Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Springer-Lehrbuch ((SLB))

Zusammenfassung

Dieses Kapitel vermittelt folgende Lernziele: Wissen, wie Population und Stichprobe definiert sind. Das Konzept der Repräsentativität erläutern und problematisieren können. Die wichtigsten qualitativen Stichprobenarten kennen. Die wichtigsten quantitativen Stichprobenarten kennen. Die Vor- und Nachteile probabilistischer und nicht-probabilistischer Stichproben abwägen können.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Baker, R., Brick, J. M., Bates, N. A., Battaglia, M., Couper, M. P., Dever, J. A., et al. (2013). Report of the AAPOR Task Force on non-probability sampling: American Association for Public Opinion Research AAPOR. Retrieved October 4, 2013, from http://www.aapor.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Reports1&Template=/CM/ContentDisplay.cfm&ContentID=5963.

  • Behnke, J. (2005). Lassen sich Signifikanztests auf Vollerhebungen anwenden? Einige essayistische Anmerkungen. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 46(1), 2–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berland, M. A. & Thomas, K. R. (1991). Psychosocial issues following severe head injury in adolescence: Individual and family perceptions. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 35(1), 5–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billeter, E. P. (1970). Grundlagen der repräsentativen Statistik. Wien: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjorkman, M. & Malterud, K. (2009). Lesbian women’s experiences with health care: A qualitative study. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, 27(4), 238–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bortz, J., Lienert, G. A., & Boehnke, K. (2008). Verteilungsfreie Methoden in der Biostatistik (3rd ed.). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bortz, J. & Schuster, C. (2010). Statistik für Human- und Sozialwissenschaftler (7th. ed.). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broscheid, A. & Geschwend, T. (2005). Zur statistischen Analyse von Vollerhebungen. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 46(1), 16–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chersich, M. F., Luchters, S. M. F., Malonza, I. M., Mwarogo, P., King’ola, N., & Temmerman, M. (2007). Heavy episodic drinking among Kenyan female sex workers is associated with unsafe sex, sexual violence and sexually transmitted infections. International Journal of STD and AIDS, 18(11), 764–769.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christopher, F. S., Pflieger, J. C., Canary, D. J., Guerrero, L. K., & Holtzworth-Munroe, A. (2008). Targeted neighborhood sampling: A new approach for recruiting abusive couples. Journal of Family Violence, 23(2), 89–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diekmann, A. (2005). Empirische Sozialforschung: Grundlagen, Methoden, Anwendungen. Reinbeck: Rowohlt.

    Google Scholar 

  • DMS Research. (2008). A Deep Dive into the River – Comparing Multiple Streams of River Respondents. Retrieved September 9, 2013, from http://www.usamp.com/objects/pdf/pr/DMS/DMS_River_Deep_Dive_White_Paper.pdf.

  • Drake, F. (2011). Protesting mobile phone masts: Risk, neoliberalism, and governmentality. Science, Technology and Human Values, 36(4), 522–548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgington, E. & Onghena, P. (2007). Randomization Tests (4th ed.). Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eid, M., Gollwitzer, M., & Schmitt, M. (2013). Statistik und Forschungsmethoden (3rd ed.). Weinheim: Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flick, U. (1996). Psychologie des technisierten Alltags – Soziale Konstruktion und Repräsentation technischen Wandels in verschiedenen kulturellen Kontexten. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flick, U. (2010). Qualitative Sozialforschung. Eine Einführung (3rd ed.). Reinbeck: Rowohlt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, D., Pisani, R., & Purves, R. (1978). Statisics. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G. & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G. & Strauss, A. L. (1999). The discovery of grounded theory (8th ed.). Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, L. A. (1961). Snowballsampling. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 32(1), 148–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goscinny, R. & Sempé, J.-J. (1976). Der kleine Nick und die Mädchen. Zürich: Diogenes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hager, W. (2013). The statistical theories of Fisher and of Neyman and Pearson: A methodological perspective. Theory and Psychology, 23(2), 251–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckathorn, D. D. (1997). Respondent-driven sampling: A new approach to the study of hidden populations. Social Problems, 44(2), 174–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higginbottom, G. M. A. (2004). Sampling issues in qualitative research. Nurse Researcher, 12(1), 7–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jandura, G., Jandura, O., & Kuhlmann, C. (2005). Stichprobenziehung in der Inhaltsanalyse. Gegen den Mythos der künstlichen Woche. In V. Gehrau, B. Fretwurst, B. Krause & G. Daschmann (Hrsg.), Auswahlverfahren in der Kommunikationswissenschaft (S. 71–116). Köln: Halem.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, A. (2011). Resilience among japanese atomic bomb survivors. International Nursing Review, 58(1), 54–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozak, M. (2005). Finite and infinite populations in biological statistics: Should we distinguish them? The Journal of American Science 4(1), 59–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lam, W. K. K., Cance, J. D., Eke, A. N., Fishbein, D. H., Hawkins, S. R., & Williams, J. C. (2007). Children of African-American mothers who use crack cocaine: Parenting influences on youth substance use. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 32(8), 877–887.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legault, A. & Ducharme, F. (2009). Advocating for a parnet with dementia in a long-term care facility: The process experienced by daughters. Journal of Family Nursing, 15(2), 198–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsmeier, G. (1999). Standard oder Fehler? Einige Eigenschaften von Schätzungsverfahren bei komplexen Stichprobenplänen und aktuelle Lösungsansätze. ZA-Information, 44, 96–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, M. N. (1996). Sampling for qualitative research. Family Practice, 13(6), 522–525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, M. (2010). Sample size and saturation in PhD studies using qualitative interviews. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 11(3). Retrieved October 4, 2013, from http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1428.

  • Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, J. A., Schacht Reisinger, H., Schwartz, R. P., Mitchell, S. G., Kelly, S. M., Brown, B. S., et al. (2008). Targeted sampling in drug abuse research: A review and case study. Field Methods, 20(2), 155–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Safman, R. M. & Sobal, J. (2004). Qualitative sample extensiveness in health education research. Health Education and Behavior, 31(1), 9–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheuch, E. K. (1974) Auswahlverfahren in der Sozialforschung. Handbuch der empirischen Sozialforschung, Bd. 3a Grundlegende Methoden und Techniken. Stuttgart: Enke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnell, R., Hill, P. B., & Esser, E. (2008). Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung. München: Oldenbourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Rand Corporation. (1955). A million random digits with 100 000 normal deviates. Glencoe: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turgeman-Goldschmidt, O. (2005). Hackers’ Accounts: Hacking as a Social Entertainment. Social Science Computer Review, 23(1), 8–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watters, J. K. & Biernacki, P. (1989). Targeted sampling: Options for the study of hidden populations. Social Problems, 36(4), 416–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wejnert, C. & Heckathorn, D. D. (2008). Web-based network sampling: Efficiency and efficacy of respondent-driven sampling for online research. Sociological Methods and Research, 37(1), 105–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westermann, R. (2000). Wissenschaftstheorie und Experimentalmethodik. Ein Lehrbuch zur psychologischen Methodenlehre. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winterich, J. A., Quandt, S. A., Grzywacz, J. G., Clark, P. E., Miller, D. P., Acuña, J., et al. (2009). Masculinity and the body: How African American and white men experience cancer screening exams involving the rectum. American Journal of Men’s Health, 3(4), 300–309.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Döring, N., Bortz, J. (2016). Stichprobenziehung. In: Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation in den Sozial- und Humanwissenschaften. Springer-Lehrbuch. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41089-5_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41089-5_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-41088-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-41089-5

  • eBook Packages: Psychology (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics