Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 7070))

Abstract

The human mind is known to be sensitive to complexity. For instance, the visual system reconstructs hidden parts of objects following a principle of maximum simplicity. We suggest here that higher cognitive processes, such as the selection of relevant situations, are sensitive to variations of complexity. Situations are relevant to human beings when they appear simpler to describe than to generate. This definition offers a predictive (i.e. falsifiable) model for the selection of situations worth reporting (interestingness) and for what individuals consider an appropriate move in conversation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Solomonoff, R.J.: A Formal Theory of Inductive Inference. Information and Control 7(1), 1–22 (1964), http://world.std.com/~rjs/1964pt1.pdf

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Chater, N.: The search for simplicity: A fundamental cognitive principle? The Quaterly J. of Exp. Psychol. 52 (A), 273–302 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chater, N., Vitányi, P.: Simplicity: a unifying principle in cognitive science? Trends in cogn. Sc. 7(1), 19–22 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Feldman, J.: How surprising is a simple pattern? Quantifying ‘Eureka!’. Cognition 93, 199–224 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dessalles, J.-L.: Coincidences and the encounter problem: A formal account. In: Love, B.C., McRae, K., Sloutsky, V.M. (eds.) Pr. of the 30th Annual Conf. of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 2134–2139. Cognitive Science Society, Austin (2008), http://www.dessalles.fr/papiers/pap.conv/Dessalles_08020201.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kahneman, D., Tversky, A.: Subjective probability: A judgement of representativeness. Cogn. Psychol. 3, 430–454 (1972)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dessalles, J.-L. (2008), La pertinence et ses origines cognitives - Nouvelles théories. Hermes-Science Publications, Paris, http://pertinence.dessalles.fr

  8. Li, M., Vitányi, P.: An introduction to Kolmogorov complexity and its applications, 3rd edn. Springer, New York (1997)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Schmidhuber, J.: Simple Algorithmic Theory of Subjective Beauty, Novelty, Surprise, Interestingness, Attention, Curiosity, Creativity, Art, Science, Music, Jokes. Journal of SICE 48(1), 21–32 (2009), http://www.idsia.ch/~juergen/sice2009.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dowe, D.L.: Foreword re C. S. Wallace. The Computer Journal 51(5), 523–560 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dowe, D.L.: MML, hybrid Bayesian network graphical models, statistical consistency, invariance and uniqueness. In: Bandyopadhyay, P.S., Forster, M.R. (eds.) Handbook of the Philosophy of Science. Philosophy of Statistics, vol. 7, pp. 901–982. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. http://www.simplicitytheory.org

  13. Polanyi, L.: So What’s the point? Semiotica 25(3), 207–241 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sperber, D., Wilson, D.: Relevance: Communication and cognition. Blackwell, ed., Oxford (1986,1995)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Grice, H.P.: Logic and conversation. In: Cole, P., Morgan, J.L. (eds.) Syntax and Semantics. Speech acts, vol. III, pp. 41–58. Academic Press, New York (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schmidhuber, J.: What’s interesting? Lugano, CH: Technical Report IDSIA-35-97 (1997), ftp://ftp.idsia.ch/pub/juergen/interest.ps.gz

  17. Norrick, N.R.: Conversational narrative: storytelling in everyday talk. J. Benjamins Publ. Comp., Amsterdam (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kahneman, D., Miller, D.T.: Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychol. Rev. 93(2), 136–153 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chaitin, G.J.: On the intelligibility of the universe and the notions of simplicity, complexity and irreducibility. In: Hogrebe, Bromand (eds.) Grenzen und Grenzüberschreitungen, vol. XIX, pp. 517–534. Akademie Verlag, Berlin (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dessalles, JL. (2013). Algorithmic Simplicity and Relevance. In: Dowe, D.L. (eds) Algorithmic Probability and Friends. Bayesian Prediction and Artificial Intelligence. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7070. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-44958-1_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-44958-1_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-44957-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-44958-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics