Abstract
Many classification systems have been used to describe rotator cuff tears in the worldwide orthopaedic literature. However, there is not one current standard classification that includes all the types of rotator cuff tears, describes its key characteristics or is universally utilized.
ISAKOS Upper Extremity and Anthroscopy Committee: Emilio Calvo, Kevin Shea, Benno Ejnisman, Guillermo Arce, W. Ben Kibler, Felix Savoie III, Alberto Pochini, Eiji Itoi, Hiroyuki Sugaya, Giovanni Di Giacomo, Yon Sik Yoo, Dan Guttmann, Tom Ludvigsen, Augustus Mazzocca, Gregory Bain, John Uribe, Matthew Provencher, Jaap Willems, Francisco Vergara
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
DeOrio JK, Cofield RH (1984) Results of a second attempt at surgical repair of a failed initial rotator cuff repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am 66:563–567
Harryman DT, Mack LA, Wang K, Jackins SE, Richardson ML, Matsen FA (1991) Repairs of the rotator cuff. Correlation of functional results with integrity of the cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Am 73:982–989
Gerber C, Fuchs B, Hodler J (2000) The results of repair of massive tears of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82:505–515
Snyder SJ (2003) Arthroscopic classification of rotator cuff lesions and surgical decision-making. In: Snyder SJ (ed) Shoulder Arthroscopy. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 201–207
Weber SC (1999) Arthroscopic debridement and acromioplasty versus mini-open repair in the treatment of significant partial-thickness rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy 15:126–131
Sano H, Wakabayashi I, Itoi E (2006) Stress distribution in the supraspinatus tendon with partial-thickness tears: an analysis using two-dimensional finite element model. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 15:100–105
Lafosse L, Jost B, Reiland Y, Audebert S, Toussaint B, Gobezie R (2007) Structural integrity and clinical outcomes after arthroscopic repair of isolated subscapularis tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:1184–1193
Davidson J, Burkhart SS (2010) The geometric classification of rotator cuff tears: a system linking tear pattern to treatment and prognosis. Arthroscopy 26:417–424
Ellman H (1990) Diagnosis and treatment of incomplete rotator cuff tears. Clin Orthop Relat Res 254:64–74
Oh JH, Kim SH, Ji HM, Jo KH, Bin SW, Gong HS (2009) Prognostic factors affecting anatomic outcome of rotator cuff repair and correlation with functional outcome. Arthroscopy 25:30–39
Goutallier D, Postel JM, Bernageau J, Lavau L, Voisin MC (1994) Fatty muscle degeneration in cuff ruptures. Pre- and postoperative evaluation by CT scan. Clin Orthop Relat Res 304:78–83
Fuchs B, Weishaupt D, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Gerber C (1999) Fatty degeneration of the muscles of the rotator cuff: assessment by computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 8:599–605
McCarron JA, Derwin KA, Bey MJ, Polster JM, Schils JP, Ricchetti ET, Iannotti JP (2012) Failure with continuity in rotator cuff repair “healing”. Am J Sports Med (Epub ahead of print)
Lippe J, Spang JT, Leger RR, Arciero RA, Mazzocca AD, Shea KP (2012) Inter-rater agreement of the Goutallier, Patte, and Warner classification scores using preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in patients with rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy 28:154–159
Patte D (1990) Classification of rotator cuff lesions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 254:81–86
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 ISAKOS
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Calvo and the ISAKOS Upper Extremity and Anthroscopy Committees, E. (2013). ISAKOS Classification System for Rotator Cuff Tears. In: Arce, G., et al. Shoulder Concepts 2013: Consensus and Concerns. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38097-6_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38097-6_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-38096-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-38097-6
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)