Skip to main content

The Spatial Nature of Soil Variability and Its Implications for Field Studies

  • Conference paper
Patch Dynamics

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Biomathematics ((LNBM,volume 96))

  • 387 Accesses

Abstract

Recent quantifications of soil heterogeneity (e.g., Burgess and Webster 1980, Vieira et al. 1981, Yost et al. 1982, ten Berge et al. 1983, Wollum and Cassel 1984) have established the general validity of geostatistical principles for soil attributes. This means that soil and related properties (e.g., plant growth) are typically not independently distributed but characterized by autocorrelation. Besides the applicability of the use of geostatistical techniques such as kriging, this also has implications for other types of studies that are conducted in the landscape. This chapter addresses in general terms the nature of soil variability and its relation to soil-forming processes. In addition, it discusses sampling designs for various types of studies that are conducted in the landscape and are therefore affected by spatially dependent variance structures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bartlett, M.S. 1938. The approximate recovery of information from field experiments with large blocks. J, Agric. Sci. 28:418–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, M.S. 1978. Nearest neighbor models in the analysis of field experiments. J. Royal Statist. Soc. B 40:147–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, T.M., and R. Webster. 1980. Optimal interpolation and isarithmic mapping of soil properties I. The semivariogram and puntual kriging. J. Soil Sci. 31:315–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cressie, N., and D. Hawkins. 1980. Robust estimation of the variogram, I. Math. Geology 12:115–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David, M. 1977.Geostatistieal Ore Reserve Estimation. Elsevier Publishing Co., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidoff, B., J.W. Lewis, and H.M. Selim. 1986. A method for verifying the trend in studying spatial variability of soil temperature.Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 50:1122–1127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamlett, Y.M., R. Horton, and N.A.C. Cressie. 1986. Resistant and exploratory techniques for use in semivariogram analyses. Soil Sci. Soe. Am. J. 50:868–875.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isaaks, E.H., and R.M. Srivastava. 1989. Applied Geostatisties. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenny, H. 1941. Factors of Soil Formation. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joumel, A.G., and Ch. Huijbregts. 1978.Mining Geostatisties. Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, H.J., F.L. Haynes, and R.J. Monroe. 1980. Application of trend analysis to horticultural field trials. J. Am. Hortie. Soe. 105:189–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matheron, G. 1963. Principles of geostatisties. Eeon. Geol. 58:1246–1266.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McBratney, A.B., and R. Webster. 1981. Detection of ridge and furrow patterns by spectral analysis of crop yields. Intern. Stat. Review 49:45–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendez, I. 1970. Study of uniformity trials and six proposals to alternatives to blocking for the design and analysis of field experiments. Inst, of Statistics Mimeo Series 696. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papadakis, J.S. 1937. Methode statistiquepour des experiences sur champ. Bull. Inst. Amel Plantes a Salonique 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamura, R.N., L.A. Nelson, and G.C. Naderman. 1988. An investigation on the validity and usefulness of trend analysis for field plot data.Agron. J. 80:712–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ten Berge, H.F.M., L. Stroosnijder, P.A. Burrough, A.K. Bregt, and M.J. de Heus. 1983. Spatial variability of physical properties influencing the temperature of the soil surface. Agric. Water Manag. 6:213–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Es, H.M., C.L. van Es, and D.K. Cassel. 1989. Application of regionalized variable theory to large-plot field experiments. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 53:1178–1183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Es, H.M., and C.L. van Es. In press. The spatial nature of randomization and its effect on field experiments.Agron. J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vieira, S.R., D.R. Nielsen, and J.W. Biggar. 1981. Spatial variability of field-measured infiltration rate. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 45:1040–1048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, G.N., S.R. Eckert, T.W. Hancock, and O. Mayo. 1983 Nearest neighbor (NN) analysis of field experiments. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 45:151–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wollum, A.G., II, and D.K. Cassel. 1984. Spatial variability of Rhizobium japonicum in two North Carolina soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 48:1082–1086.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yates, F. 1936. A new method arranging variety trials involving a large number of varieties. J. Agric. Sci. 26:424–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yost, R.S., G. Uehara, and R.L. Fox. 1982. Geostatistical analysis of soil chemical properties of large land areas. I. Variograms. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. impressive. 46:1028–1032.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

van Es, H.M. (1993). The Spatial Nature of Soil Variability and Its Implications for Field Studies. In: Levin, S.A., Powell, T.M., Steele, J.W. (eds) Patch Dynamics. Lecture Notes in Biomathematics, vol 96. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-50155-5_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-50155-5_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-56525-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-50155-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics