Skip to main content

ISAKOS Classification System for Rotator Cuff Tears

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Shoulder Concepts 2013: Consensus and Concerns

Abstract

Many classification systems have been used to describe rotator cuff tears in the worldwide orthopaedic literature. However, there is not one current standard classification that includes all the types of rotator cuff tears, describes its key characteristics or is universally utilized.

ISAKOS Upper Extremity and Anthroscopy Committee: Emilio Calvo, Kevin Shea, Benno Ejnisman, Guillermo Arce, W. Ben Kibler, Felix Savoie III, Alberto Pochini, Eiji Itoi, Hiroyuki Sugaya, Giovanni Di Giacomo, Yon Sik Yoo, Dan Guttmann, Tom Ludvigsen, Augustus Mazzocca, Gregory Bain, John Uribe, Matthew Provencher, Jaap Willems, Francisco Vergara

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. DeOrio JK, Cofield RH (1984) Results of a second attempt at surgical repair of a failed initial rotator cuff repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am 66:563–567

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Harryman DT, Mack LA, Wang K, Jackins SE, Richardson ML, Matsen FA (1991) Repairs of the rotator cuff. Correlation of functional results with integrity of the cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Am 73:982–989

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gerber C, Fuchs B, Hodler J (2000) The results of repair of massive tears of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82:505–515

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Snyder SJ (2003) Arthroscopic classification of rotator cuff lesions and surgical decision-making. In: Snyder SJ (ed) Shoulder Arthroscopy. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 201–207

    Google Scholar 

  5. Weber SC (1999) Arthroscopic debridement and acromioplasty versus mini-open repair in the treatment of significant partial-thickness rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy 15:126–131

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sano H, Wakabayashi I, Itoi E (2006) Stress distribution in the supraspinatus tendon with partial-thickness tears: an analysis using two-dimensional finite element model. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 15:100–105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lafosse L, Jost B, Reiland Y, Audebert S, Toussaint B, Gobezie R (2007) Structural integrity and clinical outcomes after arthroscopic repair of isolated subscapularis tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:1184–1193

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Davidson J, Burkhart SS (2010) The geometric classification of rotator cuff tears: a system linking tear pattern to treatment and prognosis. Arthroscopy 26:417–424

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ellman H (1990) Diagnosis and treatment of incomplete rotator cuff tears. Clin Orthop Relat Res 254:64–74

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Oh JH, Kim SH, Ji HM, Jo KH, Bin SW, Gong HS (2009) Prognostic factors affecting anatomic outcome of rotator cuff repair and correlation with functional outcome. Arthroscopy 25:30–39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Goutallier D, Postel JM, Bernageau J, Lavau L, Voisin MC (1994) Fatty muscle degeneration in cuff ruptures. Pre- and postoperative evaluation by CT scan. Clin Orthop Relat Res 304:78–83

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fuchs B, Weishaupt D, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Gerber C (1999) Fatty degeneration of the muscles of the rotator cuff: assessment by computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 8:599–605

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. McCarron JA, Derwin KA, Bey MJ, Polster JM, Schils JP, Ricchetti ET, Iannotti JP (2012) Failure with continuity in rotator cuff repair “healing”. Am J Sports Med (Epub ahead of print)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lippe J, Spang JT, Leger RR, Arciero RA, Mazzocca AD, Shea KP (2012) Inter-rater agreement of the Goutallier, Patte, and Warner classification scores using preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in patients with rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy 28:154–159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Patte D (1990) Classification of rotator cuff lesions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 254:81–86

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emilio Calvo and the ISAKOS Upper Extremity and Anthroscopy Committees .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 ISAKOS

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Calvo and the ISAKOS Upper Extremity and Anthroscopy Committees, E. (2013). ISAKOS Classification System for Rotator Cuff Tears. In: Arce, G., et al. Shoulder Concepts 2013: Consensus and Concerns. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38097-6_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38097-6_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-38096-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-38097-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics