Skip to main content

A Semantic Analysis of Shared References

  • Conference paper
Book cover Conceptual Modeling (ER 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 8217))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Models, according to common understanding, facilitate to make and share references. A reference is a deictic activity whose point of origin differs from its target. The activity of modeling rests on taking a reference’s point of origin as a substitute for its target. In this paper I discuss two aspects of modeling, namely abstraction and direction-of-fit. I am going to show that representation, rather than abstraction, is key to modeling and that the direction-of-fit is not inherent to a model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Booch, G., Rumbaugh, J., Jacobson, I.: The Unified Modeling Language user guide. Addison Wesley (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Carnap, R.: Der logische Aufbau der Welt. Felix Meiner Verlag (1928)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chen, P.: The Entity-Relationship model – toward a unified view of data. ACM ToDS 1(1) (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Faroult, S., Robson, P.: The art of SQL. O’Reilly (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fleck, L.: Entstehung und Entwicklung einer wissenschaftlichen Tatsache. Einführung in die Lehre vom Denkstil und Denkkollektiv. Schwabe und Co., Verlagsbuchhandlung, Basel (1935)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Frigg, R., Hartmann, S.: Models in science. In: Zalta, E. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (fall 2012), http://plato.stanford.edu

  7. Harel, D.: On visual formalisms. Communications of the ACM 31(5) (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Harel, D., Rumpe, B.: Meaningful modeling: what’s the semantics of “semantics”? IEEE Computer 37(10) (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kamlah, W., Lorenzen, P.: Logische Propädeutik: eine Vorschule des vernünftigen Redens, 2nd edn. Bibliographisches Institut. (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kaschek, R.: A little theory of abstraction. In: Proceedings of Modellierung 2004, GI Edition. Lecture Notes in Informatics, p. 45. Bonn (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kaschek, R.: Modeling ontology use for information systems. In: Althoff, K.-D., Dengel, A.R., Bergmann, R., Nick, M., Roth-Berghofer, T.R. (eds.) WM 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3782, pp. 609–622. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Kralemann, B., Lattmann, C.: Models as icons: modeling models in the semiotic framework of Peirce’s theory of signs. Synthese (September 2012), doi:10.1007/s11229-012-0176-x

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lockemann, P., Mayr, H.: Rechnergestützte Informations systeme. Springer (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Marx, K.: Theses on Feuerbach, vol. 1845 (2012), http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/newlineworks/1845/theses/theses.htm (accessed on December 3)

  15. Morris, C.: Signs, language and behavior. Prentice-Hall, Inc. (1946)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Muller, P.-A., Fondement, F., Baudry, B., Combemale, B.: Modeling modeling. Softw. Syst. Model 11 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ramakrishnan, R., Gehrke, J.: Database management systems, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hil (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Seidewitz, E.: What models mean. IEEE Software 20(5) (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Stachowiak, H.: Allgemeine Modelltheorie. Springer (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Teorey, T., Lightstone, S., Nadeau., T., Jagadish, H.V.: Database modeling and design: logical design, 5th edn. Morgan Kaufmann (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Thalheim, B.: Syntax, semantics and pragmatics of conceptual modeling. In: Bouma, G., Ittoo, A., Métais, E., Wortmann, H. (eds.) NLDB 2012. LNCS, vol. 7337, pp. 1–10. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Thalheim, B.: The definition of the (conceptual) model. In: Proceedings of EJC 2013. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wand, Y., Weber, R.: Research commentary: information systems and conceptual modeling – a research agenda. Information Systems Research 13(4) (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wieringa, R.: Algebraic foundations for dynamic conceptual models. PhD thesis, Free University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam (May 1990)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kaschek, R. (2013). A Semantic Analysis of Shared References. In: Ng, W., Storey, V.C., Trujillo, J.C. (eds) Conceptual Modeling. ER 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8217. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41924-9_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41924-9_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-41923-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-41924-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics