Abstract
This chapter considers how ontology matching techniques and human users interact from a technical perspective (rather than from organisational or social ones (von Hippel 2005)). This may occur because some functions of matching, such as finding anchors, are partially or completely carried out by individual users (Sect. 11.1) or sets of users (Sect. 11.2). The ability to explain alignments to users is also an important factor in the success of user involvement (Sect. 11.3). Finally, special attention is paid to tools for communicating with users and, more particularly, to alignment visualisers and editors (Sect. 11.4).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Alexe, B., Chiticariu, L., Miller, R., Tan, W.C.: Muse: Mapping Understanding and deSign by Example. In: Proc. 24th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE), Cancún, Mexico, pp. 10–19 (2008a)
Aumüller, D., Do, H.-H., Maßmann, S., Rahm, E.: Schema and ontology matching with COMA++. In: Proc. 24th International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD), Software Demonstration, Baltimore, MD, USA, pp. 906–908 (2005)
Caracciolo, C., Euzenat, J., Hollink, L., Ichise, R., Isaac, A., Malaisé, V., Meilicke, C., Pane, J., Shvaiko, P., Stuckenschmidt, H., Šváb-Zamazal, O., Svátek, V.: Results of the ontology alignment evaluation initiative 2008. In: Proc. 3rd International Workshop on Ontology Matching (OM) at the 7th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC), Karlsruhe, Germany, pp. 73–119 (2008)
Conroy, C., Brennan, R., O’Sullivan, D., Lewis, D.: User evaluation study of a tagging approach to semantic mapping. In: Proc. 6th European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC), Hersounisous, Greece. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 5554, pp. 623–637 (2009)
Correndo, G., Alani, H., Smart, P.: A community based approach for managing ontology alignments. In: Proc. 3rd International Workshop on Ontology Matching (OM) at the 7th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC), Karlsruhe, Germany, pp. 61–72 (2008)
Davis, M., Putnam, H.: A computing procedure for quantification theory. J. ACM 7(3), 201–215 (1960)
Davis, M., Longemann, G., Loveland, D.: A machine program for theorem proving. Commun. ACM 5(7), 394–397 (1962)
Dewaraja, S.: CLONTY: a scalable approach to collaborative ontology alignment. B.Sc. thesis, The University of Westminster, Westminster, UK (2010)
Dhamankar, R., Lee, Y., Doan, A.-H., Halevy, A., Domingos, P.: iMAP: discovering complex semantic matches between database schemas. In: Proc. 23rd International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD), Paris, France, pp. 383–394 (2004)
El Jerroudi, Z., Ziegler, J.: iMERGE: interactive ontology merging. In: Proc. 16th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management (EKAW), Demo Track, Acitrezza, Italy, pp. 52–56 (2008)
Falconer, S., Storey, M.-A.: A cognitive support framework for ontology mapping. In: Proc. 6th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC) and 2nd Asian Semantic Web Conference (ASWC), Busan, Korea. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4825, pp. 114–127 (2007)
Falconer, S., Bull, I., Grammel, L., Storey, M.-A.: Creating visualizations through ontology mapping. In: Proc. 3rd International Conference on Complex, Intelligent and Software Intensive Systems (CISIS), Fukuoka, Japan, pp. 688–693 (2009)
Horridge, M., Bail, S., Parsia, B., Sattler, U.: The cognitive complexity of OWL justifications. In: Proc. 10th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC), Bonn, Germany. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 7031, pp. 241–256 (2011)
Horridge, M., Parsia, B., Sattler, U.: Justification masking in ontologies. In: Proc. 13th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR), Rome, Italy, pp. 623–627 (2012)
Kerrigan, M., Mocan, A., Tanler, M., Fensel, D.: The web service modeling toolkit: an integrated development environment for semantic web services. In: Proc. 4th European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC) System Description Track, Innsbruck, Austria, pp. 303–317 (2007)
Laera, L., Tamma, V., Euzenat, J., Bench-Capon, T., Payne, T.: Reaching agreement over ontology alignments. In: Proc. 5th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC), Athens, GA, USA. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4273, pp. 371–384 (2006)
Lambrix, P., Kaliyaperumal, R.: A session-based approach for aligning large ontologies. In: Proc. 10th European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC), Montpellier, France. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 7881, pp. 46–60 (2013)
Lanzenberger, M., Sampson, J.: AlViz: a tool for visual ontology alignment. In: Proc. 10th International Conference on Information Visualisation (IV), London, UK, pp. 430–440 (2006)
Le Berre, D., Parrain, A.: The sat4j library, release 2.2. J. Satisf. Boolean Model. Comput. 7(2–3), 59–64 (2010)
Léger, A., Nixon, L., Shvaiko, P.: On identifying knowledge processing requirements. In: Proc. 4th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC), Galway, Ireland. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3729, pp. 928–943 (2005)
McCann, R., Shen, W., Doan, A.-H.: Matching schemas in online communities: a web 2.0 approach. In: Proc. 24th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE), Cancún, Mexico, pp. 110–119 (2008)
McGuinness, D., Pinheiro da Silva, P.: Infrastructure for web explanations. In: Proc. 2nd International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC), Sanibel Island, FL, USA. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2870, pp. 113–129 (2003)
McGuinness, D., Pinheiro da Silva, P.: Explaining answers from the semantic web: the Inference Web approach. J. Web Semant. 1(4), 397–413 (2004)
McGuinness, D., Fikes, R., Rice, J., Wilder, S.: An environment for merging and testing large ontologies. In: Proc. 7th International Conference on the Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR), Breckenridge, CO, USA, pp. 483–493 (2000)
Mocan, A., Cimpian, E.: An ontology-based data mediation framework for semantic environments. Int. J. Semantic Web Inf. Syst. 3(2), 69–98 (2007)
Noy, N., Musen, M.: PROMPT: algorithm and tool for automated ontology merging and alignment. In: Proc. 17th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), Austin, TX, USA, pp. 450–455 (2000)
Pachêco, T., Pereira, A., Pires, C.E., Salgado, A.C.: Exploring web semantic knowledge and user feedback to improve ontology matching. In: Proc. 10th International Workshop on Web Semantics (WebS) at the 22nd International Conference on Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA), Toulouse, France, pp. 234–238 (2011)
Peukert, E., Eberius, J., Rahm, E.: AMC: a framework for modelling and comparing matching systems as matching processes. In: Proc. 27th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE), Hannover, Germany, pp. 1304–1307 (2011)
Pinheiro da Silva, P., McGuinness, D., Fikes, R.: A proof markup language for semantic web services. Inf. Sci. 31(4), 381–395 (2006)
Sarasua, C., Simperl, E., Noy, N.: CrowdMAP: crowdsourcing ontology alignment with microtasks. In: Proc. 11th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC), Boston, MA, USA. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 7649, pp. 525–541 (2012)
Sarma, A.D., Dong, X., Halevy, A.: Bootstrapping pay-as-you-go data integration systems. In: Proc. 27th International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD), Vancouver, BC, Canada, pp. 861–874 (2008)
Shvaiko, P., Giunchiglia, F., Pinheiro da Silva, P., McGuinness, D.: Web explanations for semantic heterogeneity discovery. In: Proc. 2nd European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC), Hersounisous, Greece. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3532, pp. 303–317 (2005)
Thaler, S., Simperl, E.P.B., Siorpaes, K.: SpotTheLink: playful alignment of ontologies. In: Proc. 26th ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC), Tai Chung, Taiwan, pp. 1711–1712 (2011)
Trojahn, C., Euzenat, J., Tamma, V., Payne, T.: Argumentation for reconciling agent ontologies. In: Elai, A., Kona, M., Orgun, M. (eds.) Semantic Agent Systems, pp. 89–111. Springer, New York (2011). Chap. 5
van Ham, F., van Wijk, J.: Interactive visualization of small world graphs. In: Proc. 10th Symposium on Information Visualization (InfoVis), Austin, TX, USA, pp. 199–206 (2004)
von Hippel, E.: Democratizing Innovation. MIT Press, Cambridge (2005)
Zhdanova, A., Shvaiko, P.: Community-driven ontology matching. In: Proc. 3rd European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC), Budva, Montenegro. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4011, pp. 34–49 (2006)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Euzenat, J., Shvaiko, P. (2013). User Involvement. In: Ontology Matching. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38721-0_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38721-0_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-38720-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-38721-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)