Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Sustainability and Human Resource Management pp 205–223Cite as

A Stakeholder Perspective for Sustainable HRM

Literature Review and a Research Agenda

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance ((CSEG))

Abstract

Sustainability and stakeholder theory and management are two interrelated topics, because stakeholder’s claims impact on the social, environmental, and economic performances of the organization. Indeed, a cooperative relation between the company and its stakeholders can trigger the development of the company sustainability. Within this perspective, the chapter explores Sustainable HRM from a stakeholder perspective. As a result, some knowledge gaps are highlighted and a research agenda composed of theoretical, managerial and methodological dimensions is advanced and discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bakan J (2004) The corporation: the pathological pursuit of profit and power. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura A, Caprara G, Zsolnai L (2002) Corporate transgressions. In: Zsolnai L (ed) Ethics in the economy. Handbook of business ethics. Lang, Oxford, pp 151–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker UC (2012) Sustainability ethics and sustainability research. Springer, Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Beer M, Spector B, Lawrence PR, Mills DQ, Walton RE (1984) Managing human assets. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Boselie P, Dietz G, Boon C (2005) Commonalities and contradictions in HRM and performance research. Hum Resour Manage J 15(3):67–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boudreau JW, Ramstad PM (2005) Talentship, talent segmentation and sustainability: a new HR decision science paradigm for a new strategy definition. Hum Resour Manage 44(2):129–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll AB (1989) Business and society. Ethics and stakeholder management. South-Western Publishing, Cincinnati

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll AB (1991) The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Bus Horizons 34:39–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll A, Buchholtz AK (2011) Business & society, 8th edn. South-Western Cengage Learning, Mason, Ohio, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifton D, Amran A (2010) The stakeholder approach: a sustainability perspective. J Bus Ethics 98:121–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colakoglu S, Lepak DP, Hong Y (2006) Measuring HRM effectiveness: considering multiple stakeholders in a global context. Hum Resour Manage Rev 16(2):209–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daily BF, Huang S (2001) Achieving sustainability through attention to human resource factors in environmental management. Int J Operat Prod Manage 21(12):1539–1552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davenport K (2000) Corporate citizenship: a stakeholder approach for defining corporate social performance and identifying measures for assessing it. Bus Soc 39(2):210–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Docherty P, Forslin J, Shani AB (Rami) (eds) (2002a) Creating sustainable work systems: emerging perspectives and practice. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Docherty P, Forslin J, Shani AB (Rami), Kira M (2002b) Emerging work systems: from intensive to sustainable. In: Docherty P, Forslin J, Shani AB (Rami) (eds) Creating sustainable work systems: emerging perspectives and practice. Routledge, London, pp 3–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Docherty P, Kira M, Shani AB (Rami) (eds) (2008) Creating sustainable work systems: developing social sustainability, 2nd edn. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson T, Preston LE (1995) The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence, and implications. Acad Manage Rev 20(1):65–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Driscoll C, Starik M (2004) The primordial stakeholder: advancing the conceptual consideration of stakeholder status for the natural environment. J Bus Ethics 49(1):55–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyllick T, Hockerts K (2002) Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Bus Strateg Environ 11(2):130–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehnert I (2009) Sustainable human resource management: a conceptual and exploratory analysis from a paradox perspective, Contributions to management science series. Physica/Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad Manage Rev 14(4):532–550

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkington J (1998) Cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of the 21st century business. New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island/Stony Creek

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrary M (2009) A stakeholder’s perspective on human resource management. J Bus Ethics 87:31–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Figge F, Hahn T, Schaltegger S, Wagner M (2002) The sustainability balanced scorecard – linking sustainability management to business strategy. Bus Strateg Environ 11(5):269–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraederick J, Ferrell OC (2012) Business ethics: ethical decision making and cases. South-Western College Publishing, Mason

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederick WC, Davis K, Post JE (1988) Business and society. Corporate strategy, public policy, ethics. McGraw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman RE (1984) Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Pitman, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant RM (2002) Contemporary strategy analysis. Concepts, techniques, applications, 4th edn. Oxford, Blackwell

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood MR (2002) Ethics and HRM: a review and conceptual analysis. J Bus Ethics 36(3):261–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood M, Cieri H (2007) Stakeholder theory and the ethics of HRM. In: Pinnington AH, Macklin R, Campbell T (eds) Human resource management. Ethics and employment. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 119–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerci M, Vinante M (2011) Training evaluation: an analysis of the stakeholders’ evaluation needs. J Eur Ind Train 35(4):385–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerci M, Bartezzaghi E, Solari L (2010) Training evaluation in Italian corporate universities: a stakeholder-based analysis. Int J Hum Resour Dev 14(4):291–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Guest DE (2011) Human resource management and performance: still searching for some answers. Hum Resour Manage J 21(1):3–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hertz N (2001) The silent takeover: global capitalism and the death of democracy. Heinemann, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitt M, Ireland D, Hoskisson R (2005) Strategic management: competitiveness and globalization: concepts, 6th edn. Thompson/Southwestern, Mason

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS (2001) Understanding the complexity of economic. Ecol Soc Syst Ecosyst 4:390–405

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosseini CJ, Brenner SN (1992) The stakeholder theory of the firm: a methodology to generate value matrix weight. Bus Ethics Q 2(2):99–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson SE, Schuler RS (2003) Managing human resources through strategic partnerships, 8th edn. South-Western, Cincinnati

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen MC (2001) Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. J Appl Corp Finance 14(3):8–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones TM, Felps W, Bigley GA (2007) Ethical theory and stakeholder-related decisions: the role of stakeholder culture. Acad Manage Rev 32(1):137–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kira M (2002) Moving from consuming to regenerative work. In: Docherty P, Forslin J, Shani AB (Rami) (eds) Creating sustainable work systems: emerging perspectives and practice. Routledge, London, pp 29–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick DL (1998) Evaluating training programs: the four levels. Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein N (2000) No logo: taking aim at the brand bullies. Knopf–Random, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Konrad A, Steurer R, Langer ME, Martinuzzi A (2006) Empirical findings on business – society relations in Europe. J Bus Ethics 63:89–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michalski GV, Cousins JB (2000) Differences in stakeholder perceptions about training evaluation: a concept mapping/pattern matching investigation. Eval Program Plann 23:211–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michalski GV, Cousins JB (2001) Multiple perspectives on training evaluation: probing stakeholder perceptions in a global network development firm. Am J Eval 22(1):37–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills RW, Weinstein B (2000) Beyond shareholder value – reconciling the shareholder and stakeholder perspectives. J Gen Manage 25(3):79–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell RK, Agle BR, Wood DJ (1997) Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts. Acad Manage Rev 42(5):507–525

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohrman S, (Rami) Shani AB (eds) (2011) Research in organizing for sustainability, vol 1. Emerald Publications, Bingley

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickols FW (2005) Why a stakeholder approach to evaluation training. Adv Dev Hum Resour 7(1):121–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paauwe J, Boselie P (2005) HRM and performance: what next? Hum Resour Manage J 15:68–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parbotteah BB, Cullen JB (2012) Business ethics. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasmore WA. Stymne B, Shani AB (Rami), Mohrman SA, Adler N (2008) The promise of collaborative management research. In: Shani AB (Rami), Mohrman SA, Pasmore WA, Stymne B, Adler N (eds) Handbook of collaborative management research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 7–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips JJ (1996) ROI: the search for best practices. Train Dev 50:42–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Post JE, Preston LE, Sachs S (2002) Managing the extended enterprise: the new stakeholder view. Calif Manage Rev 45(1):6–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preble JF (2005) Toward a comprehensive model of stakeholder management. Bus Soc Rev 110(4):421–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramus CA, Steger U (2000) The roles of supervisory support behaviors and environmental policy in employee “ecoinitiatives” at leading-edge European companies. Acad Manage J 43(4):605–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • (Rami) Shani AB, Mohrman S (2011) Organizing for sustainable effectiveness: reprise and way forward. In: Mohrman S, (Rami) Shani AB (eds) Research in organizing for sustainability, vol 1. Emerald Publications, Bingley, pp 215–238

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport A (1986) Creating shareholder value. The new standard for business performance. New York, Free Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds SJ, Schultz FC, Hekman DR (2006) Stakeholder theory and managerial decision-making: constraints and implications of balancing stakeholder interests. J Bus Ethics 64(3):285–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savage GT, Nix WT, Whitehead CJ, Blair JD (1991) Strategies for assessing and managing organization stakeholders. Acad Manage Exec 5(2):61–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Seitanidi MM, Koufopoulos DN, Palmer P (2010) Partnership formation for change: indicators for transformative potential in cross sector social partnerships. J Bus Ethics 94:139–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons JA (2003) Balancing performance, accountability and equity in stakeholder relationships: towards more socially responsible HR practice. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manage 10(3):129–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith NC (2003) Corporate social responsibility: whether or how? Calif Manage Rev 45(4):52–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steurer R, Langer ME, Konrad A, Martinuzzi A (2005) Corporations, stakeholders and sustainable development. I: A theoretical exploration of business–society relations. J Bus Ethics 61:263–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich D, Brockbank W (2005) The HR value proposition. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickers MR (2005) Business ethics and the HR role: past, present, and future. Hum Resour Plann 28(1):26–32

    Google Scholar 

  • WCED (1987) Our common future. World Commission on Environment and Development. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler D, Sillanpaa N (1997) The stakeholder corporation: a blueprint for maximizing stakeholder value. Pitman Publishing, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler D, Colbert B, Freeman E (2003) Focusing on value: reconciling corporate social responsibility, sustainability, and stakeholder approach in a network world. J Gen Manage 28(3):1–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Worley CG, Lawler E III (2010) Built to change organizations and responsible progress: twin pillars of sustainable success. In: Pasmore WA, Shani AB, Woodman RW (eds) Research in organizational change and development. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publications, vol 18, pp 1–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright PM, McMahan GC (1992) Theoretical perspectives for strategic human resource management. J Manage 18(2):295–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Social and Political Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy

    Marco Guerci (Assistant Professor in Organization and Human Resources)

  2. Department of Management, Economics and Industrial Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy

    Marco Guerci (Assistant Professor in Organization and Human Resources)

  3. Orfalea College of Business, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, USA

    Abraham B. (Rami) Shani (Professor of Management, Research Professor) & Luca Solari (Full Professor of Organization theory, Resource Management and Change)

  4. School of Management, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy

    Abraham B. (Rami) Shani (Professor of Management, Research Professor)

  5. University of Milan, Milan, Italy

    Luca Solari (Full Professor of Organization theory, Resource Management and Change)

Authors
  1. Marco Guerci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Abraham B. (Rami) Shani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Luca Solari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Guerci .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. , Louvain School of Management, Université Catholique de Louvain, Place des Doyens 1, Louvain-la-Neuve, 1348, Waals Brabant, Belgium

    Ina Ehnert

  2. , Cass Business School, University of Chester, Picts Lane 21, Princes Risborough, HP27 9DX, United Kingdom

    Wes Harry

  3. University of Kaiserslautern, Gottlieb-Daimler-Straße, Kaiserslautern, 67663, Germany

    Klaus J. Zink

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Guerci, M., Shani, A.B.(., Solari, L. (2014). A Stakeholder Perspective for Sustainable HRM. In: Ehnert, I., Harry, W., Zink, K. (eds) Sustainability and Human Resource Management. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37524-8_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation