Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Arthroscopy and Repair

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Shoulder Concepts 2013: Consensus and Concerns

  • 2103 Accesses

Abstract

The current literature regarding classification appears to be underpowered for valid conclusions. The comprehensive ISAKOS Rotator Cuff Disease Classification System previously presented at this book will be helpful for research and daily practice guidelines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. AAOS (2010) Clinical practice guideline on optimizing the management of rotator cuff problems. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Rosemont

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baums MH, Buchhorn GH, Spahn G, Poppendieck B, Schultz W, Klinger HM (2008) Biomechanical characteristics of single-row repair in comparison to double-row repair with consideration of the suture configuration and suture material. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16:1052–1060

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Burks RT, Crim J, Brown N, Fink B, Greis PE (2009) A prospective randomized clinical trial comparing arthroscopic single- and double-row rotator cuff repair: magnetic resonance imaging and early clinical evaluation. Am J Sports Med 37:674–682

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cho NS, Yi JW, Lee BG, Rhee YG (2010) Retear patterns after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: single-row versus suture bridge technique. Am J Sports Med 38:664–671

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Coghlan JA, Buchbinder R, Green S, Johnston RV, Bell SN (2008) Surgery for rotator cuff disease. [Review] [64 refs]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD005619

    Google Scholar 

  6. Duquin TR, Buyea C, Bisson LJ (2010) Which method of rotator cuff repair leads to the highest rate of structural healing? A systematic review. [Review] [39 refs]. Am J Sports Med 38(4):835–841

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Franceschi F, Ruzzini L, Longo UG, Martina FM, Zobel BB, Maffulli N et al (2007) Equivalent clinical results of arthroscopic single-row and double-row suture anchor repair for rotator cuff tears: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Sports Med 35:1254–1260

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Grasso A, Milano G, Salvatore M, Falcone G, Deriu L, Fabbriciani C (2009) Single-row versus double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a prospective randomized clinical study. Arthroscopy 25:4–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lorbach O, Bachelier F, Vees J, Kohn D, Pape D (2008) Cyclic loading of rotator cuff reconstructions: single-row repair with modified suture configurations versus double-row repair. Am J Sports Med 36:1504–1510

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Morse K, Davis AD, Afra R, Kaye EK, Schepsis A, Voloshin I (2008) Arthroscopic versus mini-open rotator cuff repair: a comprehensive review and meta-analysis. [Review] [40 refs]. Am J Sports Med 36(9):1824–1828

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nho SJ, Slabaugh MA, Seroyer ST, Grumet RC, Wilson JB, Verma NN et al (2009) Does the literature support double-row suture anchor fixation for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair? A systematic review comparing double-row and single-row suture anchor configuration. [Review] [45 refs]. Arthroscopy 25(11):1319–1328

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ozbaydar M, Elhassan B, Esenyel C, Atalar A, Bozdag E, Sunbuloglu E et al (2008) A comparison of single-versus double-row suture anchor techniques in a simulated repair of the rotator cuff: an experimental study in rabbits. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90:1386–1391

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Prasathaporn N, Kuptniratsaikul S, Kongrukgreatiyos K (2011) Single-row repair versus double-row repair of full-thickness rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy 27:978–985

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Saridakis P, Jones G (2010) Outcomes of single-row and double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a systematic review. [Review] [31 refs]. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92(3):732–742

    Google Scholar 

  15. Seida JC, LeBlanc C, Schouten JR, Mousavi SS, Hartling L, Vandermeer B et al (2010) Systematic review: nonoperative and operative treatments for rotator cuff tears. [Review] [81 refs]. Ann Intern Med 153(4):246–255

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Straus EJ, Salata MJ, Kercher J, Barker JU, McGill K, Bach BR, Romeo AA, Verma NN (2011) The arthroscopic management of partial-thickness rotator cuff tears: a systematic review of the literature. Arthroscopy 27(4):568–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Trantalis JN, Boorman RS, Pletsch K, Lo IK (2008) Medial rotator cuff failure after arthroscopic double-row rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy 24:727–731

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Voigt C, Bosse C, Vosshenrich R, Schulz AP, Lill H (2010) Arthroscopic supraspinatus tendon repair with suture-bridging technique: functional outcome and magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Sports Med 38:983–991

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yamakado K, Katsuo S, Mizuno K, Arakawa H, Hayashi S (2010) Medial-row failure after arthroscopic double-row rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy 26:430–435

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ball C, Galatz LM, Yamaguchi K (2001) Tenodesis or tenotomy of the biceps tendon: why and when to do it. Tech Shoulder Elbow Surg 2:140–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Boileau P, Neyton L (2005) Arthroscopic tenodesis for the long head of the biceps. Oper Orthop Traumatol 17(6):601–623

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hsu A, Ghodadra N, Provencher M, Lewis P, Bach B (2011) Biceps tenotomy versus tenodesis: a review of clinical outcomes and biomechanical results. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 20:326–332

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mariani PP, Bellelli A, Botticella C (1997) Arthroscopic absence of the long head of the biceps tendon. Arthroscopy 13:499–501

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Mazzocca AD, Bicos J, Santangelo S, Romeo AA, Arciero RA (2005) The biomechanical evaluation of four fixation techniques for proximal biceps tenodesis. Arthroscopy 21(11):1296–1306

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sanders B, Lavery K, Pennington S, Warner JJP (2008) Biceps tendon tenodesis: success with proximal versus distal fixation. Arthroscopy 24(6):e9

    Google Scholar 

  26. Slenker N, Lawson K, Cicciotti M, Dodson C, Cohen S (2012) Biceps tenotomy versus tenodesis. Clinical outcomes. Arthroscopy 28(4):576–582

    Google Scholar 

  27. Walch G, Nové-Josserand L, Boileau P, Levigne C (1998) Subluxations and dislocations of the tendon of the long head biceps. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 7:100–108

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Wolf RS, Zheng N, Weichel D (2005) Long head biceps tenotomy versus tenodesis: a cadaveric biomechanical analysis. Arthroscopy 21:182–185

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bennet W (2004) Arthroscopic bicipital sheath repair: two-year follow-up with pulley lesions. Arthroscopy 20:964–973

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Hoflaan 22, 1861 CR, Bergen, Netherlands

    Jaap Willems

  2. Taos Orthopaedic Institute, 1219-A Gusdorf Road, Taos, NM, 87571, USA

    Dan Guttmann

  3. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Instituto Argentino de Diagnóstico y Tratamiento, Buenos Aires, Argentina

    Guillermo Arce

  4. Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia

    Greg Bain

Authors
  1. Jaap Willems
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dan Guttmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Guillermo Arce
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Greg Bain
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jaap Willems .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. de Diagnóstico y Tratamiento, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Instituto Argentino, Marcelo T. de Alvear 2400, Buenos Aires, 1122, Argentina

    Guillermo Arce

  2. Parkens Private Hospital, Oestre Alle 42, 3rd, Copenhagen, 2100, Denmark

    Klaus Bak

  3. Health Center, University of Connecticut, Farmington Avenue 263, Farmington, 06034-4037, Connecticut, USA

    Kevin P Shea

  4. School of Medicine, Tulane University, Tulane Avenue, SL32 1430, New Orleans, 70112, Louisiana, USA

    Felix Savoie III

  5. Shoulder Center of Kentucky, Market St. 240, Lexington, 40507, Kentucky, USA

    William Benjamin Kibler

  6. , Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Seiryo-Machi, Aoba-Ku 1-1, Sendai, 980-8574, Miyagi, Japan

    Eiji Itoi

  7. Health Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Connecticut, Farmington Avenue 263, Farmington, 06034, Connecticut, USA

    Augustus D. Mazzocca

  8. Health Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Connecticut, Farmington Avenue 263, Farmington, 06034, Connecticut, USA

    Knut Beitzel

  9. Reconstruction Surgery Unit, Dept. of Orthopedic Surgery, Shoulder and Elbow, Valle de la Fuenfria 10, Madrid, 28034, Spain

    Emilio Calvo

  10. CETE-UNIFESP-EPM, Rua Vanderley 466AP 232, São Paulo, 5011001, São Paulo, Brazil

    Benno Ejnisman

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 ISAKOS

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Willems, J., Guttmann, D., Arce, G., Bain, G. (2013). Arthroscopy and Repair. In: Arce, G., et al. Shoulder Concepts 2013: Consensus and Concerns. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38097-6_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38097-6_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-38096-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-38097-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation