Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 7654))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Relations between all constitutional and government organs must be moderated and evaluated depending on their way of decision making. Among their attributes one may find the right to veto. It is known already that a priori veto is rather strengthening the position of beholder. The evaluation of a power to make a decision is directly connected with a way of power measuring, i.e. with power index choice. In the paper we consider axiomatic base for such choice of an index of power evaluation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alonso-Meijide, J.M., Carreras, F., Fiestras-Janeiro, M.G., Owen, G.: A comparative axiomatic characterization of the Banzhaf-Owen coalitional value. Decision Support Systems 43, 701–712 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banzhaf III, J.F.: Weighted voting doesn’t work: a mathematical analysis. Rutgers Law Review 19, 317–343 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertini, C., Freixas, J., Gambarelli, G., Stach, I.: Comparing Power Indices. In: Fragnelli, V., Gambarelli, G. (eds.) Some Open Problems in Applied Cooperative Games - A Special Issue of the International Game Theory Review (forthcoming, 2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chessa, M., Fragnelli, V.: Open problems in veto theory. In: Fragnelli, V., Gambarelli, G. (eds.) Some Open Problems in Applied Cooperative Games - A Special Issue of the International Game Theory Review (forthcoming, 2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubey, A., Neyman, R.J., Weber, R.J.: Value theory without efficiency. Mathematics of Operations Research 6, 122–128 (1981)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Einy, E., Haimanko, O.: Characterization of the Shapley-Shubik power index without efficiency axiom, Discussion Paper 10-04, Monaster Center for Economic Research, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • HoÅ‚ubiec, J.W., Mercik, J.W.: Inside Voting Procedures, Accedo Verlagsgesellschaft, Munich (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitamura, M., Inohara, T.: A characterization of the com-pleteness of blockability relation with respect to unanimity. Applied Mathematics and Computation 197, 715–718 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kitamura, M., Inohara, T.: An extended Power Index to Evaluate Coalition Influence Based on Blockability Relations on Simple Games. In: Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, San Antonio (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Laruelle, A., Valenciano, F.: Shapley-Shubik and Banzhaf indices revisited. IVIE Working Paper V-114-2000 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercik, J.W.: A priori veto power of the president of Poland. Operations Research and Decisions 4, 141–150 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercik, J.: On a Priori Evaluation of Power of Veto. In: Herrera-Viedma, E., García-Lapresta, J.L., Kacprzyk, J., Fedrizzi, M., Nurmi, H., Zadrożny, S. (eds.) Consensual Processes. STUDFUZZ, vol. 267, pp. 145–156. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Owen, G.: Modification of the Banzhaf-Coleman Index for Games with a Priori Unions. In: Holler, M.J. (ed.) Power, Voting and Voting Power, pp. 232–238. Physica Verlag, Wurzburg-Wien (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, L.S.: The Elementary Statistics of Majority Voting. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 109, 53–57 (1946)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapley, L.S.: A Value for n-person Games. In: Kuhn, H.W., Tucker, A.W. (eds.) Contributions to the Theory of Games. Annals of Mathematical Studies, vol. 28, pp. 307–317. Princeton University Press (1953)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapley, L.S., Shubik, M.: A method of evaluating the distribution of power in a committee system. American Political Science Review 48(3), 787–792 (1954)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turnovec, F., Mercik, J., Mazurkiewicz, M.: Power indices: Shapley-Shubik or Penrose-Banzhaf? In: Kulikowski, R., Kacprzyk, J., SÅ‚owiÅ„ski, R. (eds.) Operational Research and Systems 2004. Decision Making. Methodological Base and Applications, pp. 121–127. Exit, Warszawa (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnovec, F., Mercik, J., Mazurkiewicz, M.: Power indices methodology: decisiveness, pivots and swings. In: Braham, M., Steffen, F. (eds.) Power, Freedom, and Voting. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mercik, J. (2012). On Axiomatization of Power Index of Veto. In: Nguyen, NT., Hoang, K., JÈ©drzejowicz, P. (eds) Computational Collective Intelligence. Technologies and Applications. ICCCI 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7654. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34707-8_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34707-8_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-34706-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-34707-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics