Abstract
Driven by an ever-increasing demand for agricultural provisioning services, large areas of tropical forest have been lost worldwide during recent decades. The conversion of forests into agricultural land results in rarely quantified losses of social and ecological services and triggers soil erosion, sedimentation, and climate change. Conceptual considerations identify a strong need for improved and sustainable agriculture to solve this problem. A combination of intensified agriculture, conservation payments to avoid forest loss, and land-use diversification may provide a solution to land-use conflicts. Improved concepts must lead to the production of enough food to keep food prices at a reasonable level. Future research must thus focus on concepts to intensify agricultural production while ensuring sustainability by avoiding the detrimental consequences of the intensification such as the loss of biodiversity, erosion, subsequent land degradation, and the pollution of water reservoirs.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Bacon C (2005) Confronting the coffee crisis: can fair trade, organic, and specialty coffees reduce small-scale farmer vulnerability in Northern Nicaragua? World Dev 33(3):497–511
Baumgärtner S, Quaas M (2010) Managing increasing environmental risks through agro-biodiversity and agro-environmental policies. Agric Econ 41:483–496
Benton TG, Vickery JA, Wilson JD (2003) Farm land biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key? Trends Ecol Evol 18:182–188
Bommert W (2012) Bodenrausch. Bastei Lübbe, Köln
Burney JA, Davis SJ, Lobell DB (2010) Greenhouse gas mitigation by agricultural intensification. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:12052–12057
Daly HE (1992) Allocation, distribution, and scale: towards an economics that is efficient, just, and sustainable. Ecol Econ 6:185–193
Eliasch J (2008) Climate change: financing global forests. Eliasch Review. The Stationary Office, Crown
FAO (2012) FAOSTAT (agriculture and food statistics). http://faostat.fao.org/default.aspx. Accessed 10 Mar 2012
Fearnside PM (2001) Saving forests as a global warming countermeasure: an issue that divides the environmental movement. Ecol Econ 39:167–184
Ferraro PJ, Kiss A (2002) Ecology: direct payments to conserve biodiversity. Science 298:1718–1719
Fischer J, Batary P, Bawa KS et al (2011) Conservation: limits of land sparing. Science 334:593
FRA (2010) Global forest resource assessment 2010. FAO Forestry Paper 163, Rome
Gerique Zipfel A (2010) Biodiversity as a resource: plant use and land use among the Shuar, Saraguros, and Mestizos in tropical rainforest areas of southern Ecuador. PhD Thesis, Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen
Günter S, Gonzalez P, Álvarez G, Aguirre N, Palomeque X, Haubrich F, Weber M (2009) Determinants for successful reforestation of abandoned pastures in the Andes: soil conditions and vegetation cover. For Ecol Manage 258:81–91
Haber W (1990) Basic concepts of landscape ecology and their application in land management. Physiol Ecol Japan 27(special issue):131–146
Hildebrandt P, Knoke T (2011) Investment decisions under uncertainty – a methodological review on forest science studies. For Policy Econ 13:1–15
Hubacek K, van den Bergh JJM (2006) Changing concepts of ‘land’ in economic theory: from single to multi-disciplinary approaches. Ecol Econ 56:5–27
Knoke T, Huth A (2011) Modelling forest growth and finance: often disregarded tools in tropical land management. Tropical forestry, vol 8, Silviculture in the tropics, Part 3. Springer Berlin, pp 129–142. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-19986-8_11
Knoke T, Stimm B, Weber M (2008) Tropical farmers need productive alternatives. Nature 452:934
Knoke T, Calvas B, Aguirre N, Román-Cuesta R, Günter S, Stimm B, Weber M, Mosandl R (2009a) Can tropical farmers reconcile subsistence needs with forest conservation? Front Ecol Environ 7:548–554
Knoke T, Weber M, Barkmann J, Pohle P, Calvas B, Medina C, Aguirre N, Günter S, Stimm B, Mosandl R, Walter F, Maza B, Gerique A (2009b) Effectiveness and distributional impacts of payments for reduced carbon emissions from deforestation. Erdkunde 63:365–384
Knoke T, Steinbeis O, Bösch M, Roman-Cuesta R, Burkhardt T (2011) Cost-effective compensation to avoid carbon emissions from forest loss: an approach to consider price-quantity effects and risk-aversion. Ecol Econ 70:1139–1153
Koellner T, Schmitz OJ (2006) Biodiversity, ecosystem function, and investment risk. Bioscience 56:977–985
Mosandl R, Günter S, Stimm B, Weber M (2008) Ecuador suffers the highest deforestation rate in South America. In: Beck E, Bendix J, Kottke I, Makeschin F, Mosandl R (eds) Gradients in a tropical Mountain Ecosystem of Ecuador, vol 198, Ecological studies. Springer, Berlin, pp 37–40
Nair PKR, Gordon AM, Mosquera-Losada MR (2008) Agroforestry. In: Sven EJ, Brian F (eds) Encyclopedia of ecology. Academic, Oxford, pp 101–110
Perfecto I, Vandermeer J (2010) The agroecological matrix as alternative to the landsparing/agriculture intensification model. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:5786–5791
Phalan B, Onial M, Balmford A, Green RE (2011) Reconciling food production and biodiversity conservation: land sharing and land sparing compared. Science 333:1289–1291
Torquebiau EF (2000) A renewed perspective on agroforestry concepts and classification. Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences – Series III – Sciences de la Vie 323, 1009–1017
Torras M (2000) The total economic value of Amazonian deforestation, 1978–1993. Ecol Econ 33:283–297
Van der Werf W, Keesman K, Burgess P, Graves A, Pilbeam D, Incoll LD, Metselaar K, Mayus M, Stappers R, van Keulen H, Palma J, Dupraz C (2007) Yield-SAFE: a parameter-sparse, process-based dynamic model for predicting resource capture, growth, and production in agroforestry systems. Ecol Eng 29:419–433
Walter C, Stützel H (2009) A new method for assessing the sustainability of land-use systems (II): evaluating impact indicators. Ecol Econ 68:1288–1300
Wise M, Calvin K, Thomson A, Clarke L, Bond-Lamberty B, Sands R, Smith SJ, Janetos A, Edmonds J (2009) Implications of limiting CO2 concentrations for land use and energy. Science 324:1183–1186
Wunder S, Engel S, Pagiola S (2008) Taking stock: a comparative analysis of payments for environmental services programs in developed and developing countries. Ecol Econ 65:834–852
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Calvas, B. et al. (2013). Sustainable Agriculture and Conservation Payments Are Key Factors in Mitigating Tropical Forest Loss. In: Bendix, J., et al. Ecosystem Services, Biodiversity and Environmental Change in a Tropical Mountain Ecosystem of South Ecuador. Ecological Studies, vol 221. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38137-9_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38137-9_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-38136-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-38137-9
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)