Skip to main content

Comparison of Models for Recognition of Old Slavic Letters

  • Conference paper
ICT Innovations 2012 (ICT Innovations 2012)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 207))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper compares two methods for classification of Old Slavic letters. Traditional letter recognition programs cannot be applied on the Old Slavic Cyrillic manuscripts because these letters have unique characteristics. The first classification method is based on a decision tree and the second one uses fuzzy techniques. Both methods use the same set of features extracted from the letter bitmaps. Results from the conducted research reveal that discriminative features for recognition of Church Slavic Letters are number and position of spots in the outer segments, presence and position of vertical and horizontal lines, compactness and symmetry. The efficiency of the implemented classifiers is tested experimentally.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Scripta & e-Scripta. The Journal of Interdisciplinary Mediaeval Studies, vol. 6. Institute of Literature, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences. “Boyan Penev” Publishing Center (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mori, S., Suen, C.Y., Yamamoto, K.: Historical Review of OCR Research and Development. Proceedings of the IEEE 80, 1029–1058 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Vinciarelli, A.: A Survey on Off-line Cursive Word Recognition. Pattern Recognition 35, 1433–1446 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Kavallieratou, E., Fakotakis, N., Kokkinakis, G.: Handwritten Character Recognition Based on Structural Characteristics. In: 16th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, pp. 139–142 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Malaviya, A., Peters, L.: Fuzzy Handwriting Description Language: FOHDEL. Pattern Recognition 33, 119–131 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Eastwood, B., Jennings, A., Harvey, A.: A Feature Based Neural Network Segmenter for Handwritten Words. In: International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Multimedia Applications (ICCIMA 1997), Australia, pp. 286–290 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ntzios, K., Gatos, B., Pratikakis, I., Perantonis, S.J.: An Old Greek Handwritten OCR System based on an Efficient Segmentation-free Approach. Int. Journal on Document Analysis and Recognition 9(2), 179–192 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen, C.H., Curtins, J.: Word Recognition in a Segmentation-free Approach to OCR. In: Second International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR 1993), pp. 573–576 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Antic, V.: Macedonian Medieval Literature. Institute for Macedonian Literature. Skopje, Macedonia (1997) (in Macedonian)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Atanasova, S.: Linguistic Analysis of Bitola’s Liturgical Book, Institute of Macedonian Language - Skopje, Macedonia (1990) (in Macedonian)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Velev, I., Makarijoska, L., Crvenkovska, E.: Macedonian Monuments with Glagolitic and Cyrillic Handwriting, Stip, Macedonia (August 2, 2008) (in Macedonian)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Russian Review of Cyrillic Manuscripts, http://xlt.narod.ru/pg/alpha.html

  13. Klekovska, M., Nedelkovski, I., Stojcevska-Antic, V., Mihajlov, D.: Automatic Letter Style Recognition of Church Slavic Manuscripts. In: Proc. of 44th Int. Scientific Conf. on Information, Communication and Energy Systems and Technologies, Veliko Tarnovo, Bulgaria, pp. 221–224 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cheriet, M., Kharma, N., Liu, C.L., Suen, C.Y.: Character Recognition Systems, A Guide for Students and Practioners. John Wiley and Sons, New Jersey (2007)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Martinovska, C., Nedelkovski, I., Klekovska, M., Kaevski, D.: Fuzzy Classifier for Church Slavic Handwritten Characters. In: Proc. of 14th Int. Conf. on Enterprise Information Systems, Wroclaw, Poland, pp. 310–313 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Yager, R.: On the Representation of Multi-Agent Aggregation using Fuzzy Logic. Cybernetics and Systems 21, 575–590 (1990)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Martinovska, C., Nedelkovski, I., Klekovska, M., Kaevski, D.: Recognition of Old Cyrillic Slavic Letters: Decion Tree versus Fuzzy Classifier Experiments. In: Yager, R.R., Sgurev, V., Hadjiski, M. (eds.) Proc. 6th IEEE Int. Conf. on Intelligent Systems 2012, Sofia, Bulgaria, vol. I, pp. 48–53 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mimoza Klekovska .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Klekovska, M., Martinovska, C., Nedelkovski, I., Kaevski, D. (2013). Comparison of Models for Recognition of Old Slavic Letters. In: Markovski, S., Gusev, M. (eds) ICT Innovations 2012. ICT Innovations 2012. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 207. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37169-1_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37169-1_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-37168-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-37169-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics