Skip to main content

Sustainable Agriculture and Conservation Payments Are Key Factors in Mitigating Tropical Forest Loss

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Ecological Studies ((ECOLSTUD,volume 221))

Abstract

Driven by an ever-increasing demand for agricultural provisioning services, large areas of tropical forest have been lost worldwide during recent decades. The conversion of forests into agricultural land results in rarely quantified losses of social and ecological services and triggers soil erosion, sedimentation, and climate change. Conceptual considerations identify a strong need for improved and sustainable agriculture to solve this problem. A combination of intensified agriculture, conservation payments to avoid forest loss, and land-use diversification may provide a solution to land-use conflicts. Improved concepts must lead to the production of enough food to keep food prices at a reasonable level. Future research must thus focus on concepts to intensify agricultural production while ensuring sustainability by avoiding the detrimental consequences of the intensification such as the loss of biodiversity, erosion, subsequent land degradation, and the pollution of water reservoirs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bacon C (2005) Confronting the coffee crisis: can fair trade, organic, and specialty coffees reduce small-scale farmer vulnerability in Northern Nicaragua? World Dev 33(3):497–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgärtner S, Quaas M (2010) Managing increasing environmental risks through agro-biodiversity and agro-environmental policies. Agric Econ 41:483–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benton TG, Vickery JA, Wilson JD (2003) Farm land biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key? Trends Ecol Evol 18:182–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bommert W (2012) Bodenrausch. Bastei Lübbe, Köln

    Google Scholar 

  • Burney JA, Davis SJ, Lobell DB (2010) Greenhouse gas mitigation by agricultural intensification. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:12052–12057

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Daly HE (1992) Allocation, distribution, and scale: towards an economics that is efficient, just, and sustainable. Ecol Econ 6:185–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eliasch J (2008) Climate change: financing global forests. Eliasch Review. The Stationary Office, Crown

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2012) FAOSTAT (agriculture and food statistics). http://faostat.fao.org/default.aspx. Accessed 10 Mar 2012

  • Fearnside PM (2001) Saving forests as a global warming countermeasure: an issue that divides the environmental movement. Ecol Econ 39:167–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferraro PJ, Kiss A (2002) Ecology: direct payments to conserve biodiversity. Science 298:1718–1719

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer J, Batary P, Bawa KS et al (2011) Conservation: limits of land sparing. Science 334:593

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • FRA (2010) Global forest resource assessment 2010. FAO Forestry Paper 163, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerique Zipfel A (2010) Biodiversity as a resource: plant use and land use among the Shuar, Saraguros, and Mestizos in tropical rainforest areas of southern Ecuador. PhD Thesis, Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen

    Google Scholar 

  • Günter S, Gonzalez P, Álvarez G, Aguirre N, Palomeque X, Haubrich F, Weber M (2009) Determinants for successful reforestation of abandoned pastures in the Andes: soil conditions and vegetation cover. For Ecol Manage 258:81–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haber W (1990) Basic concepts of landscape ecology and their application in land management. Physiol Ecol Japan 27(special issue):131–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildebrandt P, Knoke T (2011) Investment decisions under uncertainty – a methodological review on forest science studies. For Policy Econ 13:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubacek K, van den Bergh JJM (2006) Changing concepts of ‘land’ in economic theory: from single to multi-disciplinary approaches. Ecol Econ 56:5–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knoke T, Huth A (2011) Modelling forest growth and finance: often disregarded tools in tropical land management. Tropical forestry, vol 8, Silviculture in the tropics, Part 3. Springer Berlin, pp 129–142. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-19986-8_11

  • Knoke T, Stimm B, Weber M (2008) Tropical farmers need productive alternatives. Nature 452:934

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Knoke T, Calvas B, Aguirre N, Román-Cuesta R, Günter S, Stimm B, Weber M, Mosandl R (2009a) Can tropical farmers reconcile subsistence needs with forest conservation? Front Ecol Environ 7:548–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knoke T, Weber M, Barkmann J, Pohle P, Calvas B, Medina C, Aguirre N, Günter S, Stimm B, Mosandl R, Walter F, Maza B, Gerique A (2009b) Effectiveness and distributional impacts of payments for reduced carbon emissions from deforestation. Erdkunde 63:365–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knoke T, Steinbeis O, Bösch M, Roman-Cuesta R, Burkhardt T (2011) Cost-effective compensation to avoid carbon emissions from forest loss: an approach to consider price-quantity effects and risk-aversion. Ecol Econ 70:1139–1153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koellner T, Schmitz OJ (2006) Biodiversity, ecosystem function, and investment risk. Bioscience 56:977–985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosandl R, Günter S, Stimm B, Weber M (2008) Ecuador suffers the highest deforestation rate in South America. In: Beck E, Bendix J, Kottke I, Makeschin F, Mosandl R (eds) Gradients in a tropical Mountain Ecosystem of Ecuador, vol 198, Ecological studies. Springer, Berlin, pp 37–40

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nair PKR, Gordon AM, Mosquera-Losada MR (2008) Agroforestry. In: Sven EJ, Brian F (eds) Encyclopedia of ecology. Academic, Oxford, pp 101–110

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Perfecto I, Vandermeer J (2010) The agroecological matrix as alternative to the landsparing/agriculture intensification model. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:5786–5791

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Phalan B, Onial M, Balmford A, Green RE (2011) Reconciling food production and biodiversity conservation: land sharing and land sparing compared. Science 333:1289–1291

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Torquebiau EF (2000) A renewed perspective on agroforestry concepts and classification. Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences – Series III – Sciences de la Vie 323, 1009–1017

    Google Scholar 

  • Torras M (2000) The total economic value of Amazonian deforestation, 1978–1993. Ecol Econ 33:283–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Werf W, Keesman K, Burgess P, Graves A, Pilbeam D, Incoll LD, Metselaar K, Mayus M, Stappers R, van Keulen H, Palma J, Dupraz C (2007) Yield-SAFE: a parameter-sparse, process-based dynamic model for predicting resource capture, growth, and production in agroforestry systems. Ecol Eng 29:419–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walter C, Stützel H (2009) A new method for assessing the sustainability of land-use systems (II): evaluating impact indicators. Ecol Econ 68:1288–1300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wise M, Calvin K, Thomson A, Clarke L, Bond-Lamberty B, Sands R, Smith SJ, Janetos A, Edmonds J (2009) Implications of limiting CO2 concentrations for land use and energy. Science 324:1183–1186

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wunder S, Engel S, Pagiola S (2008) Taking stock: a comparative analysis of payments for environmental services programs in developed and developing countries. Ecol Econ 65:834–852

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Baltazar Calvas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Calvas, B. et al. (2013). Sustainable Agriculture and Conservation Payments Are Key Factors in Mitigating Tropical Forest Loss. In: Bendix, J., et al. Ecosystem Services, Biodiversity and Environmental Change in a Tropical Mountain Ecosystem of South Ecuador. Ecological Studies, vol 221. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38137-9_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics