Skip to main content

What Are Models for?

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 7541))

Abstract

In this paper I discuss some of the purposes and functions of building models, particularly agent-based models, and present a comprehensive list of these purposes and functions. Careful thought and attention is needed when modeling domains containing intelligent entities, which is usually the case for agent modeling. Reflection on the challenges involved in such domains leads me to propose the construction of meta-models, which are models of the relationship between an intended model of the domain and the entities in the domain, when the entities may have access to the intended model or its outputs. Agent-based computing approaches provide disciplined means of specifying, designing, developing and evaluating such meta-models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   72.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Rosen, R.: Anticipatory Systems: Philosophical, Mathematical and Methodological Foundations. Pergamon Press, Oxford (1985)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Hughes, R.I.G.: Models and representation. Philosophy of Science 64(suppl.), S325–S336 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Morgan, M.S.: Models, stories and the economic world. Journal of Economic Methodology 8(3), 361–384 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Marks, R.E.: Validating simulation models: a general framework and four applied examples. Journal of Computational Economics 30(3), 265–290 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Midgley, D.F., Marks, R.E., Kunchamwar, D.: Building and assurance of agent-based models: an example and challenge to the field. Journal of Business Research 60(8), 884–893 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Leombruni, R., Richiardi, M.: Why are economists sceptical about agent-based simulations? Physica A 355, 103–109 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. McBurney, P., Parsons, S.: Dialectical argumentation for reasoning about chemical carcinogenicity. Logic Journal of the IGPL 9(2), 191–203 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Friedman, M.: The methodology of positive economics. In: Friedman, M. (ed.) Essays in Positive Economics, pp. 3–43. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1953)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rubinstein, A.: Modeling Bounded Rationality. MIT Press, Cambridge (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Morgan, M.S., Morrison, M.: Models as Mediators. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Morgan, M.S.: Symposium on Marshall’s Tendencies: How models help economists to know. Economics and Philosophy 18, 5–16 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Morgan, M.S.: Imagination and imaging in model building. Philosophy of Science 71, 753–766 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Morgan, M.S.: 1: Modelling as a method of enquiry. Cambridge University Press (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Morgan, M.S., Knuuttila, T.: Models and Modelling in Economics (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sutton, J.: Marshall’s Tendencies: What can economists know? MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  16. McKean, J., Shorter, H., Luck, M., McBurney, P., Willmott, S.: Technology diffusion: the case of agent technologies. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 17(3), 372–396 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Haavelmo, T.: The probability approach in econometrics. Econometrica 12(suppl.), 1–115 (1944)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Boumans, M.: How Economists Model the World to Numbers. Routledge, London (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Smolin, L.: The Trouble With Physics: The Rise of String Theory, the Fall of a Science, and What Comes Next. Houghton Mifflin, New York City (2006)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Wigner, E.P.: The unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in the natural sciences. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics 13, 1–14 (1960)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Muth, J.F.: Rational expectations and the theory of price movements. Econometrica 29(3), 315–335 (1961)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Stigler, G.J.: Do Economists matter? Southern Economic Journal 42(3), 347–354 (1976)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Black, F., Scholes, M.: The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. Journal of Political Economy 81(3), 637–654 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Merton, R.C.: Theory of rational option pricing. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 4(1), 141–183 (1973)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Austin, J.L.: How To Do Things with Words. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  26. MacKenzie, D.A.: An equation and its worlds: Bricolage, exemplars, disunity and performativity in financial economics. Social Studies of Science 33, 831–868 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Alexandrova, A.: Connecting economic models to the real world: game theory and the FCC. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 36, 173–192 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Nik-Khah, E.: Designs on the Mechanism: Economics and the FCC Auctions. Ph.D., University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, USA (December 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kahn, H.: On Thermonuclear War, 2nd edn. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1961); First edition published 1960

    Google Scholar 

  30. Mirowski, P.: Machine Dreams: Economics Becomes a Cyborg Science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Merton, R.K.: Social Theory and Social Structure. Free Press, New York City (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Funder, A.: Stasiland: True Stories from Behind the Berlin Wall. Granta Books, London (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Baden-Fuller, C., Morgan, M.S.: Business models as models. Long Range Planning 43, 156–171 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. McBurney, P., Parsons, S., Green, J.: Forecasting demand for new telecommunications services: an introduction. Telematics and Informatics 19(3), 225–249 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Doganova, L., Eyquem-Renault, M.: What do business models do? innovation devices in technology entrepreneurship. Research Policy 38, 1559–1570 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. The malERA Consultative Group on Modeling: A research agenda for malaria eradication: modeling. PLoS Medicine 8(1), e1000403 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Page, T.: A generic view of toxic chemicals and similar risks. Ecology Law Quarterly 7(2), 207–244 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Fiorino, D.J.: Environmental risk and democratic process: a critical review. Columbia Journal of Environmental Law 14, 501–547 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Graham, J.D., Rhomberg, L.: How risks are identified and assessed. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 545, 15–24 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Graham, J.D., Wiener, J.B. (eds.): Risk Verus Risk: Trade-offs in Protecting Health and the Environment. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Forester, J.: The Deliberative Practitioner: Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes. MIT Press, Cambridge (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Hardie, I., MacKenzie, D.: Assembling an economic actor: the agencement of a hedge fund. The Sociological Review 55(1), 57–80 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Muniesa, F., Millo, Y., Callon, M.: An introduction to market devices. The Sociological Review 55, 1–12 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Rehg, W.: Reason and rhetoric in Habermas’s Theory of Argumentation. In: Jost, W., Hyde, M.J. (eds.) Rhetoric and Hermeneutics in Our Time: A Reader, pp. 358–377. Yale University Press, New Haven (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Bailer-Jones, D.M.: When scientific models represent. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 17(1), 59–74 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Epstein, J.M.: Why model? Keynote address to the Second World Congress on Social Simulation. George Mason University, USA (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Wohlrapp, H.: A new light on non-deductive argumentation schemes. Argumentation 12, 341–350 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Bagley, T.H.: Spy Wars: Moles, Mysteries and Deadly Games. Yale University Press, New Haven (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Wooldridge, M.J., Jennings, N.R., Kinny, D.: The Gaia methodology for agent-oriented analysis and design. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 3(3), 285–312 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Ditmarsch, H., Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic. Synthese Library, vol. 337. Springer, Berlin (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

McBurney, P. (2012). What Are Models for?. In: Cossentino, M., Kaisers, M., Tuyls, K., Weiss, G. (eds) Multi-Agent Systems. EUMAS 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7541. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34799-3_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34799-3_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-34798-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-34799-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics