Skip to main content

Inconsistency Management for Description Logic Programs and Beyond

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 7994))

Abstract

Description logic programs are a declarative approach to access ontological knowledge bases through a query interface, and to combine the query results using rules that can be nonmonotonic. Noticeably, a bidirectional information flow between the rules and the ontology is supported, which opens the possibility of sophisticated data exchange and advanced reasoning tasks on top of ontologies. As it happens, inconsistency may arise from the interplay of the rules and the ontology. We consider this issue and discuss different origins of inconsistency, as well as approaches to deal with it. While recent progress has been made, several issues remain to be explored; among them is inconsistency management for generalizations of description logic programs, and in particular for HEX programs, where this issues is largely unexplored and challenging, the more if distributed or web-based evaluation scenarios are considered.

This work was supported by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) projects P20480 and P24090.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bertossi, L., Hunter, A., Schaub, T. (eds.): Inconsistency Tolerance. LNCS, vol. 3300. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bienvenu, M.: On the complexity of consistent query answering in the presence of simple ontologies. In: Proc. 26th Conf. Artificial Intelligence, pp. 705–711. AAAI Press (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Eiter, T., Fink, M., Stepanova, D.: Data repair of inconsistent dl-programs. In: Proc. 23rd Int’l Joint Conf. Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2013). AAAI Press/IJCAI (to appear, 2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Eiter, T., Ianni, G., Lukasiewicz, T., Schindlauer, R., Tompits, H.: Combining answer set programming with description logics for the Semantic Web. AIJ 172, 1495–1539 (2008)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Eiter, T., Ianni, G., Schindlauer, R., Tompits, H.: A uniform integration of higher-order reasoning and external evaluations in answer-set programming. In: Proc. 19th Int’l Joint Conf. Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2005), pp. 90–96. Professional Book Center (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fink, M.: Paraconsistent hybrid theories. In: Proc. 13th Int’l Conf. Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR 2012), pp. 141–151. AAAI Press (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hunter, A.: Paraconsistent logics. In: Handbook of Defeasible Reasoning and Uncertainty Management Systems, vol. 2, pp. 11–36. Kluwer (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lembo, D., Lenzerini, M., Rosati, R., Ruzzi, M., Savo, D.F.: Inconsistency-tolerant semantics for description logics. In: Hitzler, P., Lukasiewicz, T. (eds.) RR 2010. LNCS, vol. 6333, pp. 103–117. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Ma, Y., Hitzler, P., Lin, Z.: Paraconsistent reasoning for expressive and tractable description logics. In: Proc. DL 2008. CEUR Workshop Proc., vol. 353. CEUR-WS.org (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Motik, B., Rosati, R.: Reconciling description logics and rules. J. ACM 57(5) (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pührer, J., Heymans, S., Eiter, T.: Dealing with inconsistency when combining ontologies and rules using DL-programs. In: Aroyo, L., Antoniou, G., Hyvönen, E., ten Teije, A., Stuckenschmidt, H., Cabral, L., Tudorache, T. (eds.) ESWC 2010, Part I. LNCS, vol. 6088, pp. 183–197. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Sakama, C., Inoue, K.: An abductive framework for computing knowledge base updates. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming 3(6), 671–713 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang, Y., You, J.H., Yuan, L.Y., Shen, Y.D., Zhang, M.: The loop formula based semantics of description logic programs. Theor. Comput. Sci. 415, 60–85 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Eiter, T., Fink, M., Stepanova, D. (2013). Inconsistency Management for Description Logic Programs and Beyond. In: Faber, W., Lembo, D. (eds) Web Reasoning and Rule Systems. RR 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7994. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39666-3_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39666-3_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-39665-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-39666-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics