Abstract
We may consider the existence of missing observations as unimportant, considering that the risk of misunderstanding is negligible. The surveyor assumes some model that allows adequately explaining the variable of interest. In such cases, we are able to predict the unknown values and to plug them into some estimator. Generally, the models used for imputing in sampling are not complicated and rely on simple ideas. Imputation in simple random sampling has been developed for decades; the literature is increased yearly. Ranked Set Sampling (RSS) alternatives are presented in this chapter. The efficiency of this approach is supported for the different models. On some occasions the preference of RSS is doubtful and needs numerical comparisons.
Let us act on what we have, since we have not what we wish.
Cardinal Newman
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Al-Nasser, D. A. (2007): L-ranked set sampling: A generalization procedure for robust visual sampling. Communications in Statistics: Simulation and Computation, 6, 33–43.
Al-Omari, A. I., & Jaber, K. (2008). Percentile double ranked set sampling. Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, 4, 60–64.
Al-Omari, A. I., JABER, K., & Al-Omari, A. (2008). Modified ratio-type estimators of the mean using extreme ranked set sampling. Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, 4, 150–155.
Al-Omari, A. I., Jemain, A. A., & Ibrahim, K. (2009). New ratio estimators of the mean using simple random sampling and ranked set sampling methods. Revista Investigación Operacional, 30, 97–108.
Bai, Z. D., & Chen, Z. (2003). On the theory of ranked set sampling and its ramifications. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 109, 81–99.
Bouza-Herrera C. N. (2012). Estimation of the population mean under l ranked set sampling with missing observations, aproved for publication in. International Journal of Statistics and Probability. doi10.1155/2012/214959
Bouza, C. N., & Al-Omari, A. I. (2011a). Ranked set estimation with imputation of the missing observations: the median estimator. Revista Investigación Operacional, 2, 30–37.
Bouza, C. N., & Al-Omari, A. I. (2011b). Ratio imputation of missing data in ranked set sampling. Submitted to statistics, gsta-2011-0026.r2.
Bouza, C. N., & Al-Omari, A. I. (2013). Imputation methods of missing data for estimating the population mean using simple random sampling with known correlation coefficient. Accepted by Quality and Quantity, 47, 353–365. doi 10.1007/s11135-011-9522-1.
Bouza, C. N., & Al-Omari, A. I. (2011c). Estimating the population mean in the case of missing data using simple random sampling. To be published in statistics, doi10.1080/02331888.2010.505654.
Bouza, C. N. (2008a). Estimation of the population mean with missing observations using product type estimators. Revista Investigación Operacional, 29, 207–223.
Chang, H. J., & Huang, K. (2008). Ratio estimation in survey sampling when some observations are missing. International Journal of Information and Management Sciences, 12, 1–9.
Chang, H. J., & Huang, K. (2000b). On estimation of ratio of populatoin means in survey sampling when some observations are missing. Journal of Information & Optimization Sciences, 21, 429–436.
Chen, Z., Bai, Z., & Sinha, B. K. (2004). Ranked set sampling: theory and applications. Lectures notes in statistics, p. 176. New York: Springer.
Jemain, A. A., & Al-Omari, A. I. (2006). Multistage median ranked set samples for estimating the population mean. Pakistan Journal of Statistics, 22, 195–207.
Kadilar, C., & Cingi, H. (2008). Estimators for the population mean in the case of missing data. Communication in Statistics: Theory and Methods, 37, 2226–2236.
Liu, L., TUA, Y., LIB, Y., & ZOU, G. (2006). Imputation for missing data and variance estimation when auxiliary information is incomplete. Model Assisted Statistics and Applications, 1, 83–94.
Mutllak, H. A. (1997). Median ranked set sampling. Journal of Applied Statistical Sciences, 6, 245–255.
Muttlak, H. A. (2003). Investigating the use of quartile ranked set samples for estimating the population mean. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computation, 146, 437–443.
Young-Jae, M. (2005). Monotonicity conditions and inequality imputation for sample and non-response problems. Econometric Reviews, 24, 175–194.
Rubin, D. B. (1976). Inference and missing data. Biometrika, 63, 581–582.
Rueda, M., & González, S. (2004). Missing data and auxiliary information in surveys. Computational Statistics, 10, 559–567.
Rueda, M., Martínez, S., Martínez, H., & Arcos, A. (2006). Mean estimation with calibration techniques in presence of missing data. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 50, 3263–3277.
Samawi, H. M., & Muttlak, H. A. (1996). Estimation of ratio using rank set sampling. Biometrical Journal, 36, 753–764.
Singh, S., & Deo, B. (2003). Imputation by power transformation. Statistical Papers, 44, 555–579.
Singh, S., & Horn, S. (2000). Compromised imputation in survey sampling. Metrika, 51, 267–276.
Takahasi, K., & Wakimoto, K. (1968). On unbiased estimates of population mean based on the sample stratified by means of ordering. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 20, 1–31.
Toutenburg, H., Srivastava, V. K., & SHALABH, V. (2008). Amputation versus imputation of missing values through ratio method in sample surveys. Statistical Papers, 49, 237–247.
Tsukerman, E. V. (2004). Optimal linear estimation of missing observations (in Russian). Studies in information science. Kazan. Lzd. Otechetsvo, 2, 77–96.
Zou, U., Feng, S., & Qin, H. (2002). Sample rotation with missing data. Science in China Series A, 45, 42–63.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bouza-Herrera, C.N. (2013). Imputation of the Missing Data. In: Handling Missing Data in Ranked Set Sampling. SpringerBriefs in Statistics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39899-5_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39899-5_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-39898-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-39899-5
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)