. Lewis, and H.M. Selim. 1986. A method for verifying the trend in studying spatial variability of soil temperature.Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 50:1122–1127.
Hamlett, Y.M., R. Horton, and N.A.C. Cressie. 1986. Resistant and exploratory techniques for use in semivariogram analyses. Soil Sci. Soe. Am. J. 50:868–875.
Isaaks, E.H., and R.M. Srivastava. 1989. Applied Geostatisties. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
Jenny, H. 1941. Factors of Soil Formation. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Joumel, A.G., and Ch. Huijbregts. 1978.Mining Geostatisties. Academic Press, London.
Kirk, H.J., F.L. Haynes, and R.J. Monroe. 1980. Application of trend analysis to horticultural field trials. J. Am. Hortie. Soe. 105:189–193.
Matheron, G. 1963. Principles of geostatisties. Eeon. Geol. 58:1246–1266.
McBratney, A.B., and R. Webster. 1981. Detection of ridge and furrow patterns by spectral analysis of crop yields. Intern. Stat. Review 49:45–52.
Mendez, I. 1970. Study of uniformity trials and six proposals to alternatives to blocking for the design and analysis of field experiments. Inst, of Statistics Mimeo Series 696. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.
Papadakis, J.S. 1937. Methode statistiquepour des experiences sur champ. Bull. Inst. Amel Plantes a Salonique 23.
Tamura, R.N., L.A. Nelson, and G.C. Naderman. 1988. An investigation on the validity and usefulness of trend analysis for field plot data.Agron. J. 80:712–718.
ten Berge, H.F.M., L. Stroosnijder, P.A. Burrough, A.K. Bregt, and M.J. de Heus. 1983. Spatial variability of physical properties influencing the temperature of the soil surface. Agric. Water Manag. 6:213–226.
van Es, H.M., C.L. van Es, and D.K. Cassel. 1989. Application of regionalized variable theory to large-plot field experiments. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 53:1178–1183.
van Es, H.M., and C.L. van Es. In press. The spatial nature of randomization and its effect on field experiments.Agron. J.
Vieira, S.R., D.R. Nielsen, and J.W. Biggar. 1981. Spatial variability of field-measured infiltration rate. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 45:1040–1048.
Wilkinson, G.N., S.R. Eckert, T.W. Hancock, and O. Mayo. 1983 Nearest neighbor (NN) analysis of field experiments. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 45:151–211.
Wollum, A.G., II, and D.K. Cassel. 1984. Spatial variability of Rhizobium japonicum in two North Carolina soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 48:1082–1086.
Yates, F. 1936. A new method arranging variety trials involving a large number of varieties. J. Agric. Sci. 26:424–455.
Yost, R.S., G. Uehara, and R.L. Fox. 1982. Geostatistical analysis of soil chemical properties of large land areas. I. Variograms. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. impressive. 46:1028–1032.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1993 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
van Es, H.M. (1993). The Spatial Nature of Soil Variability and Its Implications for Field Studies. In: Levin, S.A., Powell, T.M., Steele, J.W. (eds) Patch Dynamics. Lecture Notes in Biomathematics, vol 96. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-50155-5_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-50155-5_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-56525-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-50155-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive