Abstract
Humanoid robots are designed and shaped to have physical bodies resembling humans. The anthropomorphic shape is aiming at facilitating interactions between humans and robots with the ultimate goal of making robots acceptable social partners. This attempt is not very new to roboticists and there is an increasing body of research showing the importance of robots’ appearance in HRI; the Uncanny Valley proposed in the 70’s [1] is however still an open problem. Our aim in this contribution is to examine how human perceptual mechanisms involved in action observation are influenced by the external shape of observed robots. Our present results show that observing robotic/cartoon hands performing grasping/pointing movements elicits similar perceptual mechanisms as observing other humans. Hence, it seems that observing actions of artificial systems can induce similar perceptual effects as observing actions of humans.
Keywords
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Mori, M.: Bukimi no tani The uncanny valley (K. F. MacDorman & T. Minato, Trans.). Energy 7(4), 33–35 (1970) (originally in Japanese)
Sternberg, S.: The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders’ method. In: Koster, W.G. (ed.) Attention and Performance II. Acta Psychol., vol. 30, pp. 276–315 (1969)
Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., Prinz, W.: The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behav. Brain Sci. 24, 849–878 (2001)
Prinz, W.: Perception and action planning. Eur. J. Cogn. Psychol. 9, 129–154 (1997)
Hommel, B.: Grounding attention in action control: The intentional control of selection. In: Bruya, B.J. (ed.) Effortless Attention: A New Perspective in the Cognitive Science of Attention and Action, pp. 121–140. MIT Press, Cambridge (2010)
Wykowska, A., Schubö, A., Hommel, B.: How you move is what you see: Action planning biases selection in visual search. J. Exp. Psychol. Human 35, 1755–1769 (2009)
Wykowska, A., Hommel, B., Schubö, A.: Action-induced effects on perception depend neither on element-level nor on set-level similarity between stimulus and response sets. Atten. Percept. Psycho. 73, 1034–1041 (2011)
Schubotz, R.I., von Cramon, D.Y.: Predicting perceptual events activates corresponding motor schemes in lateral premotor cortex: An fMRI study. Neuroimage 15, 787–796 (2002)
Rizzolatti, G., Craighero, L.: The Mirror-Neuron System. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 27, 169–192 (2004)
Rizzolatti, G., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V.: Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2, 661–670 (2001)
Gallese, V., Goldman, A.: Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2, 493–501 (1998)
Carr, L., Iacoboni, M., Dubeau, M.-C., Mazziotta, J.C., Lenzi, G.L.: Neural mechanisms of empathy in humans: a relay from neural systems for imitation to limbic areas. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 5497–5502 (2003)
Fagioli, S., Hommel, B., Schubotz, R.I.: Intentional control of attention: Action planning primes action related stimulus dimensions. Psychol. Res. 71, 22–29 (2007)
Oberman, L.M., McCmeery, J.P., Ramachandran, V.S., Pineda, J.A.: EEG evidence for mirror neuron activity during the observation of human and robot actions: Toward an analysis of the human qualities of interactive robots. Neurocomputing 70, 2194–2203 (2007)
Oztop, E., Franklin, D.W., Chaminade, T., Cheng, G.: Human–humanoid interaction: Is a humanoid robot perceived as a human? Int. J. Hum. Robot. 2, 537–559 (2005)
Chun, M.M., Wolfe, J.M.: Just Say No: How Are Visual Searches Terminated When There Is No Target Present? Cognitive Psychol. 30, 39–78 (1996)
Found, A., Müller, H.J.: Searching for unknown feature targets on more than one dimension: Investigating a ‘dimension weighting’ account. Percept. Psychophys. 58, 88–101 (1996)
Schubö, A., Schröger, E., Meinecke, C.: Texture segmentation and visual search for pop-out targets. Cognit. Brain Res. 21, 317–334 (2004)
Schubö, A., Wykowska, A., Müller, H.J.: Detecting pop-out targets in contexts of varying homogeneity: Investigating homogeneity coding with event-related brain potentials (ERPs). Brain Res. 1138, 136–147 (2007)
Matarić, M.J.: Socially assistive robotics. In: Coradeschi, S., et al. (eds.) Human-Inspired Robots (2006); IEEE Intelligent Systems, 81-83
Bartneck, C., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., Hagita, N.: Is the Uncanny Valley an Uncanny Cliff? In: Proceedings of the 16th IEEE, RO-MAN 2007, Jeju, Korea, pp. 368–373 (2007)
Brenton, H., Gillies, M., Ballin, D., Chatting, D.: The Uncanny Valley: does it exist? Paper Presented at HCI 2005, Animated Characters Interaction Workshop, Edinburgh, Napier University (2005)
MacDorman, K.: Subjective ratings of robot video clips for human-likeness, familiarity, and eeriness: An exploration of the uncanny valley. In: Proceedings of the ICCS/CogSci 2006 Long Symposium: Toward Social Mechanisms of Android Science, Vancouver, Canada, pp. 26–29 (July 2006)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Wykowska, A., Chellali, R., Al-Amin, M.M., Müller, H.J. (2012). Does Observing Artificial Robotic Systems Influence Human Perceptual Processing in the Same Way as Observing Humans?. In: Ge, S.S., Khatib, O., Cabibihan, JJ., Simmons, R., Williams, MA. (eds) Social Robotics. ICSR 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7621. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34103-8_33
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34103-8_33
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-34102-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-34103-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)