Skip to main content

Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Quality and Information Technology Control Frameworks

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Accounting Information Systems for Decision Making

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation ((LNISO,volume 3))

Abstract

The objective of this research is to investigate the relation between the Internal Control over Financial Reporting (ICFR) Quality and Information Technology Control (ITC) frameworks compliance. We selected a sample of listed companies in the manufacturing, service and finance industries in Italy. The data were collected with interviews and questionnaires for ITC information and through financial reporting for ICFR Quality. The research methodology included univariate, multivariate and simple linear regressions. The Dechow et al. model, the Kothari et al. model and the Healy model adapted to the finance industry are engaged to measure ICFR Quality. The results show that compliance with COSO report in the manufacturing and services industries and with COBIT and COBIT for SOX frameworks in the finance industry is positively related to ICFR Quality: companies that follow these frameworks’ processes, objectives and test frequency requirements decrease Discretionary Accruals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The equivalent of the SEC in Italy.

References

  1. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB): An audit of internal control over financial reporting performed in conjunction with an audit of financial statements, auditing standard n. 2, PCAOB, Washington (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB): An audit of internal control over financial reporting that is integrated with an audit of financial statements, auditing standard n. 5, PCAOB, Washington (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Securities And Exchange Commission (SEC): Commission guidance regarding management’s report on internal control over financial reporting under section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, (Release Nos. 33-8810; 34-55929), SEC, Washington (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC): Management’s report on control over financial reporting in exchange act periodic reports of non-accelerated filers, (Release Nos, 33-9072; 34-60813), SEC, Washington (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO): Internal control. Integrate framework, AICPA, New York (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO): Guidance for smaller public companies reporting on internal controls over financial reporting, AICPA, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. COBIT: IT Governance Institute, Control Objectives for information and related technology 4.1 (COBIT 4.1), ITGI, USA (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. COBIT for SOX: IT Governance Institute, IT Control objectives for Sarbanes-Oxley: The role of IT in the design and implementation of internal control over financial reporting, 2nd edn. ITGI, USA (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jones, J.J.: Earnings management during import relief investigations. J. Acc. Res. 29, 193–228 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dechow, P.M., Sloan, R.G., Sweeney, A.P.: Detecting earnings management. Acc. Rev. 70, 193–225 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kothari, S.P., Leone, A.J., Wasley, C.E.: Performance matched discretionary accrual measures. J. Acc. Econ. 39, 163–197 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Healy, P.M.: The effect of bonus schemes on accounting decisions. J. Acc. Econ. 7, 85–107 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mascarenhas, D., Cahan, S.F., Naiker, V.: The effect of audit specialists on the informativeness of discretionary accruals. J. Acc. Audit. Finan. 25(1), 53–84 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Subramanyam, K.R.: The pricing of discretionary accruals. J. Acc. Econ. 22, 249–281 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tucker, J.W., Zarowin, P.A.: Does income smoothing improve earnings informativeness? Acc. Rev. 81, 251–270 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Myers, J., Myers, L., Omer, T.: Exploring the term of auditor-client relationship and the quality of earnings: a case for mandatory auditor rotation? Acc. Rev. 78(3), 779–799 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Choi, J.H., Chansog, F.K., Jeong-Bon, K., Zang, Y.: Audit office size, audit quality, and audit pricing. Audit. J. Pract. Theory 29(1), 73–97 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wuchun, C., Huang, H., Liao, Y., Xie, H.: Mandatory audit partner rotation, audit quality, and market perception: evidence from Taiwan. Contemp. Acc. Res. 26(2), 359–391 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ashbaugh-Skaife, H., Collins H.D., Kinney, W.: The discovery and reporting of internal control deficiencies prior to SOX-mandated Audits. J. Acc. Econ. 44 (1–2), 166–92 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Doyle, J., Ge, W., McVay, S.: Determinants of weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting. J. Acc. Econ. 44(1–2), 193–223 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ge, W., McVay, S.: The disclosure of material weaknesses in internal control after the sarbanes-oxley act. Acc. Horiz. 19, 137–158 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. GAIT The Institute of Internal Auditors: The GAIT Methodology, IIA, USA (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  23. GAIT The Institute of Internal Auditors: GAIT for Business and IT Risk, IIA, USA (2008a)

    Google Scholar 

  24. GAIT The Institute of Internal Auditors: GAIT for IT General Control Deficiency Assessments, IIA, USA (2008b)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Harris, S.: Alphabet soup: understanding standards for risk management and compliance. Inf. Secur. Mag. 2, (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wallace, L., Lin, H., Cefaratti, M.A.: Information security and sarbanes-oxley compliance: an exploratory study. J. Inf. Syst. 25(1), 185–211 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Linkhous, J.: Puzzle pieces: the relationship between SOX, COSO and COBIT. Inf. Syst. Control J. 5, (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB): An audit of internal control over financial reporting that is integrated with an audit of financial statements. guidance for auditors of smaller public companies, Auditing Standard n. 5, PCAOB, Washington (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Greenfield, D.: IT by the book. InformationWeek, 35–38 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Von Solms, B.: Information security governance: COBIT or ISO 17799 or both? Comput. Secur. 24, 99–104 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Merhout, J.W., Havelka, D.: Information technology auditing: a value-added IT governance partnership between IT management and audit. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. (CAIS) 23(26), 463–482 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefano Azzali .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Azzali, S., Mazza, T. (2013). Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Quality and Information Technology Control Frameworks. In: Mancini, D., Vaassen, E., Dameri, R. (eds) Accounting Information Systems for Decision Making. Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation, vol 3. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35761-9_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics