Skip to main content

Extracting Categorical Topics from Tweets Using Topic Model

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 8281))

Abstract

Over the past few years, microblogging websites, such as Twitter, are growing increasingly popular. Different with traditional medias, tweets are structured data and with a lot of noisy words. Topic modeling algorithms for traditional medias have been studied well, but our understanding of Twitter still remains limited and few algorithms are specially designed to mine Twitter data according to its own characteristics. Previous studies usually employ only one type of topic to analyze hot topics of the Twitter community and are greatly affected by the large amount of noisy words in tweets. We have observed that, in the Twitter community, users tend to discuss two types of topics actually. One mainly focuses on their personal lives and the other on hot issues of the society. These two types of topics usually yield different distributions. In this paper, we introduce the Categorical Topic Model. This model incorporates the features of Twitter data to divide topics into two types in semantic and introduce a word distribution for background words to filter out noisy words. Our model is able to discover different types of topics efficiently, indicate which topics are interested by an user and find hot issues of the Twitter community. Employing the Gibbs sampling, we compare our model with Latent Dirichlet Allocation and Author Topic Model on the TREC2011 data set and examples of discovered public topics and personal topics are also discussed in our paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Xu, R., Donald, Wunsch, o.: Survey of clustering algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 16(3), 645–678 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chowdhury, G.: Introduction to modern information retrieval. Facet publishing (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Deerwester, S., Dumais, S.T., Furnas, G.W., Landauer, T.K., Harshman, R.: Indexing by latent semantic analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 41(6), 391–407 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hofmann, T.: Probabilistic latent semantic indexing. In: Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 50–57. ACM (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Blei, D.M., Ng, A.Y., Jordan, M.I.: Latent dirichlet allocation. The Journal of Machine Learning Research 3, 993–1022 (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Naaman, M., Boase, J., Lai, C.H.: Is it really about me?: message content in social awareness streams. In: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 189–192. ACM (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ritter, A., Cherry, C., Dolan, B.: Unsupervised modeling of twitter conversations (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Krishnamurthy, B., Gill, P., Arlitt, M.: A few chirps about twitter. In: Proceedings of the First Workshop on Online Social Networks, pp. 19–24. ACM (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ramage, D., Hall, D., Nallapati, R., Manning, C.D.: Labeled lda: A supervised topic model for credit attribution in multi-labeled corpora. In: Proceedings of the 2009 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, vol. 1, pp. 248–256. Association for Computational Linguistics (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ramage, D., Dumais, S., Liebling, D.: Characterizing microblogs with topic models. In: International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, vol. 5, pp. 130–137 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zhao, W.X., Jiang, J., Weng, J., He, J., Lim, E.-P., Yan, H., Li, X.: Comparing twitter and traditional media using topic models. In: Clough, P., Foley, C., Gurrin, C., Jones, G.J.F., Kraaij, W., Lee, H., Mudoch, V. (eds.) ECIR 2011. LNCS, vol. 6611, pp. 338–349. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Heinrich, G.: Parameter estimation for text analysis (2005), http://www.arbylon.net/publications/text-est.pdf

  13. Griffiths, T., Steyvers, M.: Probabilistic topic models. In: Latent Semantic Analysis: A Road to Meaning (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zheng, L., Han, K. (2013). Extracting Categorical Topics from Tweets Using Topic Model. In: Banchs, R.E., Silvestri, F., Liu, TY., Zhang, M., Gao, S., Lang, J. (eds) Information Retrieval Technology. AIRS 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8281. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45068-6_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45068-6_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-45067-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-45068-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics