Skip to main content

Mass Classification in Digitized Mammograms Using Texture Features and Artificial Neural Network

  • Conference paper
Neural Information Processing (ICONIP 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 7667))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

A technique is proposed to classify regions of interests (ROIs) of digitized mammograms into mass and non-mass regions using texture features and artificial neural network (ANN). Fifty ROIs were extracted from the MIAS MiniMammographic Database, with 25 ROIs containing masses and 25 ROIs containing normal breast tissue only. Twelve texture features were derived from the gray level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) of each region. The sequential forward selection technique was used to select four significant features from the twelve features. These significant features were used in the ANN to classify the ROI into either mass or non-mass region. By using leave-one-out method on the 50 images using the four significant features, classification accuracy of 86% was achieved for ANN. The test result using the four significant features is better than the full set of twelve features. The proposed method is compared with some existing works and promising results are obtained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Constantinidis, A.S., Fairhurst, M.C., Deravi, F., Hanson, M., Wells, C.P., Chapman-Jones, C.: Evaluating Classification Strategies for Detection of Circumscribed Masses in Digital Mammograms. In: Proceedings of 7th Int’l Conference on Image Processing and Its Applications, pp. 435–439 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bovis, K., Singh, S., Fieldsend, J., Pinder, C.: Identification of Masses in Digital Mammograms with MLP and RBF Nets. In: Proceedings of the IEEE-INNS-ENNS International joint Conference in Neural Networks, pp. 342–347 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tang, J., Rangayyan, R.M., Xu, J., Naqa, I.E., Yang, Y.: Computer-Aided Detection and Diagnosis of Breast Cnacer with Mammography: Recent Advances. IEEE Trans. on Information Technology in Biomedicine 13(2), 236–251 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cheng, H., Cai, X.P., Chen, X.W., Hu, X.L., Lou, X.L.: Computer Aided Detection and Classification of Microcalcifications in Mammograms: a Survey. Pattern Recognition 36, 2967–2991 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Cheng, H., Shi, X., Min, R., Hu, L., Cai, X., Du, H.: Approaches for Automated Detection & Classification of Masses in Mammograms. Pattern Recognition 39, 664–668 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Whitney, A.W.: A Direct Method of Nonparametric Measurement Selection. IEEE Trans. on Computers C-20(9), 1100–1103 (1971)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Christoyianni, I., Dermatas, E., Kokkinakis, G.: Neural Classification of Abnormal Tissue in Digital mammography Using Statistical Features of the Texture. In: Proc. of the 6th IEEE Int’l Conf. on Electronics, Circuits & Systems, vol. 1, pp. 117–120 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Petrosian, A., Chan, H., Helvie, M., Goodsitt, M., Adler, D.: Computer-aided Diagnosis in Mammography: Classification of Mass and Normal Tissue by Texture Analysis. Physics in Medicine and Biology 39(12), 2273–2288 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chan, H., Wei, D., Helvie, M., Sahiner, B., Adler, D., Goodsitt, M., Petrick, N.: Computer-aided Classification of Mammographic Masses and Normal Tissue: Linear Discriminant Analysis in Texture Feature Space. Physics in Med. & Biol. 40, 857–876 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Haralick, R.M., Shanmugam, K., Dinstein, I.: Texture Features for Image Classification. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybernet. 3(6), 610–621 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Masters, T.: Practical Neural Network Recipes in C++. UK edn. Academic Press (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Suckling, J., Parker, J., Dance, D., Astley, S., Hutt, I., Boggis, C., Ricketts, I., Stamatakis, E., Cerneaz, N., Kok, S., Taylor, P., Betal, D., Savage, J.: The Mammographic Image Analysis Society digital mammogram database. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Digital Mammography, vol. 1069, pp. 375–378 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wong, M.T., He, X., Nguyen, H., Yeh, WC. (2012). Mass Classification in Digitized Mammograms Using Texture Features and Artificial Neural Network. In: Huang, T., Zeng, Z., Li, C., Leung, C.S. (eds) Neural Information Processing. ICONIP 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7667. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34500-5_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34500-5_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-34499-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-34500-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics