Skip to main content

Valuation Compressions in VCG-Based Combinatorial Auctions

  • Conference paper
Book cover Web and Internet Economics (WINE 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 8289))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The focus of classic mechanism design has been on truthful direct-revelation mechanisms. In the context of combinatorial auctions the truthful direct-revelation mechanism that maximizes social welfare is the VCG mechanism. For many valuation spaces computing the allocation and payments of the VCG mechanism, however, is a computationally hard problem. We thus study the performance of the VCG mechanism when bidders are forced to choose bids from a subspace of the valuation space for which the VCG outcome can be computed efficiently. We prove improved upper bounds on the welfare loss for restrictions to additive bids and upper and lower bounds for restrictions to non-additive bids. These bounds show that the welfare loss increases in expressiveness. All our bounds apply to equilibrium concepts that can be computed in polynomial time as well as to learning outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bhawalkar, K., Roughgarden, T.: Welfare guarantees for combinatorial auctions with item bidding. In: Proc. of 22nd SODA, pp. 700–709 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cesa-Bianchi, N., Mansour, Y., Stoltz, G.: Improved second-order bounds for prediction with expert advice. Machine Learning 66(2-3), 321–352 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Christodoulou, G., Kovács, A., Schapira, M.: Bayesian combinatorial auctions. In: Aceto, L., Damgård, I., Goldberg, L.A., Halldórsson, M.M., Ingólfsdóttir, A., Walukiewicz, I. (eds.) ICALP 2008, Part I. LNCS, vol. 5125, pp. 820–832. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Clarke, E.H.: Multipart pricing of public goods. Public Choice 11, 17–33 (1971)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dütting, P., Fischer, F., Parkes, D.C.: Simplicity-expressiveness tradeoffs in mechanism design. In: Proc. of 12th EC, pp. 341–350 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Feldman, M., Fu, H., Gravin, N., Lucier, B.: Simultaneous auctions are (almost) efficient. In: Proc. of 45th STOC, pp. 201–210 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Foster, D., Vohra, R.: Calibrated learning and correlated equilibrium. Games and Economic Behavior 21, 40–55 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Fredman, M.L., Tarjan, R.E.: Fibonacci heaps and their uses in improved network optimization algorithms. Journal of the ACM 34(3), 596–615 (1987)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Garey, M.R., Johnson, D.S.: Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness. W. H. Freeman and Company, New York (1979)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Groves, T.: Incentives in teams. Econometrica 41, 617–631 (1973)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Hart, S., Mas-Colell, A.: A simple adaptive procedure leading to correlated equilibrium. Econometrica 68, 1127–1150 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Hassidim, A., Kaplan, H., Mansour, Y., Nisan, N.: Non-price equilibria in markets of discrete goods. In: Proc. of 12th EC, pp. 295–296 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jiang, A.X., Leyton-Brown, K.: Polynomial-time computation of exact correlated equilibrium in compact games. In: Proc. of 12th EC, pp. 119–126 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  14. de Keijzer, B., Markakis, E., Schäfer, G., Telelis, O.: On the inefficiency of standard multi-unit auctions, pp. 1–16 (2013), http://arxiv.org/abs/1303.1646

  15. Kelso, A.S., Crawford, V.: Job matching, coalition formation, and gross substitutes. Econometrica 50, 1483–1504 (1982)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Lehmann, B., Lehmann, D., Nisan, N.: Combinatorial auctions with decreasing marginal utilities. Games and Economic Behavior 55, 270–296 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Littlestone, N., Warmuth, M.K.: The weighted majority algorithm. Information and Computation 108(2), 212–261 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Markakis, E., Telelis, O.: Uniform price auctions: Equilibria and efficiency. In: Serna, M. (ed.) SAGT 2012. LNCS, vol. 7615, pp. 227–238. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Milgrom, P.: Simplified mechanisms with an application to sponsored-search auctions. Games and Economic Behavior 70, 62–70 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Murota, K.: Valuated matroid intersection II: Algorithm. SIAM Journal of Discrete Mathematics 9, 562–576 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Murota, K.: Matrices and Matroids for Systems Analysis. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Murota, K., Tamura, A.: Applications of m-convex submodular flow problem to mathematical economics. In: Eades, P., Takaoka, T. (eds.) ISAAC 2001. LNCS, vol. 2223, pp. 14–25. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Nisan, N., Roughgarden, T., Tardos, E., Vazirani, V.: Algorithmic Game Theory. Cambridge University Press, New York (2007)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Papadimitriou, C., Roughgarden, T.: Computing correlated equilibria in multi-player games. Journal of the ACM 55, 14 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Roughgarden, T.: Intrinsic robustness of the price of anarchy. In: Proc. of 41st STOC, pp. 513–522 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Roughgarden, T.: The price of anarchy in games of incomplete information. In: Proc. of 13th EC, pp. 862–879 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Syrgkanis, V., Tardos, É.: Composable and efficient mechanisms. In: Proc. of 45th STOC, pp. 211–220 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Tarjan, R.E.: Data structures and network algorithms. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia (1983)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  29. Vickrey, W.: Counterspeculation, auctions, and competitive sealed tenders. J. of Finance 16(1), 8–37 (1961)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. de Vries, S., Bikhchandani, S., Schummer, J., Vohra, R.V.: Linear programming and Vickrey auctions. In: Dietrich, B., Vohra, R.V. (eds.) Mathematics of the Internet: E-Auctions and Markets, IMA Volumes in Mathematics and its Applications, pp. 75–116. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dütting, P., Henzinger, M., Starnberger, M. (2013). Valuation Compressions in VCG-Based Combinatorial Auctions. In: Chen, Y., Immorlica, N. (eds) Web and Internet Economics. WINE 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8289. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45046-4_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45046-4_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-45045-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-45046-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics