Skip to main content

Adaptive Cluster Sampling

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 2009 Accesses

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Statistics ((BRIEFSSTATIST))

Abstract

One of the main methods of adaptive sampling is adaptive cluster sampling. As it involves unequal probability of sampling, standard Horvitz-Thompson and Hansen-Hurwitz estimators can be modified to provide unbiased estimates of finite population parameters along with unbiased variance estimators. These estimators are compared with each other and with conventional estimators. Confidence intervals are discussed, including bootstrap and empirical likelihood methods, and a biased estimator that we call Hájek’s estimator is described because of its link with this topic. The chapter closes with some theory about selecting networks without replacement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See also http://www.cee.vt.edu/ewr/environmental/teach/smprimer/adaptive/adaptv.html.

  2. 2.

    See http://www.lsc.usgs.gov/AEB/davids/acs/ for single stage, two stage, or stratified sampling.

References

  • Acharya, B., A. Bhattarai, A. De Gier, and A. Stein. 2000. “Systematic Adaptive Cluster Sampling for the Assessment of Rare Tree Species in Nepal.” Forest Ecology and Management 137:65–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acworth, J. 1999. “Prunus Africana. Striving for Sustainable and Equitable Resource Management in Cameroon.” Medicinal Plant Conservation 5:15–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arabkhedri, M., F.S. Lai, I. Noor-Akma, and M.K. Mohamad-Roslan. 2010. “An Application of Adaptive Cluster Sampling for Estimating Total Suspended Sediment Load.” Hydrology Research 41:63–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J.A. 2003. “Designing an Efficient Adaptive Cluster Sample.” Environmental and Ecological Statistics 10:95–105.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J.A. and B.F.J. Manly. 1998. “Restricted Adaptive Cluster Sampling.” Environmental and Ecological Statistics 5:49–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chao, C-T., and S.K. Thompson. 1999. “Incomplete Adaptive Cluster Sampling Designs.” In: Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods of the American Statistical Association, 345–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chow, M., and S.K. Thompson. 2003. “Estimation with Link-Tracing Sampling Designs: a Bayesian Approach.” Survey Methodology 29:197–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christman, M.C., and J.S. Pontius. 2000. “Bootstrap Confidence Intervals for Adaptive Cluster Sampling.” Biometrics 56:503–510.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Conners, M.E., and S.J. Schwager. 2002. “The Use of Adaptive Cluster Sampling for Hydroacoustic Surveys.” ICES Journal of Marine Science 59:1314–1325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Consiglio, L.D., and M. Scanu. 2001. “Some Results on Asymptotics in Adaptive Cluster Sampling.” Statistics and Probability Letters 52:189–197.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dryver, A.L. 2003. “Performance of Adaptive Cluster Sampling Estimators in a Multivariate Setting.” Environmental and Ecological Statistics. 10(1):107–113.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Dryver, A.L., and S.K. Thompson. 2006. “ Adaptive Cluster Sampling without Replacement of Clusters.” Statistical Methodology 4:35–43.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Félix-Medina, M.H. (2003). “Asymptotics in Adaptive Cluster Sampling.” Environmental and Ecological Statistics 10:61–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Félix-Medina, M.H., and S.K. Thompson. 2004. “Combining Link-Tracing Sampling and Cluster Sampling to Estimate the Size of Hidden Populations.” Journal of Official Statistics 20:19–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, N.A., J.N. Heine, and J.A. Brown. 2006. “The Application of Adaptive Cluster Sampling for Rare Subtidal Macroalgae.” Marine Biology 151:1343–1348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, S.T. 1980. “Median Estimation in Sample Surveys.” In: Proceedings of the Survey Research Methods Section, 181–184. Alexandria, Virginia: American Statistical Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hájek, J. 1971. “Comment on a paper by D. Basu.” In: V.P. Godambe, and D.A. Sprott (eds.). Foundations of Statistical Inference, 236. Toronto: Holt, Rinehart and Winson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanselman, D.H., T.J. Quinn II, C. Lunsford, J. Heifetz, and D. Clausen. 2003. “Applications in Adaptive Cluster Sampling of Gulf of Alaska Rockfish.” Fisheries Bulletin 101:501–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, M.M., and W.N. Hurwitz. 1943. On the Theory of Sampling from Finite Populations.” Annals of Mathematical Statistics 14:333–362.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hartley H.O., and Rao J.N.K. 1968. “A New Estimation Theory for Sample Surveys.” Biometrika 55:547–557.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Horvitz, D.G., D.J. Thompson. 1952. “A Generalization of Sampling Without Replacement from a Finite Universe.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 47:663–685.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hung, Y. 2011. “Adaptive Probability-Based Latin Hypercube Designs.” Journal of the American Statistical Association: Theory and Methods 106(493): 213–219. DOI: 10.1198/jasa.2011.tm10337

  • Lo, N., D. Griffith, and J.R. Hunter. 1997. “Using a Restricted Adaptive Cluster Sampling to Estimate Pacific Hake Larval Abundance.” California Cooperative Oceanic Fisheries Investigations 38:103–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Low, K.H., G.J. Gordon, J.M. Dolan, and P. Khosla. 2007. “Adaptive Sampling for Multi-Robot Wide-Area Exploration.” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation:755–760. Roma, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnussen, S., W. Kurz, D.G. Leckie, and D. Paradine. 2005. “Adaptive Cluster Sampling for Estimation of Deforestation Rates.” European Journal of Forest Research 124:207–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammadi M. 2011. Nonparametric Confidence Intervals under Adaptive Cluster Sampling. PhD. Thesis, Department of Mathematical sciences, Isfahan University of Technology, Iran.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandallaz, D. 2008. Sampling Techniques for Forest Inventories. Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall/CRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muttlak, H.A., and A. Khan. 2002. “Adjusted Two-Stage Adaptive Cluster Sampling.” Environmental and Ecological Statistics9:111–120.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Noon, B.R., N.M. Ishwar, and K. Vasudevan. 2006. “Efficiency of Adaptive Cluster and Random Sampling in Detecting Terrestrial Herpetofauna in a Tropical Rainforest.” Wildlife Society Bulletin 34:59–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ojiambo P.S., and H. Scherm. 2010. “Efficiency of Adaptive Cluster Sampling for Estimating Plant Disease Incidence.” Phytopathology 100:663–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen, A.B. 1988. “Empirical Likelihood Confidence Intervals for a Single Functional.” Biometrika 75:237–249.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Perez, T.D., and J.S. Pontius. 2006. “Conventional Bootstrap and Normal Confidence Interval Estimation under Adaptive Cluster Sampling.” Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 76:755–764.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Philippi, T., 2005. “Adaptive Cluster Sampling for Estimation of Abundances within Local Populations of Low-Abundance Plants.” Ecology 86:1091–1100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pontius, J.A. 1997. “Strip Adaptive Cluster Sampling: Probability Proportional to Size Selection of Primary Units.” Biometrics 53:1092–1096.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Roesch, F.A. Jr. 1993. “Adaptive Cluster Sampling for Forest Inventories.” Forest Science 39:655–669.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salehi, M.M. 2003. “Comparison Between Hansen-Hurwitz and Horvitz-Thompson Estimators for Adaptive Cluster Sampling.” Environmental and Ecological Statistics. 10:115–127.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Salehi, M.M. and G.A.F. Seber. 1997. “Adaptive Cluster Sampling with Networks Selected without Replacement.” Biometrika 84:209–219.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Salehi M.M., and G.A.F. Seber. 2002. “Unbiased Estimators for Restricted Adaptive Cluster Sampling.” Australian and New Zealand Journal of Statistics 44:63–74.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Salehi, M.M., M. Mohammadi, J.N.K. Rao, and Y.G. Berger. 2010. “Empirical Likelihood Confidence Intervals for Adaptive Cluster Sampling.” Environmental and Ecological Statistics 17:111–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Särndal, C.E., B. Swensson, and J.H. Wretman. 1992. Model Assisted Survey Sampling. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D.R., J.A. Brown, and N.C.H. Lo. 2004. “Application of Adaptive Cluster Sampling to Biological Populations.” In: W.L. Thompson (Ed.) Sampling Rare and Elusive Species, 77–122. Washington DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D.R., M.J.Conroy, and D.H. Brakhage. 1995. “Efficiency of Adaptive Cluster Sampling for Estimating Density of Wintering Waterfowl.” Biometrics 51:777–788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D.R., B.R. Gray, T.R. Newton, and D. Nichols. 2011. “Effect of Imperfect Detectability on Adaptive and Conventional Sampling: Simulated Sampling of Freshwater Mussels in the Upper Mississippi River.” Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 170: 499–507. DOI: 10.1007/s10661-009-1251-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. R., R.F. Villella, and D.P. Lemarie. 2003. “Application of Adaptive Cluster Sampling to Low-Density Populations of Freshwater Mussels.” Environmental and Ecological Statistics 10:7–15.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • St. Clair, K., and D. O’Connell. 2011. “A Bayesian Model for Estimating Population Means Using a Link-Tracing Sampling Design.” Biometrics, DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2011.01631.x.

  • Su, Z., and T.J. Quinn II. 2003. “Estimator Bias and Efficiency for Adaptive Cluster Sampling with Order Statistics and a Stopping Rule.” Environmental and Ecological Statistics 10(1):17–41.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, W.P., B.P. Morrison, and F.W.H. Beamish. 2008. “Adaptive Cluster Sampling: Estimating Density of Spatially Autocorrelated Larvae of the Sea Lamprey with Improved Precision.” Journal of Great Lakes Research 34:86–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talvitie, M., O. Leino, and M. Holopainen. 2006. “Inventory of Sparse Forest Populations Using Adaptive Cluster Sampling.” Silva Fennica 40:101–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, S.K. 1990. “Adaptive Cluster Sampling.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 85:1050–1059.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, S.K. 1993. “Multivariate Aspects of Adaptive Cluster Sampling.” In: G.P. Patil and C.R. Rao (Eds) Multivariate Environmental Statistics, 561–572. New York: North Holland/Elsevier Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, S. K. 1996. “Adaptive Cluster Sampling Based on Order Statistics.” Environmetrics 7:123–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, S.K. 2006a. “Targeted Random Walk Designs.” Survey Methodology 32:11–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, S.K. 2006b. “Adaptive Web Sampling.” Biometrics 62:1224–1234.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, S.K., and L.M.Collins. 2002. “Adaptive Sampling in Research on Risk-Related Behaviors.” Drug and Alcohol Dependence, Supplement 1 168: 57–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, S.K., and O. Frank. 2000. “Model-Based Estimation with Link-Tracing Sampling Designs.” Survey Methodology 26:87–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, S.K., and G.A.F. Seber. 1994. “Detectability in Conventional and Adaptive Sampling.” Biometrics 50:712–724.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, S.K., and G.A.F. Seber. 1996. Adaptive Sampling. New York: Wiley.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Woodby, D. 1998. “Adaptive Cluster Sampling: Efficiency, Fixed Sample Sizes, and an Application to Red Sea Urchins (Strongylocentrotus Franciscanus) in Southeast Alaska.” Proceedings of the North Pacific Symposium on Invertebrate Stock Assessment and Management 125:15–20. Canadian special publication of fisheries and aquatic sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, H., C. Kleinn, L. Fehrmann, S. Tang, and S. Magnussen. 2011. A New Design for Sampling with Adaptive Sample Plots. Environmental and Ecological Statistics 18:223–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, N., Z. Zhu, and B. Hu. 2000. “On Two-Stage Adaptive Cluster Sampling to Assess Pest Density.” Journal of Zhejiang University 26:617–620.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to George A. F. Seber .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Seber, G.A.F., Salehi, M.M. (2012). Adaptive Cluster Sampling. In: Adaptive Sampling Designs. SpringerBriefs in Statistics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33657-7_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics