Abstract
A finite register method of processing dialog transcripts is used to measure interlocutor synchrony. Successive contributions by participants are measured for word n-gram repetitions and temporal overlaps. The Zipfian distribution of words in language use leads to a natural expectation that random re-orderings of dialog contributions will unavoidably exhibit repetition – one might reasonably expect that the frequency of repetition in actual dialog is in fact best explained as a random effect. Accordingly, significance is assessed with respect to randomized contrast values. The contrasts are obtained from averages over randomized reorderings of dialog contributions with temporal spans of the revised dialogs guided by the original durations. Benchmark distributions for allo-repetition and self-repetition are established from existing dialog transcripts covering a pair of pragmatically different circumstances: ATR English language “lingua franca” discussions, Air-Traffic communications (Flight 1549 over the Hudson River). Repetition in actual dialog exceeds the frequency one might expect from a random process. Perhaps surprisingly from the perspective of using repetition as an index of synchrony, self-repetition significantly exceeds allo-repetition.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Altmann, U.: Investigation of Movement Synchrony Using Windowed Cross-Lagged Regression. In: Esposito, A., Vinciarelli, A., Vicsi, K., Pelachaud, C., Nijholt, A. (eds.) Communication and Enactment 2010. LNCS, vol. 6800, pp. 335–345. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
Bard, E.G., Anderson, A., Sotillo, C., Aylett, M., Doherty-Sneddon, G., Newlands, A.: Controlling the intelligibility of referring expressions in dialogue. Journal of Memory and Language 42, 1–22 (2000)
Bouamrane, M.M., Luz, S.: An analytical evaluation of search by content and interaction patterns on multimodal meeting records. Multimedia Systems 13, 89–102 (2007), doi:10.1007/s00530-007-0087-8
Brazy, D.: Group chairman’s factual report of investigation: Cockpit voice recorder dca09ma026 (2009), docket Number SA-532, Exhibit 12, National Transporation Safety Board, http://ntsb.gov/dockets/aviation/dca09ma026/420526.pdf (last verified June 2010)
Campbell, N.: An audio-visual approach to measuring discourse synchrony in multimodal conversation data. In: Proceedings of Interspeech 2009 (2009)
Cushing, S.: Fatal Words: Communication Clashes and Aircraft Crashes. University of Chicago Press (1994)
Godfrey, J.J., Holliman, E.: Switchboard-1 release 2 (1997), linguistic Data Consortium
Graff, D., Bird, S.: Many uses, many annotations for large speech corpora: Switchboard and TDT as case studies. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, pp. 427–433. European Language Resources Association, Paris (2000)
Murtagh, F., Ganz, A., McKie, S.: The structure of narrative: the case of film scripts. CoRR (2008), http://arxiv.org/abs/0805.3799
Oertel, C., De Looze, C., Scherer, S., Windmann, A., Wagner, P., Campbell, N.: Towards the Automatic Detection of Involvement in Conversation. In: Esposito, A., Vinciarelli, A., Vicsi, K., Pelachaud, C., Nijholt, A. (eds.) Communication and Enactment 2010. LNCS, vol. 6800, pp. 163–170. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
Ramseyer, F., Tschacher, W.: Nonverbal Synchrony or Random Coincidence? How to Tell the Difference. In: Esposito, A., Campbell, N., Vogel, C., Hussain, A., Nijholt, A. (eds.) COST 2102 Int. Training School 2009. LNCS, vol. 5967, pp. 182–196. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Reitter, D., Keller, F., Moore, J.: Computational modeling of structural priming in dialogue. In: Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference of the North American Chapter of the ACL, pp. 121–124. Association for Computational Linguistics (2006)
Reitter, D., Moore, J.: Predicting success in dialogue. In: Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics, pp. 808–815. Association for Computational Linguistics (2007)
Richardson, D.C., Dale, R., Schokley, K.: Synchrony and swing in conversation: coordination, temporal dynamics and communication. In: Wachsmuth, I., Lenzen, M., Knoblich, G. (eds.) Embodied Communication. Oxford University Press (2008)
Stormark, K.M., Braarud, H.C.: Infants’ sensitivity to social contingency: a “double video” study of face-to-face communication between 2- and 4-month-olds and their mothers. Infant Behavior & Development 27, 195–203 (2004)
Sun, X., Nijholt, A.: Multimodal Embodied Mimicry in Interaction. In: Esposito, A., Vinciarelli, K., Vicsi, C., Pelachaud, A. (eds.) Communication and Enactment 2010. LNCS, vol. 6800, pp. 147–153. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
Tannen, D.: Talking voices: repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Vogel, C., Behan, L. (2012). Measuring Synchrony in Dialog Transcripts. In: Esposito, A., Esposito, A.M., Vinciarelli, A., Hoffmann, R., Müller, V.C. (eds) Cognitive Behavioural Systems. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7403. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34584-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34584-5_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-34583-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-34584-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)