Skip to main content

Tumors of the Soft Tissue and Bone

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cancer Grading Manual

Abstract

Tumors of the soft tissues and bones form a heterogeneous group that includes on one hand common benign neoplasms and, on the other less common, variably malignant neoplasms (sarcomas). Recent advances in molecular and cell biology have considerably influenced the present clinical approach to these tumors. As the classifications of these tumors and most notably soft tissue sarcomas constantly change and are refined by the addition of new data, the grading of soft tissue and bone sarcomas remains a work in progress [1, 2]. Accordingly we shall present only the most established grading systems used in daily surgical pathology practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Articles

  1. Fletcher CD (2006) The evolving classification of soft tissue tumours: an update based on the new WHO classification. Histopathology 48:3–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Deyrup AT, Weiss SW (2006) Grading of soft tissue sarcomas: the challenge of providing precise information in an imprecise world. Histopathology 48:42–50

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Costa J, Wesley RA, Glatstein E, Rosenberg SA (1984) The grading of soft tissue sarcomas. Results of a clinicopathologic correlation in a series of 163 cases. Cancer 53:530–541

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Trojani M, Contesso G, Coindre JM et al (1984) Soft-tissue sarcomas of adults; study of pathological prognostic variables and definition of a histopathological grading system. Int J Cancer 33:37–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Coindre J-M (2006) Grading of soft tissue sarcoma. Review and update. Arch Pathol Lab Med 130:1448–1453

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Golouh R, Bracko M (2001) What is the current practice in soft tissue sarcoma grading? Radiol Oncol 35:47–52

    Google Scholar 

  7. Coindre JM, Trojani M, Conteso G et al (1986) Reproducibility of a histopathologic grading system for adult soft tissue sarcoma. Cancer 58:306–309

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Guillou L, Coindre J-M, Bonichon F et al (1997) Comparative study of the National Cancer Institute and French Federation of Cancer Centers Sarcoma Group grading systems in a population of 410 adult patients with soft tissue sarcoma. J Clin Oncol 15:350–362

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Oliveira AM, Nascimento AG (2001) Grading of soft tissue tumors: principles and problems. Skeletal Radiol 30:543–559

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Association of Directors of Anatomic and Surgical Pathology (1998) Recommendations for the reporting of soft tissue sarcomas. Mod Pathol 11:1257–1261

    Google Scholar 

  11. Henricks WH, Chu YC, Goldblum JR, Weiss SW (1997) Dedifferentiated liposarcoma: a clinicopathological analysis of 155 cases with a proposal for an expanded definition of dedifferentiation. Am J Surg Pathol 21:271–281

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Parham DM, Webber BL, Jenkins JJ 3rd et al (1995) Nonrhabdomyosarcomatous soft tissue sarcomas of childhood: formulation of a simplified system for grading. Mod Pathol 8:705–710

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wong W, Hirose T, Scheithauer BW, Schild SE, Gunderson LL (1998) Malignant peripheral sheath tumor: analysis of treatment outcome. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 42:351–360

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gustafson P, Ảkerman M, Alvergard TA et al (2003) Prognostic information in soft tissue sarcoma using size, vascular invasion and microscopic tumour necrosis – the SIN system. Eur J Cancer 39:1568–1576

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hasegawa T, Yamamoto S, Yokoyama R et al (2002) Prognostic significance of grading and staging systems using MIB-1 score in adult patients with soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities and trunk. Cancer 95:843–851

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tateishi U, Hasegava T, Beppu Y et al (2003) Prognostic significance of grading (MIB-1 system) in patients with myxoid liposarcoma. J Clin Pathol 56:579–582

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Nielsen TO, West RB, Linn SC et al (2002) Molecular characterization of soft tissue tumours: a gene expression study. Lancet 239:1301–1307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Segal NH, Pavlidis P, Antonescu CR et al (2003) Classification and subtype prediction of adult soft tissue sarcoma by functional genomics. Am J Pathol 163:691–700

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Antonescu CR (2006) The role of genetic testing in soft tissue sarcoma. Histopathology 48:13–21

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Taylor BS, Barretina J, Maki RG et al (2011) Advances in sarcoma genomics and new therapeutic targets. Nat Rev Cancer 11:541–557

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Mills AM, Beck AH, Montgomery KD et al (2011) Expression of subtype-specific group 1 leiomyosarcoma markers in a wide variety of sarcomas by gene expression analysis and immunohistochemistry. Am J Surg Pathol 35:583–589

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mariani L, Miceli R, Kattan MW et al (2005) Validation and adaptation of a nomogram for ­predicting the survival of patients with extremity soft tissue sarcoma using a three-grade system. Cancer 103:402–408

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hogendoorn PC, Collin F, Daugaard S, Pathology and Biology Subcommittee of the EORTC Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group et al (2004) Changing concepts in the pathological basis of soft tissue and bone sarcoma treatment. Eur J Cancer 40:1644–1654

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Inwards CY, Unni KK (1995) Classification and grading of bone sarcomas. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 9:545–569

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Evans HL, Ayala AG, Romsdahl MM (1977) Prognostic factors in chondrosarcoma of bone. A clinicopathologic analysis with emphasis on histologic grading. Cancer 40:818–831

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Welkerling H, Kratz S, Ewerbeck V, Delling G (2003) A reproducible and simple grading system for ­classical chondrosarcomas. Analysis of 35 chondrosarcomas and 16 enchondromas with emphasis on recurrence rate and radiological and clinical data. Virchows Arch 443:725–733

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Eefting D, Schrage YM, Geirnaerdt MJ et al (2009) Assessment of interobserver variability and histologic parameters to improve reliability in classification and grading of central cartilaginous tumors. Am J Surg Pathol 33:50–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Meijer D, de Jong D, Pansuriya TC et al (2012) Genetic characterization of mesenchymal, clear cell, and dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 51:899–909

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Borys D, Canter RJ, Hoch B, Martinez SR et al (2012) P16 expression predicts necrotic response among patients with osteosarcoma receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Hum Pathol 43:1948–1954

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Bovée JV, Hogendoorn PC (2010) Molecular pathology of sarcomas: concepts and clinical implications. Virchows Arch 456:193–199

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Szuhai K, Cleton-Jansen AM, Hogendoorn PC et al (2012) Molecular pathology and its diagnostic use in bone tumors. Cancer Genet 205:193–204

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Carneiro A, Bendahl PO, Engellau J et al (2011) A prognostic model for soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities and trunk wall based on size, vascular invasion, necrosis, and growth pattern. Cancer 117:1279–1287

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zoran Gatalica M.D., D.Sc .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gatalica, Z., Fetsch, J.F., Miettinen, M., Damjanov, I. (2013). Tumors of the Soft Tissue and Bone. In: Damjanov, I., Fan, F. (eds) Cancer Grading Manual. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34516-6_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34516-6_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-34515-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-34516-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics