Abstract
A particularly difficult class of scheduling and routing problems involves an objective that is a sum of time-varying action costs, which increases the size and complexity of the problem. Solve-and-improve approaches, which find an initial solution for a simplified model and improve it using a cost function, and Mixed Integer Programming (MIP) are often used for solving such problems. However, Constraint Programming (CP), particularly with Lazy Clause Generation (LCG), has been found to be faster than MIP for some scheduling problems with time-varying action costs. In this paper, we compare CP and LCG against a solve-and-improve approach for two recently introduced problems in maritime logistics with time-varying action costs: the Liner Shipping Fleet Repositioning Problem (LSFRP) and the Bulk Port Cargo Throughput Optimisation Problem (BPCTOP). We present a novel CP model for the LSFRP, which is faster than all previous methods and outperforms a simplified automated planning model without time-varying costs. We show that a LCG solver is faster for solving the BPCTOP than a standard finite domain CP solver with a simplified model. We find that CP and LCG are effective methods for solving scheduling problems, and are worth investigating for other scheduling and routing problems that are currently being solved using MIP or solve-and-improve approaches.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Achterberg, T.: SCIP: solving constraint integer programs. Mathematical Programming Computation 1(1), 1–41 (2009)
Christiansen, M., Fagerholt, K.: Robust ship scheduling with multiple time windows. Naval Research Logistics 49(6), 611–625 (2002)
Christiansen, M., Fagerholt, K., Nygreen, B., Ronen, D.: Chapter 4: Maritime transportation. In: Barnhart, C., Laporte, G. (eds.) Transportation. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science, vol. 14, pp. 189–284. Elsevier (2007)
Christiansen, M., Fagerholt, K., Ronen, D.: Ship routing and scheduling: status and perspectives. Transportation Science 38(1), 1–18 (2004)
Chu, G., de la Banda, M.G., Mears, C., Stuckey, P.J.: Symmetries and lazy clause generation. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP 2010) Doctoral Programme, pp. 43–48 (September 2010)
Coles, A.J., Coles, A.I., Fox, M., Long, D.: Forward-Chaining Partial-Order Planning. In: Proceedings of the Twentieth International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling (ICAPS 2010) (May 2010)
Cordeau, J.-F., Desaulniers, G., Desrosiers, J., Solomon, M.M., Soumis, F.: VRP with time windows. In: Toth, P., Vigo, D. (eds.) The Vehicle Routing Problem. SIAM Monographs on Discrete Mathematics and Applications, vol. 9, ch. 7, pp. 157–194. SIAM (2002)
Fagerholt, K.: Ship scheduling with soft time windows: an optimisation based approach. European Journal of Operational Research 131(3), 559–571 (2001)
Fagerholt, K.: A computer-based decision support system for vessel fleet scheduling - experience and future research. Decision Support Systems 37(1), 35–47 (2004)
Fagerholt, K., Laporte, G., Norstad, I.: Reducing fuel emissions by optimizing speed on shipping routes. Journal of the Operational Research Society 61, 523–529 (2010)
Feydy, T., Stuckey, P.J.: Lazy clause generation reengineered. In: Gent, I.P. (ed.) CP 2009. LNCS, vol. 5732, pp. 352–366. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
Figliozzi, M.A.: The time dependent vehicle routing problem with time windows: Benchmark problems, an efficient solution algorithm, and solution characteristics. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 48(3), 616–636 (2012)
Fox, M., Long, D.: PDDL2.1: An extension to PDDL for expressing temporal planning domains. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 20(1), 61–124 (2003)
Kelareva, E., Brand, S., Kilby, P., Thiébaux, S., Wallace, M.: CP and MIP methods for ship scheduling with time-varying draft. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling (ICAPS 2012), pp. 110–118 (June 2012)
Kelareva, E., Kilby, P., Thiébaux, S., Wallace, M.: Ship scheduling with time-varying draft: Constraint programming and benders decomposition. Transportation Science (2012) (submitted)
Kilby, P., Verden, A.: Flexible routing combing constraint programming, large neighbourhood search, and feature-based insertion. In: Schill, K., Scholz-Reiter, B., Frommberger, L. (eds.) Proceedings 2nd Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Logistics (AILOG 2011), pp. 43–49 (2011)
Lin, W.C., Liao, D.Y., Liu, C.Y., Lee, Y.Y.: Daily imaging scheduling of an earth observation satellite. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans 35(2), 213–223 (2005)
Nethercote, N., Marriott, K., Rafeh, R., Wallace, M., de la Banda, M.G.: Specification of Zinc and MiniZinc (November 2010)
Nethercote, N., Stuckey, P.J., Becket, R., Brand, S., Duck, G.J., Tack, G.: MiniZinc: Towards a standard CP modelling language. In: Bessière, C. (ed.) CP 2007. LNCS, vol. 4741, pp. 529–543. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
Norstad, I., Fagerholt, K., Laporte, G.: Tramp ship routing and scheduling with speed optimization. Transportation Research 19, 853–865 (2011)
Ohrimenko, O., Stuckey, P.J., Codish, M.: Propagation via lazy clause generation. Constraints 14(3), 357–391 (2009)
OMC International. DUKC helps Port Hedland set ship loading record (2009), http://www.omc-international.com/images/stories/press/omc-20090810-news-in-wa.pdf
Port Hedland Port Authority. 2009/10 cargo statistics and port information (2011), http://www.phpa.com.au/docs/CargoStatisticsReport.pdf
Qureshi, A.G., Taniguchi, E., Yamada, T.: An exact solution approach for vehicle routing and scheduling problems with soft time windows. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 45(6), 960–977 (2009)
Rakke, J.G., Christiansen, M., Fagerholt, K., Laporte, G.: The traveling salesman problem with draft limits. Computers & Operations Research 39, 2161–2167 (2011)
Russell, A.H.: Cash flows in networks. Management Science 16(5), 357–373 (1970)
Schutt, A., Chu, G., Stuckey, P.J., Wallace, M.G.: Maximising the net present value for resource-constrained project scheduling. In: Beldiceanu, N., Jussien, N., Pinson, É. (eds.) CPAIOR 2012. LNCS, vol. 7298, pp. 362–378. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
Schutt, A., Feydy, T., Stuckey, P.J., Wallace, M.G.: Solving the resource constrained project scheduling problem with generalised precedences by lazy clause generation (2010), http://arxiv.org/abs/1009.0347
Sexton, T.R., Choi, Y.: Pickup and delivery of partial loads with soft time windows. American Journal of Mathematical and Management Science 6, 369–398 (1985)
Smith, S.: Is scheduling a solved problem? In: Multidisciplinary Scheduling: Theory and Applications, pp. 3–17 (2005)
Song, J.-H., Furman, K.C.: A maritime inventory routing problem: Practical approach. Computers & Operations Research (2010)
Tierney, K., Coles, A., Coles, A., Kroer, C., Britt, A.M., Jensen, R.M.: Automated planning for liner shipping fleet repositioning. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling (ICAPS 2012), pp. 279–287 (June 2012)
Tierney, K., Jensen, R.M.: The liner shipping fleet repositioning problem with cargo flows. In: Hu, H., Shi, X., Stahlbock, R., Voß, S. (eds.) ICCL 2012. LNCS, vol. 7555, pp. 1–16. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
University of Melbourne. MiniZinc Challenge 2011 (2011), http://www.g12.cs.mu.oz.au/minizinc/challenge2011/challenge.html
Vanhoucke, M., Demeulemeester, E.L., Herroelen, W.S.: On maximizing the net present value of a project under renewable resource constraints. Management Science 47, 1113–1121 (2001)
Wallace, M.: G12 - Towards the Separation of Problem Modelling and Problem Solving. In: van Hoeve, W.-J., Hooker, J.N. (eds.) CPAIOR 2009. LNCS, vol. 5547, pp. 8–10. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
Wang, J., Jing, N., Li, J., Chen, H.: A multi-objective imaging scheduling approach for earth observing satellites. In: Proceedings of the 9th Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation (GECCO 2007), pp. 2211–2218 (2007)
Wolfe, W.J., Sorensen, S.E.: Three scheduling algorithms applied to the earth observing systems domain. Management Science 46(1), 148–168 (2000)
Yao, F., Li, J., Bai, B., He, R.: Earth observation satellites scheduling based on decomposition optimization algorithm. International Journal of Image, Graphics and Signal Processing 1, 10–18 (2010)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kelareva, E., Tierney, K., Kilby, P. (2013). CP Methods for Scheduling and Routing with Time-Dependent Task Costs. In: Gomes, C., Sellmann, M. (eds) Integration of AI and OR Techniques in Constraint Programming for Combinatorial Optimization Problems. CPAIOR 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7874. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38171-3_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38171-3_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-38170-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-38171-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)