Skip to main content

Redundant Elements in SNOMED CT Concept Definitions

  • Conference paper
Book cover Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (AIME 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 7885))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

While redundant elements in SNOMED CT concept definitions are harmless from a logical point of view, they unnecessarily make concept definitions of typically large ontologies such as SNOMED CT hard to construct and to maintain. In this paper, we apply a fully automated method to detect intra-axiom redundancies in SNOMED CT. We systematically analyse the completeness and soundness of the results of our method by examining the identified redundant elements. In absence of a gold standard, we check whether our method identifies concepts that are likely to contain redundant elements because they become equivalent to their stated subsumer when they are replaced by a fully defined concept with the same definition. To evaluate soundness, we remove all identified redundancies, and test whether the logical closure is preserved by comparing the concept hierarchy to the one of the official SNOMED CT distribution. We found that 35,010 of the 296,433 SNOMED CT concepts (12%) contain redundant elements in their definitions, and that the results of our method are sound and complete with respect to our partial evaluation. We recommend to free the stated form from these redundancies. In future, knowledge modellers should be supported by being pointed to newly introduced redundancies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baader, F., Lutz, C., Suntisrivaraporn, B.: Is tractable reasoning in extensions of the description logic EL useful in practice? In: Proceedings of the 2005 International Workshop on Methods for Modalities, pp. 1–26 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cimino, J.J.: Battling Scylla and Charybdis: the search for redundancy and ambiguity in the 2001 UMLS metathesaurus. In: Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium, pp. 120–124 (January 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cornet, R., Abu-Hanna, A.: Two DL-based methods for auditing medical terminological systems. In: AMIA Symposium, pp. 166–170 (January 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cornet, R., Abu-Hanna, A.: Auditing description-logic-based medical terminological systems by detecting equivalent concept definitions. International Journal of Medical Informatics 77(5), 336–345 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cornet, R., Schulz, S.: Relationship groups in SNOMED CT. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 31(0), 223–227 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Denaux, R., Thakker, D., Dimitrova, V., Cohn, A.: Entendre: Interactive Semantic Feedback for Ontology Authoring, files.ifi.uzh.ch

  7. Gonçalves, R., Parsia, B., Sattler, U.: Ecco: A Hybrid Diff Tool for OWL 2 ontologies. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on OWL: Experiences and Directions (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Grimm, S., Wissmann, J.: Elimination of redundancy in ontologies. In: Antoniou, G., Grobelnik, M., Simperl, E., Parsia, B., Plexousakis, D., De Leenheer, P., Pan, J. (eds.) ESWC 2011, Part I. LNCS, vol. 6643, pp. 260–274. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Horridge, M., Bechhofer, S.: The OWL API: A Java API for Working with OWL 2 Ontologies. In: 6th OWL Experienced and Directions Workshop (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Peng, Y., Halper, M.H., Perl, Y., Geller, J.: Auditing the UMLS for redundant classifications. In: AMIA Symposium, pp. 612–616 (January 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Schlobach, S., Cornet, R.: Logical support for terminological modeling. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 107, 439–443 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sirin, E., Parsia, B., Grau, B.C., Kalyanpur, A., Katz, Y.: Pellet: A practical OWL-DL reasoner. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web 5(2), 51–53 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Spackman, K.A.: Normal forms for description logic expressions of clinical concepts in SNOMED RT. In: Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium, pp. 627–631 (January 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Spackman, K.A., Dionne, R., Mays, E., Weis, J.: Role grouping as an extension to the description logic of Ontylog, motivated by concept modeling in SNOMED. In: Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium, 712–746 (January 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kazakov, Y., Krötzsch, M., Simančík, F.: Concurrent Classification of \(\mathcal{EL}\) Ontologies. In: Aroyo, L., Welty, C., Alani, H., Taylor, J., Bernstein, A., Kagal, L., Noy, N., Blomqvist, E. (eds.) ISWC 2011, Part I. LNCS, vol. 7031, pp. 305–320. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhu, X., Fan, J.-W., Baorto, D.M., Weng, C., Cimino, J.J.: A review of auditing methods applied to the content of controlled biomedical terminologies. Journal of biomedical informatics 42(3), 413–425 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dentler, K., Cornet, R. (2013). Redundant Elements in SNOMED CT Concept Definitions. In: Peek, N., Marín Morales, R., Peleg, M. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. AIME 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7885. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38326-7_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38326-7_29

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-38325-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-38326-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics