Abstract
Ultrasound acquisition is a challenging task that requires simultaneous adjustment of several acquisition parameters (the depth, the focus, the frequency and its operation mode). If the acquisition parameters are not properly chosen, the resulting image will have a poor quality and will degrade the patient diagnosis and treatment workflow. Several hardware-based systems for autotuning the acquisition parameters have been previously proposed, but these solutions were largely abandoned because they failed to properly account for tissue inhomogeneity and other patient-specific characteristics. Consequently, in routine practice the clinician either uses population-based parameter presets or manually adjusts the acquisition parameters for each patient during the scan. In this paper, we revisit the problem of autotuning the acquisition parameters by taking a completely novel approach and producing a solution based on image analytics. Our solution is inspired by the autofocus capability of conventional digital cameras, but is significantly more challenging because the number of acquisition parameters is large and the determination of “good quality” images is more difficult to assess. Surprisingly, we show that the set of acquisition parameters which produce images that are favored by clinicians comprise a 1D manifold, allowing for a real-time optimization to maximize image quality. We demonstrate our method for acquisition parameter autotuning on several live patients, showing that our system can start with a poor initial set of parameters and automatically optimize the parameters to produce high quality images.
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Acquisition Parameter
- Good Quality Image
- Image Quality Assessment
- Medical Ultrasound Imaging
- Ultrasound Acquisition
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
Smith, S., Goldberg, R.: Multilayer piezoelectric ceramics for two-dimensional transducers. IEEE Trans. on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control (1994)
Mooney, M., Wilson, M.: Linear array transducers with improved image quality for vascular ultrasonic imaging. Hewlett-Packard Journal (1994)
Dhanaliwala, A.H., Hossack, J., Mauldin, W.: Assessing and improving acoustic radiation force image quality using a 1.5-d transducer design. IEEE Trans. Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control (2012)
Zhu, J.: A holey-structured metamaterial for acoustic deep-subwavelength imaging. Nature Physics (2010)
Asl, B.M.: Minimum variance beamforming combined with adaptive coherence weighting applied to medical ultrasound imaging. IEEE Trans. Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control (2009)
Xu, M., Chen, Y., Ding, M., Ming, Y.: Adaptive minimum variance beamforming combined with phase coherence imaging for ultrasound imaging. SPIE Medical Imaging (2012)
Nilsen, C.I., Hafizovic, I.: Beamspace adaptive beamforming for ultrasound imaging. IEEE Trans. Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control (2009)
Su, Y., Wang, H., Wang, Y., et al.: Speckle reduction approach for breast ultrasound image and its application to breast cancer diagnosis. European J. of Radiology (2010)
Serre, T., Wolf, L., Bileschi, S., Riesenhuber, M., Poggio, T.: Robust object recognition with cortex-like mechanisms. IEEE PAMI 29, 411–426 (2007)
Mutch, J., Lowe, D.G.: Object class recognition and localization using sparse features with limited receptive fields. IJCV 80(1), 45–57 (2008)
Coifman, R., Lafon, S.: Diffusion maps. Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis 21, 5–30 (2006)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
El-Zehiry, N., Yan, M., Good, S., Fang, T., Zhou, S.K., Grady, L. (2013). Learning the Manifold of Quality Ultrasound Acquisition. In: Mori, K., Sakuma, I., Sato, Y., Barillot, C., Navab, N. (eds) Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2013. MICCAI 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8149. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40811-3_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40811-3_16
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-40810-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-40811-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)