Skip to main content

Comparing CMOS-Based and NEMS-Based Adiabatic Logic Circuits

  • Conference paper
Book cover Reversible Computation (RC 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 7948))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this paper, a detailed comparison between the expected performance of CMOS-based and nanoelectromechanical systems (NEMS) based adiabatic logic circuits is presented. The modeling of the NEMS devices is done using a 1-dimensional reduced order model (1d ROM) of the electromechanical switches. This model will give an honest analytical depiction of the NEMS-based adiabatic circuits. The performance of NEMS-based circuits compares favorably with that of CMOS-based circuits. To the best knowledge of the authors, this is the first reported detailed comparison between NEMS and CMOS devices for adiabatic circuits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 72.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Collinge, J.P.: Silicon-on- Insulator Technology: Materials to VLSI. Kluwer (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hisamoto, D., Lee, W.C., Kedzierski, J., Takeuchi, H., Asano, K., Kuo, C., Anderson, E., King, T.J., Bokor, J., Hu, C.M.: FinFET-A Self-Aligned Double-Gate MOSFET Scalable to 20 nm. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices 47, 2320–2325 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Singh, N., Agarwal, A., Bera, L.K., Liow, T.Y., Yang, R., Rustagi, S.C., Tung, C.H., Kumar, R., Lo, G.Q., Balasubramanian, N., Kwong, D.L.: A dual-strained CMOS structure through simultaneous formation of relaxed and compressive strained-SiGe-on-insulator. IEEE Electron Device Letters 27, 350–353 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chau, R., Datta, S., Majumder, A.: Opportunities and challenges of III-V nanoelectronics for future high-speed, low-power applications. In: IEEE Compound Semiconductor Integrated Circuit Symposium, Palm Springs (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Javey, A., Guo, J., Wang, Q., Lundstrom, M., Dai, H.: Ballistic carbon nanotube field-effect transistors. Nature 424, 654–657 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Koller, J.G., Athas, W.C.: Adiabatic switching, low energey computing, and the physics of storing and erasing information. In: Proceedings Workshop on Physics and Computation, pp. 267–270 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bennett, C.H.: Logical reversibility of computation. IBM Journal of Research and Development 17, 525–532 (1973)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. De Vos, A.: Reversible Computing: Fundamentals, Quantum Computing, and Applications. Wiley-VCH (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Benioff, P.: The Computer as a Physical System: A Microscopic Quantum-Mechanical Hamiltonian Model of Computers as Represented by Turing Machines. Journal of Statistical Physics 22, 563–591 (1980)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Athas, W.C., Svensson, L.: Reversible logic issues in adiabatic CMOS. In: Workshop on Physics and Computation Proceedings, pp. 111–118 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Teichmann, P.: Adiabatic Logic: Future Trend and System Level Perspective. Springer, Dordrecht (2012)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Loh, O., Espinosa, H.D.: Nanoelectromechanical contact switches. Nature Nanotechnology 7, 283–295 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Nathanson, H.C.: The Resonant Gate Transistor. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices 14, 117–133 (1967)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Houri, S., Valentian, A., Fanet, H. (2013). Comparing CMOS-Based and NEMS-Based Adiabatic Logic Circuits. In: Dueck, G.W., Miller, D.M. (eds) Reversible Computation. RC 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7948. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38986-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38986-3_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-38985-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-38986-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics