Skip to main content

Survival of Monoblock Acetabular Cups Versus an Uncemented Modular Cup Design: A Population-Based Study from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Total Hip Arthroplasty

Abstract

Monoblock acetabular cups represent a subtype of uncemented cups with the polyethylene liner molded into a metal shell, thus eliminating or at least minimizing potential backside wear. We hypothesized that the use of monoblock cups could reduce the incidence of osteolysis and aseptic loosening, and thus improve survival compared with modular designs.

All 210 primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) procedures in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register using uncemented monoblock cups during 1999-2010 were identified. Kaplan-Meier and Cox-regression analysis with adjustment for age, sex, and other variables were used to calculate survival rates and adjusted hazard ratios (HR) of the revision risk for any reason. 1,130 modular cups, inserted during the same time period were used as a control group.

There was a nearly equal sex distribution in both groups. The median age at index operation was 47 years in the monoblock group and 56 years in the control group (p<0.001). The cumulative 5-year survival with any revision as the endpoint was 95% (95% CI 91-98) for monoblock cups and 97% (CI 96-98) for modular cups (p=0.6). The adjusted HR of monoblock cups for revision compared with modular cups was 2 (CI 0.8-6; p=0.1). The use of 28 mm prosthesis heads compared with 22 mm heads decreased the risk of cup revision (HR 0.2, CI 0.1-0.5; p=0.001).

Both cups showed good mid-term survival rates. There was no statistically significant difference in revision risk between the cup designs. Further review of the current patient population is warranted to determine the long-term durability and risk of revision of monoblock cup designs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ali MS, Kumar A (2003) Hydroxyapatite-coated RM cup in primary hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 27:90–93

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • AOA. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry annual report 2009. http://www.dmac.adelaide.edu.au/aoanjrr/publications.jsp

  • Baad-Hansen T, Kold S, Nielsen PT, Laursen MB, Christensen PH, Soballe K (2011) Comparison of trabecular metal cups and titanium fiber-mesh cups in primary hip arthroplasty: a randomized RSA and bone mineral densitometry study of 50 hips. Acta Orthop 82:155–160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berli BJ, Ping G, Dick W, Morscher EW (2007) Nonmodular flexible press-fit cup in primary total hip arthroplasty: 15-year followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res 461:114–121

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bragdon CR, Kwon YM, Geller JA, Greene ME, Freiberg AA, Harris WH, Malchau M (2007) Minimum 6-year followup of highly cross-linked polyethylene in THA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 465:122–127

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bystrom S, Espehaug B, Furnes O, Havelin LI (2003) Femoral head size is a risk factor for total hip luxation: a study of 42,987 primary hip arthroplasties from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop Scand 74:514–524

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Conroy JL, Whitehouse SL, Graves SE, Pratt NL, Ryan P, Crawford RW (2008) Risk factors for revision for early dislocation in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 23:867–872

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dorr LD, Wan Z, Shahrdar C, Sirianni L, Boutary M, Yun A (2005) Clinical performance of a Durasul highly cross-linked polyethylene acetabular liner for total hip arthroplasty at five years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:1816–1821

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garavaglia G, Lubbeke A, Barea C, Roussos C, Peter R, Hoffmeyer P (2011) Ten-year results with the Morscher press-fit cup: an uncemented, non-modular, porous-coated cup inserted without screws. Int Orthop 35:957–963

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • González Della Valle A, Su E, Zoppi A, Sculco TP, Salvati EA (2004) Wear and periprosthetic osteolysis in a match-paired study of modular and nonmodular uncemented acetabular cups. J Arthroplasty 19:972–977

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gwynne-Jones DP, Garneti N, Wainwright C, Matheson JA, King R (2009) The Morscher Press Fit acetabular component: a nine- to 13-year review. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91:859–864

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hailer NP, Garellick G, Karrholm J (2010) Uncemented and cemented primary total hip arthroplasty in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 81:34–41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ihle M, Mai S, Pfluger D, Siebert W (2008) The results of the titanium-coated RM acetabular component at 20 years: a long-term follow-up of an uncemented primary total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90:1284–1290

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kostakos AT, Macheras GA, Frangakis CE, Stafilas KS, Baltas D, Xenakis TA (2010 Jan) Migration of the trabecular metal monoblock acetabular cup system. J Arthroplasty 25(1):35–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarinis S, Karrholm J, Hailer NP (2010) Increased risk of revision of acetabular cups coated with hydroxyapatite. Acta Orthop 81:53–59

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lie SA, Engesaeter LB, Havelin LI, Gjessing HK, Vollset SE (2004) Dependency issues in survival analyses of 55,782 primary hip replacements from 47,355 patients. Stat Med 23:3227–3240

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Macheras G, Kateros K, Kostakos A, Koutsostathis S, Danomaras D, Papagelopoulos PJ (2009) Eight- to ten-year clinical and radiographic outcome of a porous tantalum monoblock ­acetabular component. J Arthroplasty 24:705–709

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Malizos KN, Bargiotas K, Papatheodorou L, Hantes M, Karachalios T (2008) Survivorship of monoblock trabecular metal cups in primary THA: midterm results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:159–166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meneghini RM, Ford KS, McCollough CH, Hanssen AD, Lewallen DG (2010) Bone remodeling around porous metal cementless acetabular components. J Arthroplasty 25:741–747

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morscher E, Masar Z (1988) Development and first experience with an uncemented press-fit cup. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988:96–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Morscher E, Berli B, Jockers W, Schenk R (1997) Rationale of a flexible press fit cup in total hip replacement. 5-year followup in 280 procedures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 341:42–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • National Joint Registry (NJR) of England and Wales (2010) Seventh annual report (April 2009–March 2010). http://www.njrcentre.org.uk

  • Ranstam J, Karrholm J, Pulkkinen P, Makela K, Espehaug B, Pedersen AB, Mehnert F, Furnes O (2011) Statistical analysis of arthroplasty data. II. Guidelines. Acta Orthop 82:258–267

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sculco TP (2002) The acetabular component: an elliptical monoblock alternative. J Arthroplasty 17:118–120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register (2010) Annual report 2010. http://www.jru.orthop.gu.se

  • Weiss RJ, Hailer NP, Stark A, Kärrholm J (2012 Jun) Survival of uncemented acetabular monoblock cups: evaluation of 210 hips in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 83(3):214–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young AM, Sychterz CJ, Hopper RH Jr, Engh CA (2002) Effect of acetabular modularity on ­polyethylene wear and osteolysis in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A:58–63

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rüdiger J. Weiss .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 EFORT

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Weiss, R.J., Kärrholm, J., Stark, A., Hailer, N.P. (2013). Survival of Monoblock Acetabular Cups Versus an Uncemented Modular Cup Design: A Population-Based Study from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. In: Knahr, K. (eds) Total Hip Arthroplasty. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35653-7_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35653-7_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-35652-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-35653-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics