Skip to main content

Prospects and Challenges of Landmarks in Navigation Services

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Cognitive and Linguistic Aspects of Geographic Space

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography ((LNGC))

Abstract

In the past decades, empirical research has established the importance of landmarks in our understanding of and communication about space. These findings have led to the development of several computational approaches for the automatic identification and integration of landmarks in navigation instructions. However, so far this research has failed to make any impact on commercial services. This chapter will discuss reasons for this failure. It will develop a categorization of existing approaches and highlight their shortcomings. Finally, principles and methods of user-generated content will be identified as a promising, feasible way forward to future landmark-based navigation services.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.whereis.com.au

  2. 2.

    Often, however, this is done without taking into account the presence of other traffic lights. It is not uncommon to get instructions, such as ‘in 500 m, at the traffic lights, turn left,’ with another set or two of traffic lights before the one referred to.

  3. 3.

    http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/ols

  4. 4.

    Accessed on March 29, 2010.

  5. 5.

    To get a better idea of what this means: if landmark candidates were evenly distributed across Australia, there would be roughly 200 candidates within the area of Melbourne, or about 1 feature every 45 km2.

  6. 6.

    http://www.panoramio.com

  7. 7.

    http://www.flickr.com

  8. 8.

    http://images.google.com/imagelabeler/

  9. 9.

    https://www.mturk.com/mturk/welcome

References

  • Ahn L, Liu R, Blum M (2006) Peekaboom: a game for locating objects in images. In: CHI ‘06: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, New York, pp 55–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Alfaro LD, Kulshreshtha A, Pye I, Adler BT (2011) Reputation systems for open collaboration. Commun ACM 54(8):81–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilandzic M, Foth M, De Luca A (2008) CityFlocks: designing social navigation for urban mobile information systems. In: DIS ‘08: Proceedings of the 7th ACM conference on designing interactive systems. ACM, New York, pp 174–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Budhathoki NR, Nedovic-Budic Z, Bruce B (2010) An interdisciplinary frame for understanding volunteered geographic information. Geomatica 64(1):11–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnett G, Smith D, May A (2001) Supporting the navigation task: characteristics of ‘good’ landmarks. In: Hanson MA (ed) Contemporary ergonomics 2001. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 441–446

    Google Scholar 

  • Caduff D, Timpf S (2005) The landmark spider: representing landmark knowledge for wayfinding tasks. In: Barkowsky T, Freksa C, Hegarty M, Lowe R (eds) Reasoning with mental and external diagrams: computational modeling and spatial assistance—papers from the 2005 AAAI spring symposium, Menlo Park, pp 30–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Couclelis H, Golledge RG, Gale N, Tobler W (1987) Exploring the anchor-point hypothesis of spatial cognition. J Environ Psychol 7:99–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crandall DJ, Backstrom L, Huttenlocher D, Kleinberg J (2009) Mapping the world’s photos. In: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on world wide web. ACM, Madrid, pp 761–770, 1526812

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale R, Geldof S, Prost J-P (2005) Using natural language generation in automatic route description. J Res Pract Inf Technol 37(1):89–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Denis M (1997) The description of routes: a cognitive approach to the production of spatial discourse. Cahiers Psychologie Cognitive 16(4):409–458

    Google Scholar 

  • Duckham M, Winter S, Robinson M (2010) Including landmarks in routing instructions. J Locat Based Serv 4(1):28–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elias B (2003) Extracting landmarks with data mining methods. In: Kuhn W, Worboys M, Timpf S (eds) Spatial information theory. Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Berlin, pp 375–389

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias B, Paelke V, Kuhnt S (2005) Concepts for the cartographic visualization of landmarks. In: Gartner G (ed) Location based services & telecartography. Geowissenschaftliche Mitteilungen, TU Vienna, pp 1149–1155

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias B, Sester M (2006) Incorporating landmarks with quality measures in routing procedures. In: Raubal M, Miller H, Frank A, Goodchild M (eds) Geographic information science. Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Berlin, pp 65–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanagin A, Metzger M (2008) The credibility of volunteered geographic information. GeoJournal 72(3):137–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodchild M (2007) Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal 69(4):211–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haklay M (2010) How good is volunteered geographic information? A comparative study of OpenStreetMap and ordnance survey datasets. Environ Plan B Plan Des 37(4):682–703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen S, Richter K-F, Klippel A (2006) Landmarks in OpenLS—a data structure for cognitive ergonomic route directions. In: Raubal M, Miller H, Frank AU, Goodchild MF (eds) Geographic information science. Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Berlin, pp 128–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirtle SC, Jonides J (1985) Evidence of hierarchies in cognitive maps. Mem Cogn 13(3):208–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollenstein L, Purves R (2010) Exploring place through user-generated content: Using Flickr to describe city cores. J Spat Inf Sci 1:21–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Klippel A (2003) Wayfinding choremes. In: Kuhn W, Worboys M, Timpf S (eds) Spatial information theory. Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Berlin, pp 320–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Klippel A, Hansen S, Richter K-F, Winter S (2009) Urban granularities—a data structure for cognitively ergonomic route directions. GeoInformatica 13(2):223–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klippel A, Richter K-F, Hansen S (2005) Structural salience as a landmark. In: Workshop mobile maps 2005, Salzburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Klippel A, Winter S (2005) Structural salience of landmarks for route directions. In: Cohn AG, Mark D (eds) Spatial information theory. Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Berlin, pp 347–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Krumm J, Davies N, Narayanaswami C (2008) User-generated content. Pervasive Comput 7(4):10–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovelace KL, Hegarty M, Montello DR (1999) Elements of good route directions in familiar and unfamiliar environments. In: Freksa C, Mark DM (eds) Spatial information theory. Lecture notes in computer science. Berlin, Springer, pp 65–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch K (1960) The image of the city. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • May AJ, Ross T, Bayer SH, Tarkiainen MJ (2003) Pedestrian navigation aids: information requirements and design implications. Pers Ubiquit Comput 7(6):331–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michon P-E, Denis M (2001) When and why are visual landmarks used in giving directions? In: Montello DR (ed) Spatial information theory. Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Berlin, pp 400–414

    Google Scholar 

  • Mummidi L, Krumm J (2008) Discovering points of interest from users’ map annotations. GeoJournal 72(3):215–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Presson CC, Montello DR (1988) Points of reference in spatial cognition: stalking the elusive landmark. Br J Dev Psychol 6:378–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Priedhorsky R, Jordan B, Terveen L (2007) How a personalized geowiki can help bicyclists share information more effectively. In: WikiSym ‘07: Proceedings of the 2007 international symposium on wikis. ACM, New York, pp 93–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Raubal M, Winter S (2002) Enriching wayfinding instructions with local landmarks. In: Egenhofer M, Mark D (eds) Geographic information science. Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Berlin, pp 243–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter K-F (2007) A uniform handling of different landmark types in route directions. In: Winter S, Duckham M, Kulik L, Kuipers B (eds) Spatial information theory. Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Berlin, pp 373–389

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter KF (2008) Context-Specific Route Directions - Generation of Cognitively Motivated Wayfinding Instructions, DisKi 314 / SFB/TR 8 Monographs Volume 3. IOS Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter K-F, Klippel A (2007) Before or after: prepositions in spatially constrained systems. In: Barkowsky T, Knauff M, Ligozat G, Montello DR (eds) Spatial cognition V. Lecture notes in artificial intelligence. Springer, Berlin, pp 453–469

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter K-F, Winter S (2011) Citizens as database: conscious ubiquity in data collection. In: Pfoser D, Tao Y, Mouratidis K, Nascimento M, Mokbel M, Shekhar S, Huang Y (eds) Advances in spatial and temporal databases. Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Berlin, pp 445–448

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross T, Burnett G (2001) Evaluating the human-machine interface to vehicle navigation systems as an example of ubiquitous computing. Int J Hum Comput Stud 55:661–674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross T, May A, Thompson S (2004) The use of landmarks in pedestrian navigation instructions and the effects of context. In: Brewster S, Dunlop M (eds) Mobile computer interaction-MobileHCI 2004. Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Berlin, pp 300–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadeghian P, Kantardzic M (2008) The new generation of automatic landmark detection systems: challenges and guidelines. Spat Cogn Comput Interdisc J 8(3):252–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlieder C, Matyas C (2009) Photographing a city: an analysis of place concepts based on spatial choices. Spat Cogn Comput Interdisc J 9(3):212–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel AW, White SH (1975) The development of spatial representations of large-scale environments. In: Reese HW (ed) Advances in child development and behaviour. Academic Press, New York, pp 9–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorrows ME, Hirtle SC (1999) The nature of landmarks for real and electronic spaces. In: Freksa C, Mark DM (eds) Spatial information theory. Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Berlin, pp 37–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Sui DZ (2008) The wikification of GIS and its consequences: or Angelina Jolie’s new tattoo and the future of GIS. Comput Environ Urban Syst 32(1):1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tezuka T, Tanaka K (2005) Landmark extraction: a web mining approach. In: Cohn AG, Mark DM (eds) Spatial information theory. Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Berlin, pp 379–396

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomko M (2004) Case study—assessing spatial distribution of web resources for navigation services. In: 4th international workshop on web and wireless geographical information systems W2GIS04, Koyang

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomko M, Winter S (2009) Pragmatic construction of destination descriptions for urban environments. Spat Cogn Comput Interdisc J 9(1):1–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner DB (2009) Bestimmung von Landmarken aus räumlichen Daten. Diploma thesis, Universität Bremen

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams S (1998) Generating pitch accents in a concept-to-speech system using a knowledge base. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on spoken language processing, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter S (2003) Route adaptive selection of salient features. In: Kuhn W, Worboys M, Timpf S (eds) Spatial information theory. Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Berlin, pp 349–361

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter S, Raubal M, Nothegger C (2005) Focalizing measures of salience for wayfinding. In: Meng L, Zipf A, Reichenbacher T (eds) Map-based mobile services—theories, methods and implementations. Springer, Berlin, pp 127–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter S, Tomko M, Elias B, Sester M (2008) Landmark hierarchies in context. Environ Plan B Plan Des 35(3):381–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Mitra P, Xu S, Jaiswal AR, Klippel A, Maceachren A (2009) Extracting route directions from web pages. In: Twelth international workshop on web and databases (WebDB 2009), Providence

    Google Scholar 

  • Zielstra D, Zipf A (2010) A comparative study of proprietary geodata and volunteered geographic information for Germany. In: Painho M, Santos MY, Pundt H (eds) Geospatial thinking: Proceedings of 13th AGILE international conference on geographic information science 2010

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

A first draft of this chapter was written while the author was at the School of Information Science, The University of Pittsburgh. The ideas presented in the outlook greatly benefited from discussions at the School with Stephen Hirtle, Sherry Koshman, Hassan Karimi and Peter Brusilovsky, as well as later on with Stephan Winter at the University of Melbourne. Martin Tomko provided further feedback on an earlier draft of this chapter. The author received support for attending the meeting in Las Navas from the Transregional Collaborative Research Center SFB/TR 8 Spatial Cognition which is funded by the DFG. Feedback by the participants of that meeting, especially Martin Raubal, is also gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kai-Florian Richter .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Richter, KF. (2013). Prospects and Challenges of Landmarks in Navigation Services. In: Raubal, M., Mark, D., Frank, A. (eds) Cognitive and Linguistic Aspects of Geographic Space. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34359-9_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics