Skip to main content

Disorders of the Vitreoretinal Interface

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Microperimetry and Multimodal Retinal Imaging

Abstract

Macular diseases involving the vitreoretinal interface are caused by abnormal cell migration and proliferation into or behind the posterior vitreous cortex or by vitreous traction onto the macula.

Microperimetry has added new and extensive information in the study of retinal function in many macular diseases secondary to alteration of the vitreoretinal interface including epiretinal membranes, macular pseudoholes, and lamellar and full-thickness macular hole.

In epiretinal membranes microperimetry shows a preservation of macular sensitivity in the initial stages, whereas it detects a significant reduction of macular sensitivity in the most advanced ones. In macular pseudoholes or lamellar macular holes normal or light reduction of sensitivity is documented. Full-thickness macular hole always corresponds to an absolute scotoma surrounded by a perilesional ring of relative scotoma, and retinal fixation moves to a retinal area immediately adjacent to the scotoma (preferred retinal locus).

Surgery is sometimes a major therapeutic indication and the functional evaluation by microperimetry is mandatory to evaluate the clinical course of vitreomacular interface diseases, in a diagnostic work-up which includes visual acuity quantification and morphological evaluation by OCT. Better baseline retinal sensitivity is a positive prognostic factor in eyes undergoing surgery and presenting the same preoperative visual acuity. Visual acuity assessment without the information supplied by microperimetry may underestimate functional benefit of surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Sebag J (1992) Anatomy and pathology of the vitreo-retinal interface. Eye (Lond) 6:541–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wise GN (1975) Clinical features of idiopathic preretinal macular fibrosis. Schoenberg Lecture. Am J Ophthalmol 79:349–357

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kenyon KR, Michels RG (1977) Ultrastructure of epiretinal membrane removed by pars plana vitreoretinal surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 83:815–823

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Clarkson SG, Green WR, Massof D (1977) A histopathologic review of 168 cases of preretinal membrane. Am J Ophthalmol 84:1–17

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fish RH, Anand R, Izbrand DJ (1992) Macular pseudoholes: clinical features and accuracy of diagnosis. Ophthalmology 99:1665–1670

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Varano M, Billi B, Scassa C et al (1997) Scanning laser ophthalmoscopy in the early diagnosis of vitreoretinal interface syndrome. Retina 17:300–305

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Martinez J, Smiddy WE, Kim J et al (1994) Differentiating macular holes from macular pseudoholes. Am J Ophthalmol 117:762–767

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Varano M, Scassa C (1998) Scanning laser ophthalmoscope microperimetry. Semin Ophthalmol 13:203–209

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rohrschneider K, Bultmann S (2001) Fundus-controlled functional evaluation in macular diseases with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Ophthalmologe 98:3–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Guez JE, Gargasson JF, Massin P et al (1998) Functional assessment of macular hole surgery by scanning laser ophthalmoscopy. Ophthalmology 105:694–699

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tsujikawa M, Ohji M, Fujikado T et al (1997) Differentiating full thickness macular holes from impending macular holes and macular pseudoholes. Br J Ophthalmol 81:117–122

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Andersen MV (1996) Scanning laser ophthalmoscope microperimetry compared with octopus perimetry in normal subjects. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 74:135–139

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sjaarda RN, Frank DA, Glaser BM et al (1993) Assessment of vision in idiopathic macular holes with macular microperimetry using the scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Ophthalmology 100:1513–1518

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rohrschneider K, Fendrich T, Völcker HE et al (1995) Static fundus perimetry using the scanning laser ophthalmoscope with an automated threshold strategy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 233:743–749

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Oyagi T, Fujikado T, Hosohata J et al (2004) Foveal sensitivity and fixation stability before and after macular translocation with 360-degree retinotomy. Retina 24:548–555

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rohrschneider K, Becker M, Fendrich T et al (1995) Kinetic fundus controlled perimetry with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 207:102–110

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ergun E, Maár N, Radner W et al (2003) Scotoma size and reading speed in patients with subfoveal occult choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology 110:65–69

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cohen SY, Lamarque F, Saucet JC et al (2003) Filling-in phenomenon in patients with age-related macular degeneration: differences regarding uni- or bilaterality of central scotoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 241:785–791

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gass JDM (1996) Macular dysfunction caused by vitreous and vitreoretinal interface abnormalities. In: Gass JDM (ed) Stereoscopic atlas of macular diseases, 4th edn. CV Mosby, St. Louis, pp 938–951

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sidd RJ, Fine SL, Owens SL et al (1982) Idiopathic preretinal gliosis. Am J Ophthalmol 94:44–48

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hirokawa H, Jalkh AE, Takahashi M et al (1986) Role of the vitreous in idiopathic preretinal macular fibrosis. Am J Ophthalmol 101:166–169

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. McDonald HR, Johnson RN, Ai E et al (2006) Macular epiretinal membranes. In: Ryan SJ, Hinton DR, Schachat AP, Wilkinson P (eds) Retina, vol 3, 4th edn. Mosby Elsevier Publishers, St. Louis, pp 2509–2525

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Mori K, Gehlbach PL, Sano A et al (2004) Comparison of epiretinal membranes of differing pathogenesis using optical coherence tomography. Retina 24:57–62

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sivalingam A, Eagle RC Jr, Duker JS et al (1990) Visual prognosis correlated with the presence of internal limiting-membrane in histopathologic specimens obtained from epiretinal membrane surgery. Ophthalmology 97:1549–1552

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wise GN (1972) Preretinal macular fibrosis. (An analysis of 90 cases). Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK 92:131–140

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Appian AP, Hirose T (1989) Secondary causes of premacular fibrosis. Ophthalmology 96:389–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Schubert HD (1989) Cystoid macular edema: the apparent role of mechanical factors. Prog Clin Biol Res 312:277–291

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Goto M, Nishimura A, Shirao Y (2000) Scanning laser ophthalmoscopic microperimetry on idiopathic epiretinal membrane and vitreomacular traction syndrome. Nihon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi 104:559–566

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Gass JDM (1987) Macular dysfunction caused by vitreous and vitreoretinal interface abnormalities. Vitreous traction maculopathies. In: Gass JDN (ed) Stereoscopic atlas of macular diseases: diagnosis and treatment, 3rd edn. CV Mosby, St. Louis, pp 676–693

    Google Scholar 

  30. Witkin AJ, Ko TH, Fujimoto JG et al (2006) Redefining lamellar holes and the vitreomacular interface: an ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography study. Ophthalmology 113:388–397

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Parolini B, Schumann RG, Cereda MG et al (2011) Lamellar macular hole: a clinicopathologic correlation of surgically excised epiretinal membranes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52:9074–9083

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Sramek SJ, Wallow ICH, Stevens TS et al (1989) Immunostaining of preretinal membranes for actin, fibronectin, and glial fibrillary acidic protein. Ophthalmology 96:835–841

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Massin P, Paques M, Masri H et al (1999) Visual outcome of surgery for epiretinal membranes with macular pseudoholes. Ophthalmology 106:580–585

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Azzolini C, Patelli F, Codenotti M et al (1999) Optical coherence tomography in idiopathic epiretinal macular membrane surgery. Eur J Ophthalmol 9:206–211

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Rice TA, De Bustros S, Michels RG et al (1986) Prognostic factors in vitrectomy for epiretinal membranes of the macula. Ophthalmology 93:602–610

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Guez JE, Le Gargasson JF, Rigaudiere F et al (1993) Is there a systematic location for the pseudo-fovea in patients with central scotoma? Vision Res 33:1271–1279

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Timberlake GT (1986) Reading with a macular scotoma. I. Retinal location of scotoma and fixation area. Invest Ophth Vis Sci 27:1137–1147

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Haritoglou C, Gass CA, Schaumberger M et al (2002) Long-term follow-up after macular hole surgery with internal limiting membrane peeling. Am J Ophthalmol 134:661–666

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Cappello E, Virgili G, Tollot L et al (2009) Reading ability and retinal sensitivity after surgery for macular hole and macular pucker. Retina 29:1111–1118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Richter-Mueksch S, Vécsei-Marlovits PV, Sacu SG et al (2007) Functional macular mapping in patients with vitreomacular pathologic features before and after surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 144:23–31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Niwa T, Terasaki H, Kondo M et al (2003) Function and morphology of macula before and after removal of idiopathic epiretinal membrane. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44:1652–1656

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Watanabe A, Arimoto S, Nishi O (2009) Correlation between metamorphopsia and epiretinal membrane optical coherence tomography findings. Ophthalmology 116:1788–1793

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Wilkins JR, Puliafito CA, Hee MR et al (1996) Characterization of epiretinal membranes using optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology 103:2142–2151

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Suh MH, Seo JM, Park KH et al (2009) Associations between macular findings by optical coherence tomography and visual outcomes after epiretinal membrane removal. Am J Ophthalmol 147:473–480

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Pilli S, Lim P, Zawadzki RJ et al (2011) Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography of eyes with idiopathic epiretinal membrane: correlation between macular morphology and visual function. Eye (Lond) 25:775–783

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Li D, Horiguchi M, Kishi S (2004) Tomographic and multifocal electroretinographic features of idiopathic epimacular membranes. Arch Ophthalmol 122:1462–1467

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Parisi V, Coppè AM, Gallinaro G et al (2007) Assessment of macular function by focal electroretinogram and pattern electroretinogram before and after epimacular membrane surgery. Retina 27:312–320

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Park SS, Choi SS, Zawadzki RJ et al (2009) Fine retinal striae associated with epiretinal membrane visualized using adaptive optics. Retin Cases Brief Rep 3:233–236

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Ooto S, Hangai M, Takayama K, Sakamoto A, Tsujikawa A, Oshima S, Inoue T, Yoshimura N (2011) High-resolution imaging of the photoreceptor layer in epiretinal membrane using adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscopy. Ophthalmology 118:873–881

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Haouchine B, Massin P, Tadayoni R et al (2004) Diagnosis of macular pseudoholes and lamellar macular holes by optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol 138:732–739

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Hee MR, Puliafito CA, Wong C et al (1995) Optical coherence tomography of macular holes. Ophthalmology 102:748–756

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Gaudric A, Haouchine B, Massin P et al (1999) Macular hole formation: new data provided by optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol 117:744–751

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Tanner V, Chauhan DS, Jackson TL et al (2001) Optical coherence tomography of the vitreoretinal interface in macular hole formation. Br J Ophthalmol 85:1092–1097

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Azzolini C, Patelli F, Brancato R (2001) Correlation between optical coherence tomography data and biomicroscopic interpretation of idiopathic macular hole. Am J Ophthalmol 132:348–355

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Haouchine B, Massin P, Gaudric A (2001) Foveal pseudocyst as the first step in macular hole formation: a prospective study by optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology 108:15–22

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Bottoni F, Carmassi L, Cigada M et al (2008) Diagnosis of macular pseudoholes and lamellar macular holes: is optical coherence tomography the “gold standard”? Br J Ophthalmol 92:635–639

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Greven CM, Slusher MM, Czyz CN et al (1998) The natural history macular pseudoholes. Am J Ophthalmol 125:360–366

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Klein BR, Hiner CJ, Glaser BM, Murphy RP, Sjaarda RN, Thompson JT (1995) Fundus photographic and fluorescein angiographic characteristics of pseudoholes of the macula in eyes with epiretinal membranes. Ophthalmology 102:768–774

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Nakabayashi M, Fujikado T, Ohji M et al (2000) Fixation patterns of idiopathic macular holes after vitreous surgery. Retina 20:170–175

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Allen AW Jr, Gass JD (1976) Contraction of a perifoveal epiretinal membrane simulating a macular hole. Am J Ophthalmol 82:684–691

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. García-Fernández M, Navarro JC, Sanz AF et al (2012) Long-term evolution of idiopathic lamellar macular holes and macular pseudoholes. Can J Ophthalmol 47:442–447

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Gass JD (1975) Lamellar macular hole: a complication of cystoid macular edema after cataract extraction: a clinicopathologic case report. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 73:230–250

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Gass JD (1988) Idiopathic senile macular hole. Its early stages and pathogenesis. Arch Ophthalmol 106:629–639

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Gass JD (1995) Reappraisal of biomicroscopic classification of stages of development of a macular hole. Am J Ophthalmol 119:752–759

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Smiddy WE, Gass JD (1995) Masquerades of macular holes. Ophthalmic Surg 26:16–24

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Byhr E, Lindblom B (1998) Preoperative measurements of macular hole with scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Correlation with functional outcome. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 76:579–583

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Ebato K, Kishi S (2000) Spontaneous closure of macular hole after posterior vitreous detachment. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 31:245–247

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Takahashi H, Kishi S (1999) Optical coherence tomography images of spontaneous macular hole closure. Am J Ophthalmol 128:519–520

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Bottoni F, Deiro AP, Giani A et al (2013) The natural history of lamellar macular holes: a spectral domain optical coherence tomography study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 251:467–475

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Reibaldi M, Parravano M, Varano M et al (2012) Foveal microstructure and functional parameters in lamellar macular hole. Am J Ophthalmol 154:974–980

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Parravano M, Oddone F, Boccassini B et al (2013) Functional and structural assessment of lamellar macular holes. Br J Ophthalmol 97:291–296

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Chen JC, Lee LR (2008) Clinical spectrum of lamellar macular defects including pseudoholes and pseudocysts defined by optical coherence tomography. Br J Ophthalmol 92:1342–1346

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Morgan CM, Schatz H (1985) Idiopathic macular holes. Am J Ophthalmol 99:437–444

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Morgan CM, Schatz H (1986) Involutional macular thinning: a premacular hole condition. Ophthalmology 93:153–161

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Ho AC, Guyer DL, Fine SL (1998) Macular hole. Surv Ophthalmol 42:393–416

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Gordon LW, Glaser BM, Ie D, Thompson JT et al (1995) Full-thickness macular hole formation with a pre-existing complete posterior vitreous detachment. Ophthalmology 102:1702–1705

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Johnson NS, Gass JDM (1988) Idiopathic macular hole. Observations, stages of formation, and implications for surgical intervention. Ophthalmology 95:917–924

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Johnson MW, Van Newkirk MR, Meyer KA (2001) Perifoveal vitreous detachment is the primary pathogenic event in idiopathic macular hole formation. Arch Ophthalmol 119:215–222

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Saito Y, Hirata Y, Hayashi A et al (2000) The visual performance and metamorphopsia of patients with macular holes. Arch Ophthalmol 118:41–46

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Tanner V, Williamson TH (2000) Watzke-Allen slit beam test in macular holes confirmed by optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol 118:1059–1063

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Amari F, Ohta K, Kojima H et al (2001) Predicting visual outcome after macular hole surgery using scanning laser ophthalmoscope microperimetry. Br J Ophthalmol 85:96–98

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Sun Z, Gan D, Jiang C et al (2012) Effect of preoperative retinal sensitivity and fixation on long-term prognosis for idiopathic macular holes. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 250:1587–1596

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. McDonnell PJ, Fine SL, Hillis AI (1982) Clinical features of idiopathic macular cysts and holes. Am J Ophthalmol 93:777–786

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Tarita-Nistor L, Gonzalez EG, Mandelcorn MS et al (2009) Fixation stability, fixation location, and visual acuity after successful macular hole surgery. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 50:84–89

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Chen WC, Wang Y, Li XX (2012) Morphologic and functional evaluation before and after successful macular hole surgery using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography combined with microperimetry. Retina 32:1733–1742

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Kitaya N, Hikichi T, Kagokawa H et al (2004) Irregularity of photoreceptor layer after successful macular hole surgery prevents visual acuity improvement. Am J Ophthalmol 138:308–310

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Chung H, Shin CJ, Kim JG et al (2011) Correlation of microperimetry with fundus autofluorescence and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in repaired macular holes. Am J Ophthalmol 151:128–136.e3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Pilli S, Zawadzki RJ, Werner JS et al (2012) Visual outcome correlates with inner macular volume in eyes with surgically closed macular hole. Retina 32:2085–2095

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Varano M, Scassa C, Capaldo N et al (2002) Development of macular pseudoholes: a 36-month period of follow-up. Retina 22:435–442

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Tadayoni R, Svorenova I, Erginay A et al (2012) Decreased retinal sensitivity after internal limiting membrane peeling for macular hole surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 96:1513–1516

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Carpineto P, Ciancaglini M, Aharrh-Gnama A et al (2005) Optical coherence tomography and fundus microperimetry imaging of spontaneous closure of traumatic macular hole: a case report. Eur J Ophthalmol 15:165–169

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Milani P, Seidenari P, Carmassi L et al (2007) Spontaneous resolution of a full thickness idiopathic macular hole: fundus autofluorescence and OCT imaging. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 245:1229–1231

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Beutel J, Dahmen G, Ziegler A et al (2007) Internal limiting membrane peeling with indocyanine green or trypan blue in macular hole surgery: a randomized trial. Arch Ophthalmol 125:326–332

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Haritoglou C, Schumann R, Reiniger I et al (2006) Evaluation of the internal limiting membrane after conventional peeling during macular hole surgery. Retina 26:21–24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Monica Varano MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Varano, M., Parravano, M., De Geronimo, D. (2014). Disorders of the Vitreoretinal Interface. In: Midena, E. (eds) Microperimetry and Multimodal Retinal Imaging. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40300-2_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40300-2_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-40299-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-40300-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics