Skip to main content

A Review of Some Recent Results on Power Indices

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Power, Voting, and Voting Power: 30 Years After

Abstract

In this chapter, we provide a review of some recent results on power indices related to work done by the research group SaGaTh. We review axiomatic characterizations of several of the most important indices in the literature. Furthermore, we include a power index based on a desirability relation and two new power indices based on quasi-minimal winning coalitions. Finally, we summarize some results in other areas related with power indices.

This chapter is a reissue based on the work of José M. Alonso-Meijide, Balbina Casas-Méndez and M. Gloria Fiestras-Janeiro (2011), A review of some recent results on power indices, Essays in Honor of Hannu Nurmi, a special number of Homo Oeconomicus 28 (1/2): 143–159

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In this research program more colleagues were involved. We specially want to thank our coauthors Mikel Álvarez-Mozos, Mario Bilbao, Carlos Bowles, Francesc Carreras, Joseph Freixas, Julio R. Fernández, Flavio Ferreira, Manfred J. Holler, Silvia Lorenzo-Freire, Stefan Napel, Andreas Nohn, Guillermo Owen, and Alberto Pinto for the discussions and contributions to this research topic. More information about members and working areas of the group is available in the website http://eio.usc.es/pub/io/xogos/.

  2. 2.

    We will use shorthand notation and write \(S\cup i\) for the set \(S\cup \left\{ i\right\} \) and \(S\backslash i\) for the set \(S\backslash \left\{ i\right\} .\) We will denote by \(s\) the number of members in a finite set \(S\).

References

  • Alonso-Meijide, J. M., & Bowles, C. (2005). Generating functions for coalitional power indices: An application to the IMF. Annals of Operations Research, 137, 21–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alonso-Meijide, J. M., & Casas-Méndez, B. (2007). The public good index when some voters are incompatible. Homo Oeconomicus, 24, 449–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alonso-Meijide, J. M., & Freixas, J. (2010). A new power index based on minimal winning coalitions without any surplus. Decision Support Systems, 49, 70–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alonso-Meijide, J. M., & Holler, M. J. (2009). Freedom of choice and weighted monotonicity of power. Metroeconomica, 60, 571–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alonso-Meijide, J. M., Carreras, F., Fiestras-Janeiro, M. G., & Owen, G. (2007). A comparative axiomatic characterization of the Banzhaf-Owen coalitional value. Decision Support Systems, 43, 701–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alonso-Meijide, J. M., Casas-Méndez, B., Holler, M. J., & Lorenzo-Freire, S. (2008). Computing power indices: Multilinear extensions and new characterizations. European Journal of Operational Research, 188, 540–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alonso-Meijide, J. M., Álvarez-Mozos, M., & Fiestras-Janeiro, M. G. (2009a). The Banzhaf value when some players are incompatible, essays in Honor of Hannu Nurmi, Vol. 1. Homo Oeconomicus, 26, 403–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alonso-Meijide, J. M., Bilbao, J. M., Casas-Méndez, B., & Fernández, J. R. (2009b). Weighted multiple majority games with unions: Generating functions and applications to the European Union. European Journal of Operational Research, 198, 530–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alonso-Meijide, J. M., Bowles, C., Holler, M. J., & Napel, S. (2009c). Monotonicity of power in games with a priori unions. Theory and Decision, 66, 17–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alonso-Meijide, J. M., Casas-Méndez, B., Fiestras-Janeiro, M. G., & Holler, M. J. (2010a). Two variations of the public good index for simple games with a priori unions. Control and Cybernetics, 39, 839–855.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alonso-Meijide, J. M., Casas-Méndez, B., Fiestras-Janeiro, M. G., Holler, M. J., & Nohn, A. (2010b). Axiomatization of public good indices with a priori unions. Social Choice and Welfare, 35, 517–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alonso-Meijide, J. M., Álvarez-Mozos, M., Ferreira, F., & Pinto, A. (2011a). Two new power indices based on winning coalitions. Journal of Difference Equations and Applications, 17, 1095–1100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alonso-Meijide, J. M., Casas-Méndez, B., Fiestras-Janeiro, M. G., & Holler, M. J. (2011b). The Deegan-Packel index for simple games with a priori unions. Quality and Quantity, 45, 425–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Álvarez-Mozos, M. (2012). Essays on Cooperative Games with Restricted Cooperative and Simple Games. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Santiago de Compostela: Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banzhaf, J. F. (1965). Weighted voting doesn’t work: A mathematical analysis. Rutgers Law Review, 19, 317–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brams, S. J., & Affuso, P. J. (1976). Power and size: A new paradox. Theory and Decision, 7, 29–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deegan, J., & Packel, E. W. (1978). A new index of power for simple n-person games. International Journal of Game Theory, 7, 113–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubey, P. (1975). On the uniqueness of the Shapley value. International Journal of Game Theory, 4, 131–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubey, P., & Shapley, L. S. (1979). Mathematical properties of the Banzhaf power index. Mathematics of Operations Research, 4, 99–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felsenthal, D. S., & Machover, M. (1998). The measurement of voting power: Theory and practice, problems and paradoxes. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holler, M. J. (1982). Forming coalitions and measuring voting power. Political Studies, 30, 262–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holler, M. J., & Packel, E. W. (1983). Power, luck and the right index. Journal of Economics, 43, 21–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holler, M. J., & Nohn, A. (2009). The public good index with threats in a priori unions, essays in Honor of Harnu Nurmi, Vol. 1. Homo Oeconomicus, 26, 393–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, R. J. (1978). On the measurement of power: Some reactions to Laver. Environment and Planning A, 10, 907–914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laruelle, A. (1999). On the choice of a power index, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas WP-AD 99–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzo-Freire, S., Alonso-Meijide, J. M., Casas-Méndez, B., & Fiestras-Janeiro, M. G. (2007). Characterizations of the Deegan-Packel and Johnston power indices. European Journal of Operational Research, 177, 431–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, W. F. (1983). Measuring power in weighted voting systems. In S.J. Brams, W. Lucas, P.D. Straffin (Eds.), Political and related models (pp. 183–238). Springer-Verlag: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, G. (1972). Multilinear extensions of games. Management Science, 18, 64–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen, G. (1975). Multilinear extensions and the Banzhaf value. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 22, 741–750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen, G. (1977). Values of games with a priori unions. In R. Henn, O. Moeschlin (Eds.), Essays in mathematical economics and game theory (pp. 76–88). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peleg, B., Sudhölter, P. (2003). Introduction to the theory of cooperative games. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riker, W. H. (1962). The theory of political coalitions. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapley, L. S., & Shubik, M. (1954). A method for evaluating the distribution of power in a committee system. American Political Science Review, 48, 787–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, J. M. (1985). Monotonic solutions of cooperative games. International Journal of Game Theory, 14, 65–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank the suggestions and comments of the referees. This research received financial support from Ministerio Español de Ciencia y Tecnología through Project ECO2008-03484-C02-02 and from Xunta de Galicia through Project INCITE09-207-064-PR.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. M. Alonso-Meijide .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Alonso-Meijide, J., Casas-Méndez, B., Fiestras-Janeiro, M. (2013). A Review of Some Recent Results on Power Indices. In: Holler, M., Nurmi, H. (eds) Power, Voting, and Voting Power: 30 Years After. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35929-3_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35929-3_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-35928-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-35929-3

  • eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics