Skip to main content

Personalizing Triggers for Charity Actions

  • Conference paper
Persuasive Technology (PERSUASIVE 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 7822))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this paper we investigate whether there is scope for personalizing triggers in the domain of charitable action. The first of our two studies focuses on actions promoting human rights (via Amnesty International). While participants in a previous exploratory study had indicated that victim attributes (such as gender, religion, and ethnicity) would not matter at all, we found when observing participants’ actions that in fact these attributes mattered greatly. Participants tended to select victim attributes similar to their own, showing a clear potential for personalization. These findings were corroborated by a further study in the area of charitable giving (using the KIVA micro-financing website). The paper also discusses implications for digital behavior intervention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Byrne, D.: Attitudes and attraction. In: Berkowitz, L. (ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 4, Academic Press, New York (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Byrne, D.: The attraction paradigm. Academic Press, New York (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Carenini, G., Moore, D.J.: An empirical study of the influence of user tailoring on evaluative argument effectiveness. In: IJCAI, pp. 1307–1314 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fogg, B.J.: Persuasive technology: using computers to change what we think and do. Morgan Kaufmann (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fogg, B.J.: Creating persuasive technologies: an eight-step design process. In: Persuasive Technology Conference, Claremont, California. ACM (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Grasso, F., Cawsey, A., Jones, R.: Dialectical argumentation to solve conflicts in advice giving: a case study in the promotion of healthy nutrition. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 53, 1077–1115 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. IJsselsteijn, W., de Kort, Y., Midden, C., Eggen, B., van den Hoven, E.: Persuasive Technology for Human Well-Being: Setting the Scene. In: IJsselsteijn, W.A., de Kort, Y.A.W., Midden, C., Eggen, B., van den Hoven, E. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2006. LNCS, vol. 3962, pp. 1–5. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Jackson, T.: Motivating sustainable consumption: A review of models of consumer behaviour and behavioural change. A Report to the Sustainable Development Research Network. Policy Studies Institute, London (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Japuntich, S., Zehner, M., Smith, S., Jorenby, D., Valdez, J., Fiore, M., Baker, T., Gustafson, D.: Smoking cessation via the internet: a randomized clinical trial of an internet intervention as adjuvant treatment in a smoking cessation intervention. Nicotine and Tobacco Research 8 (suppl. 1), S59–S67 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kroeze, W., Werkman, A., Brug, J.: A systematic review of randomized trials on the effectiveness of computer-tailored education on physical activity and dietary behaviours. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 31, 205–223 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mazzotta, I., de Rosis, F., Carofiglio, V.: PORTIA: a user-adapted persuasion system in the healthy eating domain. IEEE Intelligent Systems 22, 42–51 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Michie, S., Johnston, M., Francis, J., Hardeman, W., Eccles, M.: From theory to intervention: mapping theoretically derived behavioural determinants to behaviour change techniques. Applied Psychology: An International Review 57, 660–680 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Midden, C., Ham, J.: Using negative and positive social feedback from a robotic agent to save energy. In: Persuasive Technology Conference, Claremont, CA. ACM (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nguyen, H., Masthoff, J.: Designing empathic computers: The effect of multimodal empathic feedback using animated agent. In: Persuasive Technology, Claremont, CA. ACM (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Noar, S.M., Benac, C.N., Harris, M.S.: Does tailoring matter? Meta-analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions. Psych. Bulletin 133, 673–693 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Noar, S.M., Harrington, N.G., Aldrich, R.S.: The role of message tailoring in the development of persuasive health communication messages. In: Beck, C. (ed.) Communication Yearbook 33, pp. 73–133. Routledge (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  17. O’Keefe, D.J.: Persuasion: Theory and research. Sage, Newbury Park (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Reiter, E., Robertson, R., Osman, L.: Lessons from a failure: Generating tailored smoking cessation letters. Artificial Intelligence 144, 41–58 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Revere, D., Dunbar, P.J.: Review of computer-generated outpatient health behaviour interventions: Clinical encounters “in absentia”. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 8, 62–79 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Langrial, S., Oinas-Kukkonen, H.: Less Fizzy Drinks: A Multi-method Study of Persuasive Reminders. In: Bang, M., Ragnemalm, E.L. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2012. LNCS, vol. 7284, pp. 256–261. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Forbes, P.J., Wells, S., Masthoff, J., Nguyen, H.: SUPERHUB: Integrating behaviour change theories into a sustainable urban-mobility platform. In: Using Technology to Facilitate Behaviour Change and Support Healthy, Sustainable Living Workshop at BHCI (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Nguyen, H., Masthoff, J.: Is it Me or Is it what I say? Source Image and Persuasion. In: de Kort, Y.A.W., IJsselsteijn, W.A., Midden, C., Eggen, B., Fogg, B.J. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2007. LNCS, vol. 4744, pp. 231–242. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Oinas-Kukkonen, H.: A foundation for the study of behavior change support systems. Persuasive Ubiquitous Computing, 1–13 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Nguyen, H., Masthoff, J.: Mary: A personalised virtual health trainer. Adjunct Proceedings of UMAP 2010, pp. 58–60 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Grasso, F., Ham, J., Masthoff, J.: User Models for Motivational Systems. In: Ardissono, L., Kuflik, T. (eds.) UMAP Workshops 2011. LNCS, vol. 7138, pp. 335–341. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Masthoff, J., Langrial, S., van Deemter, K. (2013). Personalizing Triggers for Charity Actions. In: Berkovsky, S., Freyne, J. (eds) Persuasive Technology. PERSUASIVE 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7822. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37157-8_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37157-8_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-37156-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-37157-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics