Abstract
For most of the twentieth century, techniques for the biometric analysis of organic form fell into one of two incompatible styles. In the first, more indigenous style, a direct extension of techniques introduced into statistics by Galton, Pearson, and their heirs, conventional multivariate techniques were applied to a diverse roster of measures of single forms. The only algebraic structures involved were those of multivariate statistics, limited mainly to covariance matrices; no aspect of the geometric organization of the measures, or their biological rationale, was reflected in the method. Analyses of this mode led at best to path diagrams, not to sketches of typical organisms expressing the developmental or functional import of the coefficients computed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Blackith, R. Morphometrics. Pp. 225–249 in T. H. Waterman and H. J. Morowitz, eds., Theoretical and Mathematical Biology. New York: Blaisdell, 1965.
Blackith, R., and R. Reyment. Multivariate Morphometries. New York: Academic Press, 1971.
Bookstein, F. L. The Measurement of Biological Shape and Shape Change. Lecture Notes in Biomathematics, v. 24. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1978.
Bookstein, F. L. On the cephalometrics of skeletal change. American Journal of Orthodontics 82:177–198, 1982a.
Bookstein, F. L. Foundations of morphometries. Annual Reviews of Ecology and Systematics 13:451–470, 19826.
Bookstein, F. L. A statistical method for biological shape comparisons. Journal of Theoretical Biology 107:475–520, 1984a.
Bookstein, F. L. Tensor biometrics for changes in cranial shape. Annals of Human Biology 11:413–437, 19846.
Bookstein, F. L. Size and shape spaces for landmark data in two dimensions. Statistical Science 1:181–242, 1986.
Bookstein, F. L. Principal warps: thin-plate splines and the decomposition of deformations. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 11:567–585, 1989a.
Bookstein, F. L. “Size and shape”: a comment on semantics. Systematic Zoology 38:173–180, 1989b.
Bookstein, F. L. Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
Bookstein, F. L., B. Chernoff, R. Elder, J. Humphries, G. Smith, and R. Strauss. Morphometries in Evolutionary Biology. Philadelphia: Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 1985.
Bookstein, F. L., and W. D. K. Green. A feature space for edgels in images with landmarks. Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision 3: 231–261, 1993.
Boyd, E. Origins of the Study of Human Growth. University of Oregon Health Sciences Center, 1980.
Burnaby, T. P. Growth-invariant discriminant functions and generalized distances. Biometrics 22:96–110, 1966.
Corruccini, R. S. Analytical techniques for Cartesian coordinate data with reference to the relationships between Hylobates and Symphalangus. Systematic Zoology 30:32–40, 1981.
Duncan, O. D. Notes on Social Measurement: Historical and Critical. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1984.
Dürer, A. Vier Bücher von Menschlicher Proportion. Somewhere in Northern Europe, 1528.
Goodall, C. R. The statistical analysis of growth in two dimensions. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Statistics, Harvard University, 1983.
Goodall, C. R. Procrustes methods in the statistical analysis of shape. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B53:285–339, 1991.
Goodall, C. R., and K. Mardia. A geometric derivation of the shape density. Advances in Applied Probability 23:496–514, 1991.
Hopkins, J. W. Some considerations in multivariate allometry. Biometrics 22:747–760, 1966.
Hotelling, H. Relations between two sets of variables. Biometrika 28:321–377, 1936.
Humphries, J. M., F. Bookstein, B. Chernoff, G. Smith, R. Elder, and S. Poss. Multivariate discrimination by shape in relation to size. Systematic Zoology 30:291–308, 1981.
Huxley, J. Principles of Relative Growth. London: Methuen, 1932.
Jolicoeur, P. The multivariate generalization of the allometry equation. Biometrics 19:497–499, 1963.
Kendall, D. G. Shape-manifolds, procrustean metrics, and complex projective spaces. Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society 16:81–121, 1984.
Kuhn, T. S. The function of measurement in modern physical science. Pp. 31–63 in H. Woolf, ed., Quantification. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1959.
Latour, B. Science in Action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1987.
Lewis, J. L., W. Lew, and J. Zimmerman. A nonhomogeneous anthropometric scaling method based on finite element principles. Journal of Biomechanics 13:815–824, 1980.
Lohmann, G. P. Eigenshape analysis of microfossils: a general morphometric procedure for describing changes in shape. Mathematical Geology 15:659–672, 1983.
Mackenzie, D. A. Statistics in Britain, 1865–1930: The Social Construction of Scientific Knowledge. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1981.
Mardia, K. V., and I. Dryden. The statistical analysis of shape data. Biometrika 76:271–282, 1989.
Mosimann, J. E. Size allometry: size and shape variables with characterizations of the log-normal and generalized gamma distributions. Journal of the American Statistical Association 65:930–945, 1970.
Oxnard, C. E. Form and Pattern in Human Evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1973.
Oxnard, C. E. One biologist’s view of morphometrics. Annual Reviews of Ecology and Systematics 9:219–241, 1978.
Reyment, R. A. Multivariate Paleobiology. Oxford: Pergamon, 1991.
Richards, O. W., and A. C. Kavanagh. The analysis of relative growth-gradients and changing form of growing organisms: illustrated by the tobacco leaf. American Naturalist 77:385–399, 1943.
Rohlf, F. J. The relationships among eigenshape analysis, Fourier analysis, and the analysis of coordinates. Mathematical Geology 18:845–854, 1986.
Rohlf, F. J. Relative warp analysis and an example of its application to mosquito wings. Pp. 131–159 in L. F. Marcus, E. Bello, and A. G. Valdecasas, eds., Contributions to Morphometrics., Madrid: Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, 1993.
Rohlf, F. J., and F. Bookstein, eds. Proceedings of the Michigan Morphometries Workshop. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Museums, 1990.
Sampson, P. D., F. Bookstein, S. Lewis, C. Hurley, and P. Guttorp. Computation and application of deformations for landmark data in morphometries and environmetrics. Pp. 534–541 in E. Keramidas, ed., Computing Science and Statistics: Proceedings of the 23rd Symposium on the Interface. Fairfax Station, VA: Interface Foundation of North America, Inc., 1991.
Sneath, P. H. A., and R. R. Sokal. Principles of Numerical Taxonomy. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman, 1963.
Sneath, P. H. A. Trend-surface analysis of transformation grids. Journal of Zoology 151:65–122, 1967.
Thompson, D. A. W. On Growth and Form. London: Macmillan, 1917.
Wright, S. Evolution and the Genetics of Populations. Vol. 1: Genetic and Biometrie Foundations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1968.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1994 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Bookstein, F.L. (1994). The Morphometric Synthesis: A Brief Intellectual History. In: Levin, S.A. (eds) Frontiers in Mathematical Biology. Lecture Notes in Biomathematics, vol 100. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-50124-1_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-50124-1_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-50126-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-50124-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive