Skip to main content

Agent-Based Simulation Analysis for Equilibrium Selection and Coordination Failure in Coordination Games Characterized by the Minimum Strategy

  • Chapter
Transactions on Computational Collective Intelligence IX

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((TCCI,volume 7770))

Abstract

In order to analyze equilibrium selection and coordination failure in coordination games, we develop an agent-based simulation system in which artificial adaptive agents have a decision making and learning mechanism based on neural networks and genetic algorithms. Using this simulation system, we examine the strategy choices of agents and formation of equilibria in a steady state, and compare our simulation result with the experimental result given by Van Huyck et al. (1990).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Axelrod, R.: Advancing the art of simulation in the social sciences. In: Conte, R., Hegselmann, R., Terna, R. (eds.) Simulating Social Phenomena, pp. 21–40. Springer (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreoni, J., Miller, J.H.: Auctions with artificial adaptive agents. Games and Economic Behavior 10, 39–64 (1995)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Banerje, B., Sen, S.: Selecting parters. In: Parsons, S., Gmytrasiewicz, P., Wooldridge, M. (eds.) Game Theory and Decision Theory in Agent-Based Systems, pp. 27–42. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Battalio, R., Samuelson, L., Van Huyck, J.: Optimization incentives and coordination failure in laboratory stag hunt games. Econometrica 69, 749–764 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, K., Kay, S., Sefton, M.: When are Nash equilibria self-enforcing? An experimental analysis. International Journal of Game Theory 29, 495–515 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R.W., DeJoong, D.V., Forsythe, R., Ross, T.W.: Communication in the battle of the sexes game: some experimental results. RAND Journal of Economics 20, 568–587 (1989)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R.W., DeJoong, D.V., Forsythe, R., Ross, T.W.: Selection criteria in coordination games: some experimental results. American Economic Review 80, 218–233 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R.W., DeJoong, D.V., Forsythe, R., Ross, T.W.: Communication in coordination games. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 107, 739–771 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorsey, R.E., Johnson, J.D., Van Boening, M.V.: The use of artificial neural networks for estimation of decision surfaces in first price sealed bid auctions. In: Cooper, W.W., Whinston, A.B. (eds.) New Directions in Computational Economics, pp. 19–40. Kluwer (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, J., Hopkins, E.: Learning, information, and sorting in market entry games: theory and evidence. Games and Economic Behavior 51, 31–62 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Erev, I., Rapoport, A.: “Coordination, “magic,” and reinforcement learning in a market entry game. Games and Economic Behavior 23, 146–175 (1998)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Erev, I., Roth, A.E.: Predicting how people play games: reinforcement learning in experimental games with unique, mixed strategy equilibria. The American Economic Review 88, 848–881 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, D.: Equilibrium in evolutionary games: some experimental results. The Economic Journal 106, 1–25 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fundenberg, D., Levine, D.K.: The Theory of Learning in Games. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Goeree, J.K., Holt, C.A.: An experimental study of costly coordination. Games and Economic Behavior 51, 349–364 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, D.E.: Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning. Addison Wesley, Massachusetts (1989)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hassoun, M.H.: Fundamentals of Artificial Neural Networks. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J.H., Miller, J.H.: Adaptive intelligent agents in economic theory. American Economic Review 81, 365–370 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  • Leshno, M., Moller, D., Ein-Dor, P.: Neural nets in a group decision process. International Journal of Game Theory 31, 447–467 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, J., Sefton, M.: An experimental investigation of unprofitable games. Games and Economic Behavior 40, 123–146 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ochs, J.: The coordination problem in decentralized markets: an experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 105, 545–559 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ochs, J.: Coordination problems. In: Kagel, J.H., Roth, A.E. (eds.) Handbook of Experimental Economics, ch. 3, pp. 195–251. Priceton University Press, Priceton (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, A., Seale, D.A., Winter, E.: Coordination and learning behavior in large groups with asymmetric players. Games and Economic Behavior 39, 111–136 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, A.E., Erev, I.: Learning in extensive form games: experimental data and simple dynamic models in the intermediate term. Games and Economic Behavior 8, 163–212 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, D., Shupp, R., Walker, J.M., Ostrom, E.: Playing safe in coordination games: the role of risk dominance, payoff dominance, and history of play. Games and Economic Behavior 42, 281–299 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Straub, P.G.: Risk dominance and coordination failures in static games. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 35, 339–363 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundali, J.A., Rapoport, A., Seale, D.A.: Coordination in market entry games with symmetric players. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 64, 203–218 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Huyck, J.B., Battalio, R.C., Rankin, F.W.: On the origin of convention: evidence from coordination games. The Economic Journal 107, 576–596 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Huyck, J.B., Battalio, R.C., Beil, R.O.: Tacit coordination games, strategic uncertainty, and coordination failure. American Economic Review 80, 234–248 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Huyck, J.B., Battalio, R.C., Beil, R.O.: Strategic uncertainty, equilibrium selection, and coordination failure in average opinion games. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 106, 885–910 (1991)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Young, H.P.: Individual Strategy and Social Structure. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1998)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nishizaki, I., Hayashida, T., Hara, N. (2013). Agent-Based Simulation Analysis for Equilibrium Selection and Coordination Failure in Coordination Games Characterized by the Minimum Strategy. In: Nguyen, N.T. (eds) Transactions on Computational Collective Intelligence IX. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7770. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36815-8_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36815-8_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-36814-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-36815-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics